Pre-operative simulation and post-operative validation of soft-tissue deformations for breast implantation planning

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 6141, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Roose, Liesbet ^a   De Maerteleire, Wim ^b   Mollemans, Wouter ^a   Maes, Frederik ^a   Suetens, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b 3D Medical BV   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Augmentation Mammoplasty; Finite Element method; Image Guided Therapy; Mass Tensor Method; Procedure Simulation; Soft Tissue Simulation; Surgery Planning

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT TREATMENT; TENSORS; TISSUE;

AUGMENTATION MAMMOPLASTY; IMAGE-GUIDED THERAPY; MASS TENSOR METHOD; PROCEDURE SIMULATION; SOFT TISSUE SIMULATION; SURGERY PLANNING;

IMPLANTS (SURGICAL);

EID: 33745350486     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.648426     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. B. Stewart and P. Kleihues, World cancer report, Oxford University Press, 2003.
2. D. Hudson, "Factors determining shape and symmetry in immediate breast reconstruction," Annals of Plastic surgery 52, pp. 15-21, January 2004.
3. G. M. Galdino, M. Nahabedian, M. Chiaramonte, J. Z. Geng, S. Klatsky, and P. Manson, "Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery," Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 110, pp. 58-70, July 2002.
4. A. Samani, J.Bishop, M. Yaffe, and D. Plewes, "Biomechanical 3-D finite element modeling of the human breast for mr/x-ray using mri data," IEEE transactions on medical imaging 20, pp. 271-279, April 2001.
5. N. Ruiter, Registration of X-ray mammograms and MR-volumes of the female breast based on simulated mammographic deformation. PhD thesis, Universitaet Mannheim, 2003.
6. L. Roose, W. D. Maerteleire, W. Mollemans, and P. Suetens, "Validation of different soft tissue simulation methods for breast augmentation," in Computer assisted radiology and surgery, H. U. Lemke, ed., ICS 1281, 2005.
7. S. Cotin, H. Delingette, and N. Ayache, "A hybrid elastic model allowing real-time cutting, deformations and force-feedback for surgery training and simulation," The Visual Computer 16(7), pp. 437-452, 2000.
8. S. L. Spear, E. J. Bulan, and M. L. Venturi, "Breast augmentation," Plastic and Reconstructive surgery 114(5), 2004.
9. R. Franke, "Scattered data interpolation; tests of some methods," Mathematics of computation 38, pp. 181-200, January 1982.
10. J. C. Carr, W. R. Fright, and R. K. Beatson, "Surface interpolation with radial basis functions for medical imaging," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 16, p. 96107, February 1997.
11. "Netgen." http://www.hpfem.jku.at/netgen/.
12. C. Tanner, A. Degenhard, C. Hayes, L. Sonoda, M. Leach, D. Hose, D. Hill, and D. Hawkes, "Comparison of biornechanical breast models: A case study," in Medical Imaging: Image Processing, Proc. SPIE 4683, pp. 716-731, 2002.
13. P. Bakic, Breast Tissue Description and Modeling in Marnmography. PhD thesis, Lehigh University, USA, 2000.
14. W. Mollemans, F. Schutyser, N. Nadjmi, and P. Suetens, "Very fast soft tissue predictions with mass tensor model for maxillofacial surgery planning systems," in Computer assisted radiology and surgery, H. U. Lemke, ed., ICS 1281, 2005.
15. P. J. Besl and N. D. McKay, "A method for registration of 3-D shapes," IEEE Trans. Pat. Anal. and Mach. Intel. 14, pp. 239-256, February 1992.