Ascertaining the views of people with profound and multiple learning disabilities

British Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 175-179

  Ware, Jean ^a  

^a DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Decision making; Inference; Profound intellectual disabilities; Teaching; Views

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745303940     PISSN: 13544187     EISSN: 14683156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3156.2004.00316.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. ACCAC (in press). Insight (WORKING TITLE) Assessment materials for learners with profound learning difficulties and additional disabilities. http://www.ACCAC.org.uk.
2. Appelbaum P. & Roth L. (1982) Competence to consent to research: a psychiatric overview. Archives Gen Psychiatry, 39: 951-8.
3. Cea C., Fisher C. (2003) Health care decision making by adults with mental retardation. Ment Retard, 41: 78-87.
4. Clegg J. (2003) Using narrative diaries. Paper presented at the ESRC seminar series methodological issues in interviewing people with learning difficulties: 4. Exploring the use of innovative methods, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, March 2003.
5. Cummins R. (2002) Proxy responding for subjective well-being: a review. In: Ellis N., Bray N., Glidden L., editors. International review of research in mental retardation, Vol. 25. San Diego, CA, Academic Press: 183-207.
6. DoH (1989) The Children Act. London, HMSO.
7. DfES (2001a) SEN toolkit. London, HMSO.
8. DfES (2001b) Special educational needs - code of practice. London, HMSO.
9. Felce D. (2002) Gaining views from people with learning disabilities: authenticity, validity and reliability. Paper presented at the ESRC seminar series: methodological issues in interviewing children and young people with learning difficulties, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, March 2003.
10. Germain R. (2003) Using cameras and talking mats. Paper presented at the ESRC seminar series: methodological issues in interviewing people with learning difficulties, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, March 2003.
11. Gettings D., Gladstone C. (2003) Using ICT. Paper presented at the ESRC seminar series methodological issues in interviewing people with learning difficulties: 4. Exploring the use of innovative methods, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, March 2003.
12. Green C.W., Reid D.H., White L.K., Halford R.C., Brittain D.P. et al. (1988) Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences. J Appl Behav Anal, 21: 31-43.
13. Green C.W., Reid D.H., Canipe V.S., Gardner S.M. (1991) A comprehensive evaluation of reinforcer identification processes for persons with profound multiple handicaps. J Appl Behav Anal, 24: 537-52.
14. Grove N., Porter J., Bunning K., Olsson C. (1999) Interpreting the meaning of communication by people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities: theoretical and methodological issues. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil, 23: 190-203.
15. Kearney C.A., McKnight T.J. (1997) Preference, choice, and persons with disabilities: a synopsis of assessments, interventions and future directions. Clin Psychol Rev, 17: 217-38.
16. Lancioni G., O'Reilly M., Emerson E. (1996) A review of choice research with people with severe and profound developmental disabilities. Res Dev Disabil, 17: 391-411.
17. Murphy G. (2004) Keynote Address to the 12th IASSID World Congress, Montpellier, France, 14-19 June 2004.
18. Norwich B. (1997) Exploring the perspectives of adolescents with moderate learning disabilities on their schooling and themselves. Eur J Spec Needs Educ, 12: 38-53.
19. Porter J., Ouvry C., Morgan M., Downs C. (2001) Interpreting the communication of people with profound and multiple learning difficulties. Br J Learn Disabil, 29: 12-6.
20. Sanderson H. (1998) Person centred planning. In: Lacey P., Ouvry C., editors. People with profound and multiple disabilities: a collaborative approach to meeting complex needs. London, Fulton: 130-45.
21. Schepis M., Reid D., Behrman M. (1996) Acquisition and functional use of voice output communication by persons with profound multiple disabilities. Behav Modif, 20: 451-68.
22. Schweigert P., Rowland C. (1992) Early communication and microtechnology: instructional sequence and case studies of children with severe multiple disabilities. Augment Altern Commun, 8: 273-86.
23. Sinnott v Minister for Education and the Attorney General (2000) Judgement delivered by Mr Justice Barr on the 4th day of October 2000.
24. United Nations (1989) Convention on the rights of the child. Geneva, United Nations.
25. Wilcox M.J., Kouri T.A., Caswell S. (1990) Partner sensitivity to communication behavior of young children with developmental disabilities. J Speech Hearing Disord, 55: 679-93.