Whatever happened to the psychology of human-computer interaction?: A biography of the life of a psychological framework within a HCI journal

Information Technology & People

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 121-151

  Clemmensen, Torkil ^a  

^a Department of Innovation and Organizational Economics   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Computer theory; Psychological research; Psychology; Research work

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745458125     PISSN: 09593845     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09593840610673793     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. Anderson, J.R. (2003), “John R. Anderson – research interests”, available at: http://act-r.psy.cmu.edu/people/ja/ja-interests (accessed 27 November 2003).
2. Atwood, M.E., McCain, K.W. and Williams, J.C. (2002), “How does the design community think about design?”, paper presented at the DIS2002, London.
3. Banker, R.D. and Kauffman, R.J. (2004), “The evolution of research on information systems: a fiftieth-year survey of the literature in management science”, Management Science, Vol. 50 No. 3, p. 281.
4. Bannon, L. (1993), “Perspectives on CSCW: From HCI and CMC to CSCW”, paper presented at the EW-HCI'92.
5. Barnard, P.J., Coutaz, J., Hammond, N.V., Harrison, M.D., J⊘rgensen, A.H. and MacLean, A. et al. (1992), Final Report – the Amodeus Project Esprit Basic Research Action 3066, The Amodeus Project Co-ordinating Contractor: MRC Applied Psychology Unit (APU), Cambridge.
6. Berthelsen, O. and B⊘dker, S. (2003) in Ed. Carroll, J. (Ed.), HCI Models, Theories and Frameworks – Towards a Multidisciplinary Science, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA, pp. 291-324.
7. Blum, L. (2003), “Women in computer science: the Carnegie Mellon experience”, available at: http://women.cs.cmu.edu/Web/Papers/ (accessed 27 November 2003).
8. B⊘dker, S. (1989), “A human activity approach to user interfaces”, Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 171-96.
9. Booth, P.A. (1991), “Errors and theory in human-computer interaction”, Acta Psychologica, Vol. 78 Nos 1-3, pp. 69-96.
10. Borg, A. (2003), “Changing the world for women and for technology”, available at: http://iwt.org/home.html (accessed 27 November 2003).
11. Borgman, C.L. (1984), “Psychological-research in human-computer interaction”, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 19, pp. 33-64.
12. Borgman, C.L. and Furner, J. (2002), “Scholarly communication and bibliometrics”, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 36, pp. 3-72.
13. Card, S., Moran, T.P. and Newell, A. (1983), The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction, LEA, Hillsdale, NJ.
14. Carroll, J.M. (1997), “Human-computer interaction: psychology as a science of design”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp. 501-22.
15. Carroll, J.M. (2003), HCI Models, Theories and Frameworks – towards a Multidisciplinary Science, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
16. Carroll, J.M. (2005), “Research interests”, available at: http://ist.psu.edu/facultyresearch/faculty/tenuretrack/page2.cfm?intNodeID = 127&intPageID = 668&EmployeeID = 234 (accessed 22 August 2005).
17. Carroll, J.M. and Campbell, R.L. (1986), “Softening up hard science: reply to Newell and Card”, Human Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, pp. 227-49.
18. Chavalier, A. and Ivory, M.Y. (2003), “Website design: influences on designer's expertise and design constraints”, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 58 No. 1, pp. 57-87.
19. Claver, E., Gonzalez, R. and Llopis, J. (2000), “An analysis of research in information systems (1981-1997)”, Information & Management, Vol. 37, pp. 181-95.
20. Clemmensen, T. (2003), “Usability professionals' personal interest in basic HCI theory”, paper presented at the INTERACT 2003 – Bringing the Bits Together – Ninth IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human -Computer Interaction, Zürich, Switzerland (accessed 1-5 September 2003).
21. Clemmensen, T. (2004), “Four approaches to user modelling – a qualitative research interview study of HCI professionals' practice”, Interacting with Computers, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 799-829.
22. Cooper, G. and Bowers, J. (1995), “Representing the user: notes on the disciplinary rhetoric of human-computer interaction”, in Ed. Thomas, P.J. (Ed.), The Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human-Computer Interfaces, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
23. Creswell, J.W. (2003), Research Design – Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approaches, Sage, London.
24. Culnan, M.J. (1987), “Mapping the intellectual structure of MIS, 1980-1985: a co-citation analysis”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 11 No. 3, p. 340.
25. Dahler-Larsen, P. (2002), At Fremstille Kvalitative Data, Universitetsforlag.
26. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G. and Beale, R. (2004), Human-Computer Interaction – Third Edition, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
27. Egghe, L. and Rousseau, R. (1990), Introduction to Informetrics, Elsevier, London.
28. Galliers, R.D. and Whitley, E.A. (2002), “An anatomy of European information systems research ECIS 1993-ECIS 2002: some initial findings”, paper presented at the ECIS 2002, Gdansk, Poland.
29. Gulliksen, J., Blomkvist, S. and Goransson, B. (2003), “Engineering the HCI profession or softening development processes”, paper presented at the HCI International 2003, Crete.
30. Hardgrave, B. and Walstrom, K. (1997), “Forum for MIS scholars”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 40 No. 11, pp. 119-24.
31. Hartson, H.R. (1998), “Human-computer interaction: interdisciplinary roots and trends”, Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 103-18.
32. Hertzum, M. and Jacobsen, N.E. (2001), “The evaluator effect: a chilling fact about usability evaluation methods”, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 421-43.
33. Hood, W.W. and Wilson, C.S. (2001), “The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics”, Scientometrics, Vol. 52 No. 2, pp. 291-314.
34. Isomaki, H. and Pohjola, A. (2005), “Introducing multiple views on gender and information technology”, in Ed. Isomaki, H. and Ed. Pohjola, A. (Eds), Lost and Found in Virtual Reality: Women and Information Technology, University of Lapland, Lapland.
35. Jarvinen, P. (2001), On research Methods, University of Tampere, Tampere.
36. John, B.E. (2003), “Information processing and skilled behaviour”, in Ed. Carroll, J. (Ed.), HCI Models, Theories and Frameworks – Towards a Multidisciplinary Science, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA, pp. 55-101.
37. John, B.E., Bass, L. and Adams, R.J. (2003), “Communications across the HCI/SE divide: ISO13407 and the rational unified process®”, paper presented at the HCI International 2003, Crete.
38. Kashima, Y. (2004), “Culture, communication and entitativity – a social psychological investigation of social reality”, in Ed. Yzerbyt, V., Ed. Judd, C.M. and Ed. Corneille, O. (Eds), The Psychology of Group Perception – Perceived Variability, Entitativity and Essentialism, Psychology Press, New York, NY.
39. Katerattanakul, P., Han, B. and Hong, S. (2003), “Objective quality ranking of computing journals”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 46 No. 10, pp. 111-4.
40. Kautz, K. and Pries-Heje, J. (2000), “Systems development education and methodology adoption”, Journal of Computer Personnel, Vol. 20 No. 3.
41. Kopytoff, I. (1986), “The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process”, in Ed. Appadurai, A. (Ed.), The Social Life of Things – Commodities in Cultural Perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
42. Kraut, R.E. (2003), “Applying social psychological theory to the problems of group work”, in Ed. Carroll, J. (Ed.), HCI Models, Theories and Frameworks – Towards a Multidisciplinary Science, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA, pp. 325-56.
43. Kuutti, K. (1996), “At as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research”, in Ed. B⊘dker, S. and Ed. Nardi, B.A. (Eds), Context and Consciousness, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 17-44.
44. McCain, K.W. (1990), “Mapping authors in intellectual space: population genetics in the 1980s”, in Ed. Borgman, C.L. (Ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, Sage, London, pp. 194-216.
45. Meister, D. (2004), Conceptual Foundations of Human Factors Measurement, Lawrence Erlbaum, London.
46. Newell, A. and Card, S.K. (1985), “The prospects for psychological science in human-computer interaction”, Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1 No. 3, p. 34.
47. Newell, A. and Card, S.K. (1986), “Straightening out softening up: response to Carroll and Campbell”, Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2 No. 3, p. 17.
48. Newell, A. and Simon, H.A. (1976), “Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 113-26.
49. Nielsen, J., Christiansen, N., Levinsen, K., Nielsen, L., Yssing, C. and Ørngreen, R. et al. (2004), “The human being in the 21st century – design perspectives on the representation of users in is development”, paper presented at the OZCHI 2004, University of Wollongong, Australia, November, pp. 22-4.
50. Nielsen, J., Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. and Danielsen, O. (2003), “Dialogue design – with mutual learning as guiding principle”, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 21-40.
51. Nikolaos, A.M. and Vasilis, T. (2001), “On site: global perceptions of IS journals”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 44 No. 9, pp. 29-33.
52. Nord, J.H. and Nord, G.D. (1995), “MIS research: journal status assessment and analysis”, Information & Management, Vol. 29 No. 1, p. 29.
53. Norman, D.A. (1988), The Design of Everyday Things, Basic Books, New York, NY.
54. Norman, D.A. (1999), “Affordance, conventions, and design”, Interactions, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 38-43.
55. Nunamaker, J.F. (1980), “Publications and the use of the Science Citation Index”, paper presented at the First International Conference on Information Systems.
56. Olson, G.M. (2003), “Research interests”, available at: www.crew.umich.edu/Investigators/golson.htm (accessed on 27 November 2003).
57. Olson, G.M. and Olson, J.S. (2003), “Human-computer interaction: psychological aspects of the human use of computing”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 54, pp. 491-516.
58. Oshlyansky, L., Thimbleby, H. and Cairns, P. (2004), “Breaking affordance: culture as context”, paper presented at the Proceedings of the Third Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Tampere.
59. Rogers, Y. (2004), “New theoretical approaches for HCI”, ARIST, Vol. 38 No. 1.
60. Saeman, H. (2000), “Breakthroughs for women psychologists highlighted last quarter of 20th century”, The National Psychologist.
61. Schneiderman, B. and Plaisant, C. (2004), Designing the User Interface, 4th ed., Pearson Addison Wesley, Harlow.
62. Smith, A. and Yetim, F. (2004), “Global human-computer systems: cultural determinants of usability. Editorial”, Interacting with Computers, Vol. 16.
63. Streitz, N. (2004), “The disappearing computer: the next generation of human-computer interaction”, paper presented at the (4020 Invited Symposium), 28th International Congress of Psychology, Beijing, China, August, pp. 8-13.
64. Suchman, L. (1990) in Ed. Woolgar, S. and Ed. Lynch (Eds), Representation in Scientific Practice, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
65. Valero, P. and Monk, A.F. (1998), “Positioning HCI: journals, descriptors and parent disciplines”, Behaviour and Information Technology, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 3-9.
66. Walstrom, K.A. and Leonard, L.N.K. (2000), “Citation classics from the information systems literature”, Information & Management, Vol. 38, pp. 59-72.
67. WenShin, C. and Hirschheim, R. (2004), “A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001”, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 14 No. 3, p. 197.
68. White, H.D. (1990), “Author co-citation analysis: overview and defense”, in Ed. Borgman, C.L. (Ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, Sage, London, pp. 84-106.
69. White, H.D. and McCain, K.W. (1989), “Bibliometrics”, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 24, pp. 119-86.
70. White, H.D. and McCain, K.W. (1998), “Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 49 No. 4, pp. 327-55.
71. Whittaker, S., Terveen, L. and Nardi, B.A. (2000), “Let's stop pushing the envelope and start addressing it: a reference task agenda for HCI”, Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 15 Nos 2/3, pp. 75-106.
72. Wilson, C.S. (2001), “Informetrics”, in Ed. Williams, M.E. (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 34, Information Today, Inc., Medford, NJ, pp. 107-48.
73. Woolgar, S. (1991), “Configuring the user: the case of usability trials”, in Ed. Law, J. (Ed.), A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge, London, pp. 32-64.