Erratum: Van Kampen's expansion approach in an opinion formation model (European Physical Journal B (2006) 51 (435) DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2006-00232-8);Van Kampen's expansion approach in an opinion formation model

European Physical Journal B

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 435-442

  De La Lama, M S ^a   Szendro, I G ^a   Iglesias, J R ^b   Wio, H S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTABRIA   (Spain)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTELLIGENT AGENTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY;

FOKKER-PLANCK EQUATIONS; OPINION FORMATION MODEL; RELAXATION BEHAVIOR; VAN KAMPEN'S EXPANSION APPROACH;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 33745459002     PISSN: 14346028     EISSN: 14346036     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2007-00206-4     Document Type: Erratum

References (47)

1. W. Weidlich, Sociodynamics-A systematic approach to mathematical modelling in social sciences (Taylor & Francis, London, 2002)
2. W. Weidlich, Phys. Rep. 204, 1 (1991)
3. D. Stauffer, S. Moss de Oliveira, P.M.C. de Oliveira, J.S. Sa Martins, Biology, Sociology, Geology by Computational Physicists (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006)
4. D. Stauffer, Physica A 336, 1 (2004
5. S. Galam, Physica A 336, 49 (2004)
6. S. Galam, B. Chopard, A. Masselot, M. Droz, Eur. Phys. J. B 4, 529 (1998);
7. S. Galam, J.-D. Zucker, Physica A 287, 644 (2000);
8. S. Galam, Eur. Phys. J. B 25, 403 (2002);
9. S. Galam, Physica A 320, 571 (2003)
10. G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard, G. Weisbuch, Adv. Complex Syst. 3, 87 (2000);
11. G. Weisbuch, G. Deffuant, F. Amblard, J.-P. Nadal, Complexity 7, 55 (2002);
12. F. Amblard, G. Deffuant, Physica A 343, 453 (2004)
13. R. Hegselmann, U. Krausse, J. of Artif. Soc. and Social Sim. 5, 3 (2002)
14. K. Sznajd-Weron, J. Sznajd, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 11, 1157 (2000);
15. K. Sznajd-Weron, J. Sznajd, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 13, 115 (2000);
16. K. Sznajd-Weron, Phys. Rev. E 66 046131 (2002)
17. F. Slanina, H. Lavicka, Eur. Phys. J. B 35, 279 (2003)
18. M. He, Q. Sun, H. Wang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 15, 767 (2004)
19. D. Stauffer, A.O. Souza, S. Moss de Oliveira, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 11, 1239 (2000);
20. R. Ochrombel, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 12, 1091 (2001);
21. D. Stauffer, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 13, 315 (2002);
22. D. Stauffer, P.C.M. Oliveira, Eur. Phys. J. B 30, 587 (2002)
23. D. Stauffer, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 13, 975 (2002)
24. D. Stauffer, J. of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5, 1 (2001);
25. D. Stauffer, AIP Conf. Proc. 690 (1), 147 (2003);
26. D. Stauffer, Computing in Science and Engineering 5, 71 (2003)
27. C. Castellano, M. Marsili, A. Vespignani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3536 (2000);
28. D. Vilone, A. Vespignani, C. Castellano, Eur. Phys. J. B 30, 399 (2002)
29. K. Klemm, V.M. Eguiluz, R. Toral, M. San Miguel, Phys. Rev. E 67, 026120 (2003);
30. K. Klemm, V.M. Eguiluz, R. Toral, M. San Miguel, Phys. Rev. E 67, 045101R (2003);
31. K. Klemm, V.M. Eguiluz, R. Toral, M. San Miguel, J. Economic Dynamics and Control 29, (1, 2), 321 (2005)
32. P.L. Krapivsky, S. Redner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 238701 (2003)
33. M. Mobilia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 028701 (2003);
34. M. Mobilia, S. Redner, e-print arXiv:cond-mat/0306061 (2003)
35. C. Tessone, P. Amengual, R. Toral, H.S. Wio, M. San Miguel, Eur. Phys. J. B 25, 403 (2004)
36. M.F. Laguna, S. Risau Gusman, G. Abramson, S. Gonçalves, J.R. Iglesias, Physica A 351, 580 (2005)
37. J.J. Schneider, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 15, 659 (2004),
38. J.J. Schneider, Ch. Hirtreiter, Physica A 353, 539 (2005),
39. J.J. Schneider, Ch. Hirtreiter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 16, 157 (2005)
40. F. Vazquez, P.L. Kaprivsky, S. Redner, J. Phys. A 36, L61 (2003);
41. F. Vazquez, S. Redner, J. Phys. A 37, 8479 (2004)
42. P. Babinec, Phys. Lett. A 225, 179 (1997)
43. M.S. de la Lama, J.M. López, H.S. Wio, Europhys. Lett. T2, 851 (2005)
44. N.G. van Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry (North Holland, Amsterdam, 2004), Ch. X;
45. H.S. Wio, An Introduction to Stochastic Processes and Nonequilibrium Statistical Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994), Ch. 1
46. st = 0). In such cases, the tail of fluctuations falling outside the physical region will be too large invalidating the whole approach. Clearly, the parameters choosen for Figure 4 avoid such pathological situation, as the fluctuation tails falling outside the physical region are negligible
47. C. Schat, G. Abramson, H.S. Wio, Am. J. Phys. 59, 357 (1991)