A comparison of anesthesiology resident and faculty electronic evaluations before and after implementation of automated electronic reminders

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 264-267

  Blum, James M ^a   Kheterpal, Sachin ^a   Tremper, Kevin K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Anesthesiologists; Anesthesiology residents; Evaluation; Feedback; Participation; Residency education

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; E-MAIL; ELECTRONICS; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KNOWLEDGE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL SCHOOL; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SKILL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ANESTHESIOLOGY; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; ELECTRONIC MAIL; FACULTY, MEDICAL; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; JUDGMENT; MICHIGAN; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 33745194149     PISSN: 09528180     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.10.008     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Program Requirements for Resident Education in Anesthesiology. ACGME Graduate Medical Education Directory: 2003-2004. Section VI. Internal evaluation (2003), American Medical Association Press, Chicago (Ill) 27-41
2. Short J.P. The importance of strong evaluation standards and procedures in training residents. Acad Med 68 (1993) 522-525
3. Rosenblatt M.A., and Schartel S.A. Evaluation, feedback, and remediation in anesthesiology residency training: a survey of 124 United States programs. J Clin Anesth 11 (1999) 519-527