A portable, unobtrusive device for videorecording clinical interactions

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 165-169

  Albrecht, Terrance L ^a,b   Ruckdeschel, John C ^a   Ray III, Fountain L ^c   Pethe, Ben J ^d   Riddle, Dawn L ^e   Strohm, Joan ^f   Penner, Louis A ^a,b   Coovert, Michael D ^e   Quinn, Gwendolyn ^f   Blanchard, Christina G ^d  

^a KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Profile East   (United States)

^d University of South Florida ^*

^e UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^f H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELECTRONICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INSTRUMENTATION; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PRIVACY; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VIDEORECORDING;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MINIATURIZATION; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PRIVACY; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 25144505283     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206411     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. BAVELAS, J. B. (1994). Gestures as part of speech: Methodological implications. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 27, 201-221.
2. BAVELAS, J. B., CHOVIL, N., COATES, L., & ROE, L. (1995). Gestures specialized for dialogue. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 394-405.
3. The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research (1979, April 18). Bethesda, MD: Office of Human Subjects Research.
4. BURGOON, J. (1994). Nonverbal signals. In M. N. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 229-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. FORD, S., HALL, A., RATCLIFFE, D., & FALLOWFIELD, L. (2000). The Medical Interaction Process System (MIPS): An instrument for analyzing interviews of oncologists and patients with cancer. Social Science & Medicine, 50, 553-566.
6. ICKES, W. (1994). Methods of studying close relationships. In A. Weber & J. Harvey (Eds.), Perspectives on close relationships (pp. 18-44). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7. ICKES, W., & TOOKE, W. (1988). The observational method: Studying the interaction of minds and bodies. In S. Duck & S. Hay (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions (pp. 79-97). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
8. JONES, S. E., & LEBARON, C. D. (2002). Guest editors' introduction. Journal of Communication, 52, 499-522.
9. NUREMBERG CODE (1949). In Trials of war criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Vol. 2 (pp. 181-182). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
10. RIDDLE, D. L., ALBRECHT, T. L., COUVERT, M. D., PENNER, L. A., RUCKDESCHEL. J. C., BLANCHARD, C. G., URBIZU, D., & QUINN, G. (2002). Differences in audiotaped versus videotaped physician-patient interactions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 26, 219-240.
11. ROTER, D. L., GELLER, G.. BERNHARDT, B. A., LARSON, S. M., & DOKSUM, T. (1999). Effects of obstetrician gender on communication and patient satisfaction. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 93, 635-641.