From the subjects' point of view reactions to different types of situational judgment items

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 168-176

  Kanning, Uwe Peter ^a   Grewe, Kirsten ^a   Hollenberg, Stefan ^a   Hadouch, Monika ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Interactivity; Situational judgment test; Social validity; Video based testing

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745376771     PISSN: 10155759     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759.22.3.168     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Arvey, R.D., Strickland, W., Drauden, G., & Martin, C. (1990). Motivational components of test taking. Personnel Psychology, 43, 695-116.
2. Bauer, T.N., Truxillo, D.M., Paronto, M.E., Weekley, J.A., & Campion, M.A. (2004). Applicant reactions to different selection technology: Face-to-face, interactive voice response, and computer-assisted telephone screening interviews. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 135-148.
3. Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (2002). Situational judgment and job performance. Human Performance, 15, 233-254.
4. Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (2005). An agenda for future research on applicants reactions to selection procedures: A construct-oriented approach. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 9-23.
5. Chan, D., Schmitt, N., DeShon, R.P., Clause, C.S., & Delbridge, K. (1997). Reactions to cognitive ability tests: The relationships between race, test performance, face validity perceptions, and test-taking motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 300-310.
6. Cherry, B., Ordonez, L.D., & Gilliland, S.W. (2003). Grade expectations: The effects of expectations on fairness and satisfaction perception. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 375-395.
7. Clevenger, J., Pereira, G.M., Wiechmann, D., Schmitt, N., & Harvey, V.S. (2001). Incremental validity of situational judgment tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 410-417.
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Erlbaum.
9. Dalessio, A.T. (1994). Predicting insurance agent turnover using a video-based situational judgment test. Journal of Business and Psychology, 9, 23-32.
10. Drasgow, F., Olson-Buchanan, J.B., & Moberg, P.J, (1999). De velopment of an interactive video assessment: Trials and tribulations. In F. Drasgow (Ed.), Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 177-196). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Flanagan, J.C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 327-358.
12. Gilliland, S.W. (1993). The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 18, 694-734.
13. Gilliland, S.W., & Hale, J.M.S. (2005). How can justice be used to improve employee selection practice? In J. Greenberg & A. Jason (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 411-438). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Howard, A., & Choi, M. (2000). How do you assess a manager's decision-making abilities? The use of situational inventories. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 85-88.
15. Kanning, U.P. (2005). Computergestützte Personalauswahl von Polizeibeamten [Computer-based personnel selection of police officers]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organizationspsychologie, 49, 140-146.
16. Kravitz, D.A., Stinson, V., & Chavez, T.L. (1996). Evaluation of tests used for making selection and promotion decisions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 4, 24-35.
17. Lievens, F., DeCorte, W., & Brysse, K. (2003). Applicants perceptions of selection procedures: The role of selection information, belief in tests, and comparative anxiety. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 67-77.
18. McDaniel, M.A., & Nguyen, N.T. (2001). Situational judgment tests: A review of practice and constructs assessment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 103-113.
19. McDaniel, M.A., Morgeson, F.P., Finnemagan, E.B., Campion, M.A., & Braverman, E.P. (2001). Use of situational judgment tests to predict job performance: A clarification of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 730-740.
20. Motowidlo, S.J., Dunnette, M.D., & Carter, G.W. (1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 640-647.
21. Nguyen, N.T., & McDaniel, M.A. (2003). Response instruction and racial differences in a situational judgment test. Applied H.R.M. Research, 8, 33-44.
22. Olson-Buchanan, J.B., Drasgow, F., Moberg, P.J., Mead, A.D., Keenan, P.A., & Donovan, M.A. (1998). Interactive video assessment of conflict resolution skills. Personnel Psychology, 51, 1-24.
23. Oswald, F.L., Schmitt, N., Kim, B.H., Ramsay, L.J., & Gillespie, M.A. (2004). Developing a biodata measure and situational judgment inventory as predictors of college student performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 187-207.
24. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Polyhart, R.E., & Erhart, M.G. (2003). Be careful what you ask for: Effects of response instructions on the construct validity and reliability of situational judgment tests. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 1-16.
26. Ployhart, R.E., & Harold, C.M. (2004). The applicant attribution-reaction theory (AART): An integrative theory of applicant attributional processing. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 84-98.
27. Richman-Hirsch, W.L., Olson-Buchanan, J.B., & Drasgow, F. (2000). Examining the impact of administration medium on examinee perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 880-887.
28. Ryan, A.M., & Ployhart, R.E. (2000). Applicants' perceptions of selection procedures and decisions: A critical review and agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 26, 565-606.
29. Schmit, M.J., & Ryan, A.M. (1992). Test-taking dispositions: A missing link? Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 629-637.
30. Schmitt, N., & Gilliland, S.W. (1993). Computer-based testing applied to selection of secretarial applicants. Personnel Psychology, 46, 149-165.
31. Schuler, H. (1993). Social validity of selection situations: A concept and some empirical results. In H. Schuler, J.L. Farr, & M. Smith, M. (Eds.), Personnel selection and assessment: Individual and organizational perspectives (pp. 11-26). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Smiderle, D., Perry, B.A., & Cronshaw, S.F. (1994). Evaluation of video-based assessment in transit operator selection. Journal of Business and Psychology, 9, 3-22.
33. Steiner, D.D., & Gilliland, S.W. (1996). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 134-141.
34. Truxillo, D.M., Steiner, D.D., & Gilliland, S.W. (2004). The importance of organizational justice in personnel selection: Defining when selection fairness really matters. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 39-53.
35. Weekley, J.A., & Jones, C. (1997). Video-based situational testing, Personnel Psychology, 50, 25-49.
36. Weekley, J.A., & Ployhart, R.E. (2005). Situational judgment: Antecedents and relationships with performance. Human Performance, 18, 81-104.
37. Wiechmann, D., & Ryan, A.M. (2003). Reactions to computerized testing in selection contexts. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 215-229.