A concurrent model reduction approach on spatial and random domains for the solution of stochastic PDEs

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 66, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 1934-1954

  Acharjee, Swagato ^a   Zabaras, Nicholas ^a  

^a Cornell University   (United States)

Author keywords

Flow in porous media; Karhunen Lo ve expansion; Model reduction; Proper orthogonal decomposition; Spectral stochastic finite element method; Stochastic partial differential equations; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; POLYNOMIALS; POROSITY; POROUS MATERIALS; RANDOM PROCESSES;

MODEL REDUCTION; PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION; SPECTRAL STOCHASTIC FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; STOCHASTIC PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS;

FLUID MECHANICS;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FLUID MECHANICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; POLYNOMIALS; POROSITY; POROUS MATERIALS; RANDOM PROCESSES;

EID: 33745438681     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1611     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Doltsinis I, Kang Z. Robust design of structures using optimization methods. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2004; 193:2221-2237.
2. Doltsinis I, Kang Z, Cheng G. Robust design of non-linear structures using optimization methods. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2005, in press.
3. Grigoriu M, Saif S, El-Borgi MTA, Ingraffea A. Mixed-mode fracture initiation and trajectory prediction under random stresses. International Journal of Fracture 1990; 45:19-34.
4. Besterfield GH, Liu WK, Lawrence MA, Belytschko T. Fatigue crack growth reliability by probabilistic finite elements. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1991; 86:297-320.
5. Doltsinis I. Inelastic deformation processes with random parameters: methods of analysis and design. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2003; 192:2405-2423.
6. Borggaard J, Pelletier D, Turgeon E. Parametric uncertainty analysis for thermal fluid calculations. Nonlinear Analysis 2001; 47:4533-4543.
7. Turgeon E, Borggaard J, Pelletier D. Application of a sensitivity equation method to the k-ε model of turbulence. 15th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, 2001.
8. Godfrey A, Cliff E. Sensitivity equations for turbulent flows. 39th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit Conference, 2001.
9. Ghanem RG, Spanos PD. Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach. Springer: New York, 2001.
10. Schoutens W. Stochastic Processes and Orthogonal Polynomials. Springer: New York, 2000.
11. Xiu D, Lucor D, Su C-H, Kamiadakis GE. Stochastic modeling of flow-structure interactions using generalized polynomial chaos. Journal of Fluids Engineering 2001; 125:51-59.
12. Xiu D, Kamiadakis GE. Modeling uncertainty in steady state diffusion problems via generalized polynomial chaos. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2002; 191:4927-4948.
13. Xiu D, Kamiadakis GE. Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos. Journal of Computational Physics 2003; 187:137-167.
14. Xiu D, Kamiadakis GE. A new stochastic approach to transient heat conduction modeling with uncertainty. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 2003; 46:4681-4693.
15. Ghanem RG, Sarkar A. Mid-frequency structural dynamics with parameter uncertainty. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2002; 191:5499-5513.
16. Ghanem RG. Probabilistic characterization of transport in heterogeneous porous media. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1998; 158:199-220.
17. Anders M, Hori M. Stochastic finite element method for elasto-plastic body. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1999; 46:1897-1916.
18. Velamur Asokan B, Zabaras N. Stochastic inverse heat conduction using a spectral approach. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2004; 60:1569-1593.
19. Velamur Asokan B, Zabaras N. Variational multiscale stabilized FEM formulations for transport equations: stochastic advection-diffusion and incompressible stochastic Navier-Stokes equations. Journal of Computational Physics 2005; 202:94-133.
20. Acharjee S, Zabaras N. Uncertainty propagation in finite deformations - a spectral stochastic Lagrangian approach. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2004, submitted.
21. Lumley JL. The structure of inhomogeneous turbulence. In Atmospheric Turbulence and Radio Wave Propagation, Yaglom AM, Tatarski VI (eds). Nauka: Moscow, 1967; 166-178.
22. Lumley JL. The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 1993; 25:539-575.
23. Acharjee S, Zabaras N. A proper orthogonal decomposition approach to microstructure model reduction in Rodrigues space with applications to the control of material properties. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2003; 51:5627-5646.
24. Ganapathysubramanian S, Zabaras N. Design across length scales: a reduced-order model of polycrystal plasticity for the control of microstructure-sensitive material properties. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2004; 193:5017-5034.
25. Ravindran SS. A reduced-order approach for optimal control of fluids using proper orthogonal decomposition. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2000; 34:425-448.
26. Ravindran SS. Adaptive reduced-order controllers for a thermal flow system using proper orthogonal decomposition. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2002; 23:1924-1942.
27. Prabhu RD, Collis SS, Chang Y. The influence of control on proper orthogonal decomposition of wall-bounded turbulent flows. Physics of Fluids 2001; 13:520-537.
28. Trans HT, Ly HV. Modeling and control of physical processes using proper orthogonal decomposition. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 2001; 33:223-236.
29. Holmes P, Lumley JL, Berkooz G. Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry. Cambridge University Press: New York, 1998.
30. Christensen EA, Brons M, Sorensen JN. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2000; 21:1419-1434.
31. Xiu D, Kamiadakis GE. The Wiener-Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2002; 24:619-644.
32. Velamur Asokan B, Zabaras N. Using stochastic analysis to capture unstable equilibrium in natural convection. Journal of Computational Physics 2005; 208:134-153.
33. Shyy W, Udaykumar HS, Rao MM, Smith RW. Computational Fluid Dynamics with Moving Boundaries (1st edn). Taylor & Francis: Washington, DC, 1996.
34. Zabaras N, Samanta D. A stabilized volume-averaging finite element method for flow in porous media and binary alloy solidification processes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2004; 60:1103-1138.
35. Debusschere BJ, Najm HN, Pébay PP, Knio OM, Ghanem RG, Le Maître OP. Numerical challenges in the use of polynomial chaos representations for stochastic processes. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2004; 26:698-719.
36. Park HM, Lee MW. An efficient method of solving the Navier-Stokes equations for flow control. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1998; 41:1133-1151.
37. Iman RL, Conover WJ. Small sample sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models, with a application to risk assessment. Communications in Statistics 1980; A9:1749-1842.