Use of a new cardiac pacing mode designed to eliminate unnecessary ventricular pacing

Europace

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 96-101

  Fröhlig, Gerd ^a   Gras, Daniel ^b   Victor, Jacques ^c   Mabo, Philippe ^d   Galley, Daniel ^e   Savouré, Arnaud ^f   Jauvert, Gaël ^g   Defaye, Pascal ^h   Ducloux, Pascale ⁱ   Amblard, Amel ⁱ  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Nouvelles Cliniques Nantaises   (France)

^c ANGERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^d RENNES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^e CHG d'Albi   (France)

^f ROUEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^g Clinique Bizet   (France)

^h GRENOBLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

ⁱ ELA Recherche   (France)

Author keywords

Atrial pacing; Atrioventricular conduction; Dual chamber pacing; Sinus node dysfunction; Ventricular pacing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK; BRADYCARDIA; CARDIOVASCULAR EQUIPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM PACING; HEART VENTRICLE PACING; HOLTER MONITORING; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SAFETY; SINUS NODE DYSFUNCTION; TACHYCARDIA;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARRHYTHMIA; CARDIAC PACING, ARTIFICIAL; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY, AMBULATORY; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART ATRIA; HEART VENTRICLES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; SINOATRIAL NODE; SYNDROME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33745238685     PISSN: 10995129     EISSN: 15322092     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/europace/euj024     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Gregoratos G, Abrams J, Epstein AE et al. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices-summary article: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1703-19.
2. Nielsen JC, Kristensen L, Andersen HR et al. A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: Echocardiographic and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:614-23.
3. Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE et al. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial. JAMA 2002; 288:3115-23.
4. Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA et al. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation 2003;107:2932-37.
5. Savoure A, Frohlig G, Galley D et al. A new dual-chamber pacing mode to minimize ventricular pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005; 28(Suppl. 1):S43-46.
6. Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE et al. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet 1997;350:1210-16.
7. Mattioli AV, Vivoli D, Mattioti G. Influence of pacing modalities on the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients without prior atrial fibrillation. A prospective study. Eur Heart J 1998;19:282-6.
8. Kerr CR, Connolly SJ, Abdollah H et al. Canadian Trial of Physiological Pacing: Effects of physiological pacing during long-term follow-up. Circulation 2004;109:357-62.
9. Lamas GA, Orav EJ, Stambler BS et al. Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing. Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly Investigators. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1097-104.
10. Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO et al. Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1854-62.
11. Toff WD, Camm AJ, Skehan JD. Single-chamber versus dual-chamber pacing for high-grade atrioventricular block. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:145-55.
12. Brignole M, Alboni P, Benditt D et al. Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope. Update 2004. Europace 2004;6:467-537.
13. Andersen HR, Thuesen L, Bagger JP et al. Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet 1994;344:1523-8.
14. Rosenqvist M and Obel IW. Atrial pacing and the risk for AV block: Is there a time for change in attitude? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1989;12:97-101.
15. Brandt J, Anderson H, Fåhraeus T et al. Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: Implications for selection of stimulation mode. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:633-9.
16. Kristensen L, Nielsen JC, Pedersen AK et al. AV block and changes in pacing mode during long-term follow-up of 399 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome treated with an AAI/AAIR pacemaker. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001;24:358-65.
17. Haywood GA, Ward J, Ward DE et al. Atrioventricular Wenckebach point and progression to atrioventricular block in sinoatrial disease. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1990;13:2054-8.
18. Mabo P, Pouillot C, Kermarrec A et al. Lack of physiological adaptation of the atrioventricular interval to heart rate in patients chronically paced in the AAIR mode. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1991;14:2133-42.
19. Lemke B, Nowak B, Pfeiffer D. Leitlinien zur Herzschrittmachertherapie. http://www dgk org/leitlinien/LLHerzschrittmacher (2005).
20. Brignole M, Sartore B, Barra M et al. Ventricular and dual chamber pacing for treatment of carotid sinus syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1989;12:582-90.
21. Gaggioli G, Brignole M, Menozzi C et al. Reappraisal of the vasodepressor reflex in carotid sinus syndrome. Am J Cardiol 1995;75:518-21.
22. Mabo P, Druelles P, Kermarrec A et al. Haemodynamic mechanism of arterial hypotension in carotid sinus syndrome and of prevention by dual chamber pacing. Eur J Cardiac Pacing Electrophysiol 1992;2:129-38.
23. Nielsen JC, Pedersen AK, Mortensen PT et al. Programming a fixed long atrioventricular delay is not effective in preventing ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Europace 1999;1:113-20.
24. Stierle U, Kruger D, Vincent AM et al. An optimized AV delay algorithm for patients with intermittent atrioventricular conduction. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:1035-43.
25. Girodo S, Ritter P, Pioger G et al. Improved dual chamber pacing mode in paroxysmal atrioventricular conduction disorders. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1990;13:2059-64.
26. Mayumi H, Kohno H, Yasui H et al. Use of automatic mode change between DDD and AAI to facilitate native atrioventricular conduction in patients with sick sinus syndrome or transient atrioventricular block. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996;19:1740-47.
27. Blanc JJ, De Roy L, Mansourati J et al. Atrial pacing for prevention of atrial fibrillation: Assessment of simultaneously implemented algorithms. Europace 2004;6:371-79.
28. Sweeney MO, Shea JB, Fox V et al. Randomized pilot study of a new atrial-based minimal ventricular pacing mode in dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Heart Rhythm 2004;1:160-7.
29. Sweeney MO, Ellenbogen KA, Casavant D et al. Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Safety and Efficacy Study of a new atrial-based managed ventricular pacing Mode (MVP) in dual chamber ICDs. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005;16:811-17.