CT angiography of peripheral arterial disease

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 3-26

  Fleischmann, Dominik ^a,b   Hallett, Richard L ^a   Rubin, Geoffrey D ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; IODINE;

ANEURYSM; ARTERY DISEASE; BODY MASS; BREATH HOLDING; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION; LEG REVASCULARIZATION; LIMB ISCHEMIA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PATIENT POSITIONING; PERIODIC MEDICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME; TREATMENT PLANNING; ULTRASOUND; ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; METHODOLOGY; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INJECTIONS, INTRAVENOUS; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33745307628     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000191361.02857.DE     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Lawrence JA, Kim D, Kent KC, et al. Lower extremity spiral CT angiography versus catheter angiography. Radiology 1995; 194:903-908.
2. Rieker O, Duber C, Schmiedt W, et al. Prospective comparison of CT angiography of the legs with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166:269-276.
3. Beregi JP, Elkohen M, Deklunder G, et al. Helical CT angiography compared with arteriography in the detection of renal artery stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167:495-501.
4. Kramer SC, Gorich J, Aschoff AJ, et al. Diagnostic value of spiral-CT angiography in comparison with digital subtraction angiography before and after peripheral vascular intervention. Angiology 1998; 49:599-606.
5. Soto JA, Munera F, Morales C, et al. Focal arterial injuries of the proximal extremities: helical CT arteriography as the initial method of diagnosis. Radiology 2001; 218:188-194.
6. Rubin GD, Schmidt AJ, Logan LJ, et al. Multidetector-row CT angiography of lower extremity occlusive disease: a new application for CT scanning. Radiology 1999; 210:588.
7. Rubin GD, Schmidt AJ, Logan LJ, et al. Multi-detector row CT angiography of lower extremity arterial inflow and runoff: initial experience. Radiology 2001; 221:146-158.
8. Ofer A, Nitecki SS, Linn S, et al. Multidetector CT angiography of peripheral vascular disease: a prospective comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180:719-724.
9. Martin ML, Tay KH, Flak B, et al. Multidetector CT angiography of the aortoiliac system and lower extremities: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180:1085-1091.
10. Ota H, Takase K, Igarashi K, et al. MDCT compared with digital subtraction angiography for assessment of lower extremity arterial occlusive disease: importance of reviewing cross-sectional images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182:201-209.
11. Catalano C, Fraioli F, Laghi A, et al. Infrarenal aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease: diagnostic performance of multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 2004; 231:555-563.
12. Fleischmann D, Rubin GD, Paik DS, et al. Stair-step artifacts with single versus multiple detector-row helical CT. Radiology 2000; 216:185-196.
13. Hartnell GG. Contrast angiography and MR angiography: still not optimum. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999; 10:99-100.
14. Fleischmann D. Use of high-concentration contrast media in multiple-detector-row CT: principles and rationale. Eur Radiol 2003; 13(suppl 5):M14-M20.
15. Fleischmann D, Hittmair K. Mathematical analysis of arterial enhancement and optimization of bolus geometry for CT angiography using the discrete Fourier transform. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999; 23:474-484.
16. Fleischmann D, Rubin GD, Bankier AA, et al. Improved uniformity of aortic enhancement with customized contrast medium injection protocols at CT angiography. Radiology 2000; 214:363-371.
17. Bron KM. Femoral arteriography. In: Abrams HL, ed. Abrams angiography: vascular and interventional radiology, 3rd ed. Boston: LittleBrown, 1983:1835-1875.
18. Versteylen RJ, Lampmann LE. Knee time in femoral arteriography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989; 152:203.
19. Fleischmann D, Rubin GD. Quantification of intravenously administered contrast medium transit through the peripheral arteries: implications for CT angiography. Radiology 2005; 236:1076-1082.
20. Portugaller HR, Schoellnast H, Hausegger KA, et al. Multislice spiral CT angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease: a valuable tool in detecting significant arterial lumen narrowing? Eur Radiol 2004; 14:1681-1687.
21. Qanadli SD, Chiappori V, Kelekis A, et al. Multislice computed tomography of peripheral arterial disease: New approach to optimize vascular opacification with 16-row platform. Eur Radiol 2004; 14 Suppl. 2:S304.
22. Milne EN. The significance of early venous filling during femoral arteriography. Radiology 1967; 88:513-8.
23. Koechl A, Kanitsar A, Lomoschitz E, et al. Comprehensive assessment of peripheral arteries using multi-path curved planar reformation of CTA datasets. Eur Radiol 2003; 13:268-269.
24. Kanitsar A, Fleischmann D, Wegenkittl R, et al. CPR - curved planar reformation. In: IEEE Visualization. Boston: IEEE Computer Society; 2002;37-44.
25. Raman R, Napel S, Beaulieu CF, et al. Automated generation of curved planar reformations from volume data: method and evaluation. Radiology 2002; 223:275-280.
26. Fleischmann D, Kanitsar A, Lomoschitz E, et al. Multi-path curved planar reformation of the peripheral arterial tree. Radiology 2002; 225:363.
27. Napel S, Rubin GD, Jeffrey RB Jr. STS-MIP: a new reconstruction technique for CT of the chest. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17:832-838.
28. Raman R, Napel S, Rubin GD. Curved-slab maximum intensity projection: method and evaluation. Radiology 2003; 229:255-260.
29. Edwards AJ, Wells IP, Roobottom CA. Multidetector row CT angiography of the lower limb arteries: a prospective comparison of volume-rendered techniques and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography. Clin Radiol 2005; 60:85-95.
30. Willmann JK, Baumert B, Schertler T, et al. Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries assessed with 16-detector row CT angiography: prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2005; 236:1083-1093.
31. Ouwendijk R, de Vries M, Pattynama PM, et al. Imaging peripheral arterial disease: a randomized controlled trial comparing contrast-enhanced MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 2005; 236:1094-1103.
32. Hiatt WR. Medical treatment of peripheral arterial disease and claudication. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:1608-1621.
33. Hiatt WR. Pharmacologic therapy for peripheral arterial disease and claudication. J Vasc Surg 2002; 36:1283-1291.
34. Stewart KJ, Hiatt WR, Regensteiner JG, et al. Exercise training for claudication. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:1941-1951.
35. de Vries SO, Visser K, de Vries JA, et al. Intermittent claudication: cost-effectiveness of revascularization versus exercise therapy. Radiology 2002; 222:25-36.
36. Pentecost MJ, Criqui MH, Dorros G, et al. Guidelines for peripheral percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the abdominal aorta and lower extremity vessels. A statement for health professionals from a special writing group of the Councils on Cardiovascular Radiology, Arteriosclerosis, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention, the American Heart Association. Circulation 1994; 89:511-531.
37. Dormandy JA, Rutherford RB. Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). TASC Working Group. Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC). J Vasc Surg 2000; 31(suppl):S1-S296.
38. Surowiec SM, Davies MG, Eberly SW, et al. Percutaneous angioplasty and stenting of the superficial femoral artery. J Vasc Surg 2005; 41:269-278.
39. Clark TW, Groffsky JL, Soulen MC. Predictors of long-term patency after femoropopliteal angioplasty: results from the STAR registry. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12:923-933.
40. Reekers JA, Bolia A. Percutaneous intentional extraluminal (subintimal) recanalization: how to do it yourself. Eur J Radiol 1998; 28:192-198.
41. Tisi PV, Mirnezami A, Baker S, et al. Role of subintimal angioplasty in the treatment of chronic lower limb ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002; 24:417-422.
42. Saketkhoo RR, Razavi MK, Padidar A, et al. Percutaneous bypass: subintimal recanalization of peripheral occlusive disease with IVUS guided luminal re-entry. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 7:23-27.
43. Nadal LL, Cynamon J, Lipsitz EC, et al. Subintimal angioplasty for chronic arterial occlusions. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 7:16-22.
44. Hirai T, Korogi Y, Ono K, et al. Maximum stenosis of extracranial internal carotid artery: effect of luminal morphology on stenosis measurement by using CT angiography and conventional DSA. Radiology 2001; 221:802-809.
45. Visser K, de Vries SO, Kitslaar PJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic imaging work-up and treatment for patients with intermittent claudication in The Netherlands. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2003; 25:213-223.
46. Rubin GD, Armerding MD, Dake MD, et al. Cost identification of abdominal aortic aneurysm imaging by using time and motion analyses. Radiology 2000; 215:63-70.
47. Clair DG, Dayal R, Faries PL, et al. Tibial angioplasty as an alternative strategy in patients with limb-threatening ischemia. Ann Vasc Surg 2005; 19:63-68.
48. Dorros G, Jaff MR, Murphy KJ, et al. The acute outcome of tibioperoneal vessel angioplasty in 417 cases with claudication and critical limb ischemia. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998; 45:251-256.
49. Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C, et al. Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg 1997; 26:517-538.
50. Costantini V, Lenti M. Treatment of acute occlusion of peripheral arteries. Thromb Res 2002; 106:V285-V294.
51. Willmann JK, Mayer D, Banyai M, et al. Evaluation of peripheral arterial bypass grafts with multi-detector row CT angiography: comparison with duplex US and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2003; 229:465-474.
52. Mills JL, Harris EJ, Taylor LM Jr, et al. The importance of routine surveillance of distal bypass grafts with duplex scanning: a study of 379 reversed vein grafts. J Vasc Surg 1990; 12:379-386.
53. Moody P, Gould DA, Harris PL. Vein graft surveillance improves patency in femoro-popliteal bypass. Eur J Vasc Surg 1990; 4:117-21.
54. Karcaaltincaba M, Akata D, Aydingoz U, et al. Three-dimensional MDCT angiography of the extremities: clinical applications with emphasis on musculoskeletal uses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183:113-117.
55. Whitley SP, Sandhu S, Cardozo A. Preoperative vascular assessment of the lower limb for harvest of a fibular flap: the views of vascular surgeons in the United Kingdom. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 42:307-310.
56. Klein MB, Karanas YL, Chow LC, et al. Early experience with computed tomographic angiography in microsurgical reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112:498-503.
57. Karanas YL, Antony A, Rubin G, et al. Preoperative CT angiography for free fibula transfer. Microsurgery 2004; 24:125-127.
58. Chow LC, Napoli A, Klein MB, et al. Vascular mapping of the leg with multi-detector row CT angiography prior to free-flap transplantation. Radiology 2005; 237:353-360.
59. Takase K, Imakita S, Kuribayashi S, et al. Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome: aberrant origin of gastrocnemius muscle shown by 3D CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21:523-528.