Surface glyphs for efficient visualization of spatial multivariate data

Information Visualization

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 112-124

  Forsell, Camilla ^a   Seipel, Stefan ^a   Lind, Mats ^a  

^a Institutionen för Informationsvetenskap mdi   (Sweden)

Author keywords

3D structure; Glyphs; Multidimensional visualization; Perception; Surface glyphs

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; SENSORY PERCEPTION; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS; VISUALIZATION;

3D STRUCTURE; GLYPHS; MULTIDIMENSIONAL VISUALIZATION; SURFACE GLYPHS;

IMAGE PROCESSING;

EID: 33745457200     PISSN: 14738716     EISSN: 14738724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500119     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Chernoff H. Using faces to represent points in k-dimensional space. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1973; 68: 361-368.
2. Picket RM, Grinstein GG. Iconographic displays for visualizing multidimensional data. IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 1988 (Beijing and Shenyang, China); IEEE Computer Society Press: Chicago, 1988; 1: 514-519.
3. Chambers JM, Cleveland WS, Kleiner B, Tukey PA. Graphical Methods for Data Analysis. Wadsworth: Belmont, CA, 1983; 395pp.
4. Mezzich JE, Worthington DRL. A comparison of graphical representations of multidimensional psychiatric diagnostic data. In: Wang P (Ed). Graphical Representation of Multivariate Data. Academic Press: New York, 1978; 123-141.
5. Pazner M, Ripley N. Interactive multivariate pattern images. GeoTec Event - GIS 2002 Conference (Toronto, ON); Proceedings published on CD ROM by GEOTec Media: Boulder, CO, 2002; 6pp.
6. Zhang X, Pazner M. The imagemap technique for multivariate geospatial data visualization: approach and software system. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 2004; 31: 29-41.
7. Lind M, Bingham GP, Forsell C. Metric 3D structure in visualizations. Information Visualization 2003; 2: 51-57.
8. Todd JT, Norman JF. The visual perception of 3-D shape from multiple cues: Are observers capable of perceiving metric structure?. Perception & Psychophysics 2003; 65: 31-47.
9. Todd JT, Tittle JS, Norman JF. Distortions of three-dimensional space in the perceptual analysis of motion and stereo. Perception 1995; 24: 75-86.
10. Todd JT. The visual perception of 3D shape. Trends in Cognitive Science 2004; 8: 115-121.
11. Tittle JS, Woods DW, Howard M, Phillips F. The role of 2-D and 3-D task performance in the design of and use of visual displays. 45th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2001 (Minneapolis, MN), Human Factors and Ergonomics Society: Santa Monica, CA, 2001; 1215-1219.
12. Mackinlay JD. Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. In: Card SK, Mackinlay JD and Schneiderman B (Eds). Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers: San Francisco, CA, 1999; 66-81.
13. Ware C. Information Visualization: Perception for Design. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers: San Francisco, CA, 2000; 438pp.
14. Wolfe JM. Visual search. In: Pashler H (Ed). Attention. Psychology Press: Hove, 1998; 13-73.
15. Lind M, Forsell C, Allard A. Effective visualizations for large displays - the role of transsaccadic memory. Third IASTED International Conference on Visualization, Imaging, and Image Processing 2003 (VIIP'03) (Benalmadena, Spain), Zurich; Switzerland, 1028-1033.
16. Caelli T, Bevan P. Probing the spatial frequency spectrum for orientation sensitivity in stochastic textures. Vision Research 1983; 23: 39-45.
17. Lightner NJ. Model testing of users' comprehension in graphical animation: the effect of speed and focus areas. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 2001; 13: 53-73.
18. Hochberg J. Perception as purposeful inquiry. Behavior and Brain Sciences 1999; 22: 619-620.
19. Irwin DE. Eye movements and perception. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes PB (Eds). International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier Science: 2001; 9: 5208-5210.
20. Lunneborg CE. Data Analysis by Resampling: Concepts and Applications. Duxbury: Pacific Grove, CA, 2000; 550pp.
21. Fredengren X. Symmetrical polygons as symbols for computer generated visualization. Unpublished master thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, 2003.
22. Garner WR. The Processing of Information and Structure. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, New York, NJ, 1974. 203pp.
23. Witkin A, Kass M. Reaction diffusion textures. Eight Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques SIGGRAPH'91 (Las Vegas, NV), ACM Press: New York, 1991; 35: 299-308.
24. Lowe DG. Perceptual Organization and Visual recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University: Stanford, CA, 1984.
25. Biederman I. Recognition-by-components - a theory of image understanding. Psychological Review 1987; 94: 115-147.