Transdisciplinary studies of surgical oncology trial accrual: A National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute Roadmap-affiliated project update

Cancer

Volumn 107, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 171-174

  Albrecht, Terrance L ^a   Kuerer, Henry ^b   Ruckdeschel, John C ^a   Mendez, Jane ^c   Harper, Felicity ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

American College of Surgeons Oncology Group; Methodologies; Surgical trial accrual; Transdisciplinary research

Indexed keywords

CANCER SURGERY; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; CLINICAL TRIALS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); NEOPLASMS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33745318854     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21966     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Wells SA. Clinical research in surgery: the role of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group. J Surg Oncol. 2003;84:181-184.
2. Wright FR, Whelan TJ, Schiff S, et al. Why cancer patients enter randomized clinical trials: exploring the factors that influence their decision. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4312-4318.
3. Kaas R, Hart AM, Rutgers EJ. The impact of the physician on the accrual to randomized clinical trials in patients with primary operable breast cancer. Breast. 2005;14:310-316.
4. Albrecht TL, Penner LA, Ruckdeschel JC. Understanding patient decisions about clinical trials: studying communication processes. Cancer Ethic. 2003;18:210-214.
5. Albrecht TL. Strategic physician communication and patient decision making about clinical trials. Presented at the Fourth Annual American Association for Cancer Research International Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, October 30 to November 2, 2005.
6. Albrecht TL, Ruckdeschel, JC, Ray, FL, et al. A portable, unobtrusive device for video recording clinical interactions. Behav Res Methods. 2005;37:165-169.
7. Suls J, Rothman A. Evolution of the biosychosocial model: prospects and challenges for health psychology. Health Psychol. 2004;23:119-125.
8. Montgomery C, Lydon A, Lloyd K. Psychological distress among cancer patients and informed consent. J Psychosom Res. 1999;46:241-245.
9. Albrecht TL, Franks M, Ruckdeschel JC. Communication and informed consent. Curr Opin Oncol. 2005;17:336-399.
10. Blascovich J, Seery MD, Mugridge CA, Norris RK, Weisbuch M. Predicting athletic performance from cardiovascular indexes of challenge and threat. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2004;40:683-688.
11. Tomamichel M, Sessa C, Herzig S, et al. Informed consent for Phase 1 studies: evaluation of quantity and quality of information provided to patients. Ann Oncol. 1995;6:363-369.
12. Eggly S, Penner LA, Albrecht TL, et al. Discussing "bad news" in the outpatient oncology clinic: rethinking current communication guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:716-719.
13. Cutrona CE. Social support in couples. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1996.
14. Albrecht TL, Blanchard CG, Ruckdeschel JC, Coovert M, Strongbow R. Strategic physician communication and oncology clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:3324-3332.
15. Bolger N, Davis A, Rafaeli E. Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived. Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:579-616.
16. Kirschbaum C, Wolf OT, May M, Wippich W, Hellhammer DH. Stress- and treatment-induced elevations of cortisol levels associated with impaired declarative memory in healthy adults. Life Sci. 1996;58:1475-1483.
17. Magnusson MS. Discovering hidden time patterns in behavior: T-patterns and their detection. Behav Res Methods. 2000;32:93-110.