How can the study of aging inform research on social cognition?

Social Cognition

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 207-217

  Blanchard Fields, Fredda ^a,b   Horhota, Michelle ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Georgia Institute of Psychology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745212268     PISSN: 0278016X     EISSN: 0278016X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/soco.2006.24.3.207     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Abeles, R. (1999). In T. Hess & F. Blanchard-Fields (Eds.), Preface. Social cognition and aging (pp. 1-14). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
2. Barden, J., Maddux, W.W., Petty, R.E., & Brewer, M.B. (2004). Contextual moderation of racial bias: The impact of social roles on controlled, and automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 5-22.
3. Blanchard-Fields, F. (1994). Age differences in causal attributions from an adult developmental perspective. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 49B, 43-51.
4. Blanchard-Fields, F. (1996). Causal attributions across the adult life span: The influence of social schemas, life context, and domain specificity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 137-146.
5. Blanchard-Fields, F., & Abeles, R. P. (1996). Social cognition and aging. In J. E. Birren, & K.W. Schaie (Eds), Handbook of the psychology of aging. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
6. Blanchard-Fields, F., & Beatty, C. (2005). Age Differences in Blame Attributions: The role of relationship outcome ambiguity and personal identification. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 60B, 19-26.
7. Blanchard-Fields, F., & Hertzog, C. (2000). Age differences in schematicity. In U. von Hecker, S. Dutke, & G. Sedek (Eds.), Processes of generative mental representation and psychological adaptation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Klu wer.
8. Blanchard-Fields, F., & Hess, T. M. (1999). The social cognitive perspective and the shady of aging. In T. Hess & F. Blanchard-Fields (Eds.), Social cognition and aging (pp. 1-14). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9. Blanchard-Fields, P., & Horhota, M. (2005). Age differences in the correspondence bias: When a plausible explanation matters. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 60B, 259-267.
10. Chasteen, A.L., Bhattacharyya, S., Horhota, M., Tam, R., Hasher, L. (2005). How feelings of stereotype threat influence older adults' memory performance. Experimental Aging Research, 31, 235-260.
11. Chen, Y. (2004) Age differences in correction of context-induced biases: Source monitoring and timing of accountability. Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition, 11, 58-67.
12. Giles, H., Fox, S., & Harwood, J. (1994). Talking age and aging talk: Communicating through the life span. In M.L. Hummert & J.M. Wiemann (Eds.), Interpersonal communication in older adulthood: Interdisciplinary theory and research (pp. 130-161). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
13. Hess, T. M., Auman, C., Colcombe, S. J., & Rahhal, T. A. (2003) The impact of stereotype threat on age differences in memory performance. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58, 3-11
14. Hess, T. M., Follett, K.J., & McGee, K.A. (1998). Aging and impression formation: The impact of age-related differences in processing skills and goals. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 530, 175-187.
15. Hess, T.M., Germain, C.M., Rosenberg, D.C., Leclere, C.M., & Hodges, E.A. (2005). Aging-related selectivity and susceptibility to irrelevant affective information in the construction of attitudes. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 12, 149-174.
16. Hess, T.M., Rosenberg, D.C., & Waters, S.J. (2001). Motivation and representational processes in adulthood: The effects of social accountability and information relevance, Psychology and Aging, 16, 629-642.
17. Hummert, M. L., Garstka, T. A., & Ryan, E. B. (2004). The role of age stereotypes in interpersonal communication. In J. F. Nussbaum & J. Coupland (Eds.), Handbook of communication and aging research (2nd ed., pp. 91-114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Levy, B. (1996). Improving memory in old age through implicit self-stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1092-1107.
19. Levy, B. R. (2003). Mind matters: Cognitive and physical effects of aging self-stereotypes. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 58B, 203-211.
20. Mather, M., Johnson, M. K., & De Leonardis, D. (1999). Stereotype reliance in source monitoring: Age differences and neuropsychological test correlates. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 437-458.
21. Nelson, T. D. (2002). Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Rahhal, T. A., Hasher, L., & Colcombe, S. J. (2001). Instructional manipulations and age differences in memory: Now you see them, now you don't. Psychology & Aging, 16, 697-706.
23. Sears, D.O. (1987). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530.
24. Trope, Y., & Gaunt, R. (2000). Processing alternative explanations of behavior: Correction or integration? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7.9, 344-354.
25. vonHippel, W., & Dunlop, S. (inpress). Aging, inhibition, and social inappropriateness. Psychology and Aging.
26. Wang, M., & Chen, Y. (2004). Age differences in the correction processes of context-induced biases: When correction succeeds. Psychology & Aging, 19, 536-540.