Study on the fracture strength of root reconstructed with post and core: Alveolar bone resorbed case

Dental Materials Journal

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 177-182

  Komada, Wataru ^a   Miura, Hiroyuki ^a   Okada, Daizo ^a   Yoshida, Keiichi ^a  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Alveolar bone; Fracture strength; Glass fiber post

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; HUMAN; INJURY; OSTEOLYSIS; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH ROOT;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; HUMANS; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH ROOT;

EID: 33745244106     PISSN: 02874547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.25.177     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Schmalz G, Garthammer P. Biological interactions of dental cast alloys with oral tissues. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 396-406.
2. Iglesia-Puig MA, Arellano-Cabornero A. Fiber-reinforced post and core adapted to a previous metal ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 191-194.
3. Bergman B, Lundquist P, Sjogren U, Sundquist G. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 10-15.
4. Creugers NH, Mentink AG, Kayser AF. An analysis of durability of data on post and core restoration. J Dent 1993; 21: 281-284.
5. Perel ML, Muroff FI. Clinical criteria for posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1972; 28: 405-411.
6. Stern N, Hirshfeld Z. Principles of preparing endodontically treated teeth for dowel and core restoration. J Prosthet Dent 1973; 30: 162-165.
7. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999; 27: 275-278.
8. Martinez-Insua A, da Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 527-532.
9. Trope M, Maltz DO, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985; 1: 108-111.
10. Sirimai S, Riis DN, Morgano SM. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence of vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 262-269.
11. Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 431-437.
12. Bayindir YZ, Bayindir F, Akyil SM. Bond strength of permanent cements in cementing cast to crown different core build-up materials. Dent Mater J 2004; 23: 117-120.
13. Inoue S, Murata Y, Sano H, Kashiwada T. Effect of NaOCl treatment on bond strength between indirect resin core-buildup and dentin. Dent Mater J 2002; 21: 343-354.
14. Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Nikaido T, Harada N, Inokoshi S, Yamada T, Takatsu T. Shear and tensile bond testing for resin cement evaluation. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 298-304.
15. Kanno T, Ogata M, Foxton RM, Nakajima M, Tagami J, Miura H. Microtensile bond strength of dual-cure resin cement to root canal dentin with different curing strategies. Dent Mater J 2004; 23: 550-556.
16. Liu J, Hattori M, Hasegawa K, Yoshinari M, Kawada E, Oda Y. Effect of tubule orientation and dentin location on the microtensile strength of bovine root dentin. Dent Mater J 2002; 21: 73-82.
17. Inoue S, Pereira PN, Kawamoto C, Nakajima M, Koshiro K, Tagami J, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH, Sano H. Effect of depth and tubule direction on ultimate tensile strength of human coronal dentin. Dent Mater J 2003; 22: 73-82.
18. Cagidiaco M.C, Ferrari M, Vichi A, Davidson C.L. Mapping of tubule and intertubule surface areas available for bonding in Class V and Class II preparations. J Dent 1997; 25: 379-389.
19. Ozturk B, Özer F. Effect of NaOCl on bond strengths of bonding agents to pulp chamber lateral walls. J Endod 2004; 30: 362-365.
20. Harrison JW, Svec TA, Baumgartner JC. Analysis of clinical toxicity of endodontic irrigants. J Endod 1978; 4: 6-11.
21. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Condos S, Deutsch AS. Four different core materials measured for fracture strength in combination with five different designs of endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76: 487-495.
22. Goto Y, Nicholls JI, Phillips KM, Junge T. Fatigue resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three dowel-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 45-50.
23. Dietschi D, Romelli M, Goretti A. Adaptation of adhesive posts and cores to dentin after fatigue testing. Int J Prosthodont 1997; 10: 498-507.
24. Al-harbi F, Nathanson D. In vitro assessment of retention of four esthetic dowels to resin core foundation and teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 547-555.
25. Akkayan B. An in vitro study evaluating the effect of ferrule length on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced and zirconia dowel systems. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 155-162.
26. Siher H, DuBrul EL. Oral Anatomy, 6th ed, CV Mosby, St. Louis, 1975, pp.234-236.
27. Bolhuis HPB, De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL. Fracture strength of different core build-up designs. Am J Dent 2001; 14: 286-290.