Evaluation, feedback, and remediation in anesthesiology residency training: A survey of 124 United States programs

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 519-527

  Rosenblatt, Meg A ^a   Schartel, Scott A ^b  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Anesthesiology; Clinical competency; Residency training; Resident evaluation; Survey

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIOLOGY; ARTICLE; COMPETENCE; EVALUATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; INFORMATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; TRAINING;

ACCREDITATION; ANESTHESIOLOGY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DATA COLLECTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; EVALUATION STUDIES; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032826419     PISSN: 09528180     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0952-8180(99)00084-7     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Armbruster J: Revisions to program requirements for anesthesiology (memorandum). Chicago, IL: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, June, 1995.
2. Short J.P. The importance of strong evaluation standards and procedures in training residents. Acad Med. 68:1993;522-525.
3. Schueneman A.L., Carley J.P., Baker W.H. Residency evaluations, are they worth the effort? Arch Surg. 129:1994;1067-1072.
4. Harden R.M., Stevenson M., Downie W.W., Wilson G.M. Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination. BMJ. 1:1975;447-451.