Cartography: Uncertainty, interventions, and dynamic display

Progress in Human Geography

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 373-381

  Monmonier, Mark ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARTOGRAPHY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 33745499043     PISSN: 03091325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0309132506ph612pr     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Aerts, J.C.J.H., Clarke, K.C. and Keuper, A.D. 2003: Testing popular visualization techniques for representing model uncertainty. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 30, 249-61.
2. Agumya, A. and Hunter, G.J. 2002: Responding to the consequences of uncertainty in geographical data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 16, 405-17.
3. Armstrong, M.P., Rushton, G. and Zimmerman, D.L. 1999: Geographically masking health data to preserve confidentiality. Statistics in Medicine 18, 497-525.
4. Bachmann, A. and Allgöwer, B. 2002: Uncertainty propagation in wildland fire behaviour modelling. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 16, 115-27.
5. Bartkowski, J.P., Howell, F.M. and Lai, S.-C. 2002: Spatial variations in church burnings: the social ecology of victimized communities in the South. Rural Sociology 67, 578-602.
6. Boba, R. 2005: Crime analysis and crime mapping. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Brassel, K.E. and Utano, J.J. 1979: Mapping from an automated display system. Professional Geographer 31, 191-200.
8. Carr, D.B., White, D. and MacEachren, A.M. 2005: Conditioned choropleth maps and hypothesis generation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95, 32-53.
9. Ceccato, V., Haining, R. and Signoretta, P. 2002: Exploring offence statistics in Stockholm City using spatial analysis tools. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92, 29-51.
10. Chainey, S. and Ratcliffe, J. 2005: GIS and crime mapping. Chichester: Wiley.
11. Cheung, C.K. and Shi, W. 2004: Estimation of the positional uncertainty in line simplification in GIS. Cartographic Journal 41, 37-45.
12. Clarke, K.C. 2004: Mobile mapping and geographic information systems. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 31, 131-36.
13. Committee to Review the US Geological Survey Concept of The National Map, Mapping Science Committee, National Research Council 2003: Weaving a national map: review of the US Geological Survey concept of The National Map. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. Cornélis, B. and Brunet, S. 2002: A policy-maker point of view on uncertainties in spatial decisions. In Shi, W., Fisher, P.F. and Goodchild, M.F., editors, Spatial data quality, London: Taylor and Francis, 168-85.
15. Cornell, E.H., Sorenson, A. and Mio, T. 2003: Human sense of direction and wayfinding. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93, 399-425.
16. Crampton, J.W. 2000: A history of distributed mapping. Cartographic Perspectives 35, 48-65.
17. Crampton, J.W. 2003: Cartographic rationality and the politics of geosurveillance and security. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 30, 135-48.
18. Crosetto, M. and Tarantola, S. 2001: Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis: tools for GIS-based model implementation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15, 415-37.
19. Dalby, L. 2004: Don't take a knife to a gunfight: GIS in rural law enforcement. Earth Observation Magazine 13, 4-8.
20. de Cola, L. 2002: Spatial forecasting of disease risk and uncertainty. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 29, 363-80.
21. Dean, D.J. 2004: Toward a differential calculus for temporal map analysis. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 31, 89-101.
22. Dorling, D. 1996: Area cartograms: their use and creation. Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography (CATMOG), no. 59.
23. Drecki, I. 2002: Visualization of uncertainty in geographical data. In Shi, W., Fisher, P.F. and Goodchild, M. F., editors, Spatial data quality, London: Taylor and Francis, 140-59.
24. Dymon, U.J. 2003: An analysis of emergency map symbology. International Journal of Emergency Management 1, 227-37.
25. Edney, M.H. 1993: Cartography without 'progress': reinterpreting the nature and historical development of mapmaking. Cartographica 30, 54-68.
26. Fauerbach, E., Edsall, R., Barnes, D. and MacEachren, A. 1996: Visualization of uncertainty in meteorological forecast models. In Kraak, M.J. and Molenaar, M., editors, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Delft, The Netherlands, 12-16 August, London: Taylor and Francis, 465-76.
27. Gastner, M.T. and Newman, M.E.J. 2004: Diffusion-based method for producing density-equalizing maps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101, 7499-504.
28. Gastner, M., Shalizi, C. and Newman, M. 2004: Maps and cartograms of the 2004 US presidential election results. Retrieved 27 January 2006 from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/
29. Hagen, A. 2003: Fuzzy set approach to assessing similarity of categorical maps. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 17, 235-49.
30. Hallisey, E.J. 2005: Cartographic visualization: an assessment and epistemological review. Professional Geographer 57, 350-64.
31. Harries, K. 1999: Mapping crime: principle and practice. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. Retrieved 27 January 2006 from http://www.ncjrs.org/html/nij/ mapping/pdf.html
32. Harrower, M. 2004: A look at the history and future of animated maps. Cartographica 39, 33-42.
33. Hengl, T., Walvoort, D.J.J., Brown, A. and Rossiter, D. G. 2004: A double continuous approach to visualization and analysis of categorical maps. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 18, 183-202.
34. Ishikawa, T., Barnston, A.G., Kastens, K.A., Louchouarn, P. and Ropelewski, C.F. 2005: Climate forecast maps as a communication and decisions-support tool: an empirical test with prospective policy makers. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 32, 3-16.
35. Karimi, H.A. and Grejner-Brezezinska, D.A. 2004: GQMAP: improving performance and productivity of mobile mapping systems through GPS quality of service. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 31, 167-77.
36. Kelmelis, J.A., DeMulder, M.L., Ogrosky, C.E., van Driel, N.J., and Ryan, B.J. 2003: The National Map: from geography to mapping and back again. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 69, 1109-18.
37. Koua, E.L. and Kraak, M.-J. 2004: Alternative visualization of large geospatial datasets. Cartographic Journal 41, 217-28.
38. Lai, P.-C. and Yeh, A.G.-O. 2004: Assessing the effectiveness of dynamic symbols in cartographic communication. Cartographic Journal 41, 229-44.
39. Leipnik, M., Bottelli, J., von Essen, I., Schmidt, A., Anderson, L. and Cooper, T. 2001: Coordinates of a killer. Geospatial Solutions 11, 22-33.
40. Leitner, M. and Curtis, A. 2004: Cartographic guidelines for geographically masking the locations of confidential point data. Cartographic Perspectives 49, 22-39.
41. Li, Z. and Ho, A. 2004: Design of multi-scale and dynamic maps for land navigation. Cartographic Journal 41, 265-70.
42. Liebermann, S. and Coulson, J. 2004: Participatory mapping for crime prevention in South Africa: local solutions to local problems. Environment and Urbanization 16, 125-34.
43. Loukaitou-Sideris, A. 1999: Hot spots of bus stop crime: the importance of environmental attributes. Journal of the American Planning Association 65, 395-411.
44. MacEachren, A.M. 2000: Cartography and GIS: facilitating collaboration. Progress in Human Geography 24, 445-56.
45. MacEachren, A.M. 2001: Cartography and GIS: extending collaborative tools to support virtual teams. Progress in Human Geography 25, 431-44.
46. MacEachren, A.M. and Brewer, I. 2004: Developing a conceptual framework for visually-enabled geo-collaboration. International Journal of Geographic Information Science 18, 1-34.
47. MacEachren, A.M., Cai, G., Sharma, R., Rauschert, I., Brewer, I., Bolelli, L., Shaparenko, B., Fuhrmann, S. and Wang, H. 2005: Enabling collaborative geoinformation access and decision-making through a natural, multimodal interface. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 19, 293-317.
48. MacGillavry, E. 2003: Collaborative mapping: by the people, for the people. SoC Bulletin (Society of Cartographers) 37, 43-45.
49. Mennis, J., Vigor, R. and Tomlin, C.D. 2005: Cubic map algebra functions for spatio-temporal analysis. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 32, 17-32.
50. Milward, A. 2005: The resurgence of the cartogram: (re)covering an election. Cartouche (newsletter of the Canadian Cartographic Association) 56, 13-14.
51. Monmonier, M. 2001: Bushmanders and bullwinkles: how politicians manipulate electronic maps and census data to win elections. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52. Monmonier, M. 2002: Spying with maps: surveillance technologies and the future of privacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53. Plewe, B.S. 2003: Representing datum-level uncertainty in historical GIS. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 30, 319-34.
54. Rashed, T. and Weeks, J. 2003: Assessing vulnerability to earthquake hazards through spatial multicriteria analysis of urban areas. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 17, 547-76.
55. Ratcliffe, J.H. 2004: Geocoding crime and a first estimate of a minimum acceptable hit rate. International Journal of Geographic Information Science 18, 61-72.
56. Reinke, K. and Hunter, G.J. 2002: A theory for communicating uncertainty in spatial databases. In Shi, W., Fisher, P.F. and Goodchild, M.F., editors, Spatial data quality, London: Taylor and Francis, 76-101.
57. Schafer, W.A., Ganoe, C.H., Xiao, L., Coch, G. and Carroll, J.M. 2005: Designing the next generation of distributed, geocollaborative tools. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 32, 81-100.
58. Schneider, B. 2001: On the uncertainty of local shape of lines and surfaces. Cartography and Geographic Information Sciences 28, 237-47.
59. Sharpe, B. 2000: Geographies of criminal victimization in Canada. Canadian Geographer, 44, 418-28.
60. Shi, W., Fisher, P.F. and Goodchild, M.F., editors 2002: Spatial data quality. London: Taylor and Francis.
61. Slocum, T.A., Cliburn, D.C., Feddema, J.J. and Miller, J.R. 2003: Evaluating the usability of a tool for visualizing the uncertainty of the future global water balance. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 30, 299-317.
62. Slocum, T.A., Sluter, R.S. Jr., Kessler, F.C. and Yoder, S.C. 2004: A qualitative evaluation of Map Time, a program for exploring spatiotemporal point data. Cartographica 39, 43-68.
63. Stoe, D.A., Watkins, C.R., Kerr, J., Rost, L. and Craig, T. 2003: Using geographic information systems to map crime victim services: a guide for state Victims of Crime Act administrators and victim service providers. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office for Victims of Crime. Retrieved 27 January 2006 from http:// www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ovc/publications/infores/geoinfosys2003/191877.pdf
64. Succi, L. 2005: The National Geospatial Programs Office - finding a home for USGS geospatial programs. ACSM (American Congress on Surveying and Mapping) Bulletin 214, 49-50, 54.
65. van Vijk, J.J. and Nuij, W.A.A. 2004: A model for smooth viewing and navigation of large 2D information spaces. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 10, 447-58.
66. Wang, F. and Minor, W.W. 2002: Where the jobs are: employment access and crime pattern in Cleveland. Annals ofthe Association of American Geographers 92, 435-50.
67. Wartell, J. and McEwen, J.T. 2001: Privacy in the information age: a guide for sharing crime maps and spatial data. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. Retrieved 27 January 2006 from www.ncjrs.org/pdffilesl/nij/ 188739.pdf
68. Zeller, T. 2004: One state, two state, red state, blue state. New York Times 8 February, Week in Review section, 16.