From individual choice to group decision-making

Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications

Volumn 287, Issue 3-4, 2000, Pages 644-659

  Galam, Serge ^a   Zucker, Jean Daniel ^b  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RANDOM PROCESSES;

GROUP DECISION MAKING;

STATISTICAL MECHANICS;

EID: 0034516810     PISSN: 03784371     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00399-X     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Galam S., Moscovici S. Towards a theory of collective phenomena. I: Consensus and attitude change in groups. Eur. J. Social Psychol. 21:1991;49-74.
2. Chigier N.A., Stern (Eds.) E.A. Collective Phenomena and the Applications of Physics to Other Fields of Science. 1974;Brain Research Publications, New York.
3. Galam S., Gefen Y., Shapir Y. Sociophysics: a new approach of sociological collective behavior. J. Math. Sociol. 9:1982;1.
4. Galam S. Majority rule, hierarchical structure and democratic totalitarianism. J. Math. Psychol. 30:1986;426.
5. Galam S. Social paradoxes of majority rule voting and renormalization group. J. Stat. Phys. 61:1990;943-951.
6. Galam S., Moscovici S. Towards a theory of collective phenomena. II: Conformity and Power. Eur. J. Social Psychol. 24:1994;481.
7. Galam S., Moscovici S. Towards a theory of collective phenomena. III: Conflicts and Forms of Power. Eur. J. Social Psychol. 25:1995;217.
8. Lewenstein M., Nowak A., Latané B. Statistical mechanics of social impact. Phys. Rev. A 45:1992;1.
9. Kohring G.A. Ising models of social impact: the role of cumulative advantage. J. Phys. I (France). 6:1996;301.
10. Levy M., Levy H., Solomon S. Microscopic simulation of the stock market. J. Phys. I (France). 5:1995;1087.
11. Helbing D., Hennecke A., Treiber M. Phase diagram of traffic states in the presence of inhomogeneities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82:1999;4360.
12. Stauffer D., de Oliveira P.M.C., Moss de Oliveira S., Zorzenon dos Santos R.M. Monte Carlo simulations of sexual reproduction. Physica. A 231:1996;504.
13. Galam S. Rational group decision making: A random field Ising model at. T=0 Physica. A 238:1997;66-80.
14. Derrida B., Bray A.J., Godréche C. Non-trivial exponents in the zero temperature dynamics of the. 1D Ising and Potts models J. Phys. A 27:1994;L357.
15. Stauffer D. Ising spinodal decomposition at. T=0 in one to five dimensions J. Phys. A 27:1994;5029.
16. Ma Sh-k Modern Theory of Critical Phenomena. 1976;The Benjamin Inc, Reading, MA.
17. Turner J.C. Rediscovering the Social Group. 1987;Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
18. Moscovici S., Zavalloni M. The group as a polarizer of attitudes. J. Personality Social Psychol. 12:1969;125-135.
19. Burnstein E., Vinokur A. Testing two classes of theories about group induced shifts in individual choices. J. Exp. Social Psychol. 9:1973;123-137.
20. Davis J. Group decision and social interactions: A theory of social decision scheme. Psychol. Rev. 80:1973;97-125.
21. Moscovici S. Social Influence and Social Change. 1976;Academic Press, London.
22. Gilbert N., Doran (Eds.) J. Simulating Societies. 1994;UCL, London.
23. Epstein J.M., Axtell (Eds.) R. Growing Artificial Societies. 1996;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
24. A. Drogoul, J. Ferber, Multi-agent simulation as a tool for studying emergent processes in societies, in: J.M. Epstein, R. Axtell (Eds.), Growing Artificial Societies, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996 (Chapter 6).
25. L. Breton, J.-D. Zucker, E. Clement, A Multi-agent approach for the resolution of equations in granular physics, Multi-agent systems and Agent-Based Simulation, L. Schimansky-Geier, T. Pöschel (Eds.), 2000, to be published.
26. F. Schweitzer, Active Brownian particles: artificial agents in physics, in: Stochastic Dynamics, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 484, Springer, Berlin, 1997, pp. 358-371.