Synaptic amplifier of inflammatory pain in the spinal dorsal horn

Science

Volumn 312, Issue 5780, 2006, Pages 1659-1662

  Ikeda, Hiroshi ^a,b   Stark, Johanna ^a   Fischer, Harald ^a   Wagner, Matthias ^a   Drdla, Ruth ^a   Jäger, Tino ^a   Sandkühler, Jürgen ^a  

^a Medical University of Vienna   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FUKUI   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPLIFIERS (ELECTRONIC); BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; FLAMMABILITY; FREQUENCIES; NEUROLOGY; SWITCHES;

HYPERALGESIA; LONG-TERM POTENTIATION (LTP); SIGNAL TRANSACTION PATHWAYS; SPINAL DORSAL HORN;

SENSORY PERCEPTION;

1,1' DIOCTADECYL 3,3,3',3' TETRAMETHYLINDOCARBOCYANINE; CALCIUM ION; GLUTAMIC ACID; N(G) METHYLARGININE; NEUROKININ 1 RECEPTOR; NICKEL; NITRIC OXIDE SYNTHASE; PHOSPHOLIPASE C; PROTEIN KINASE (CALCIUM,CALMODULIN) II; PROTEIN KINASE C; SUBSTANCE P; TETRODOTOXIN;

FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; INJURY; NEUROLOGY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; WOUNDING;

ADOLESCENT; AGED; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CALCIUM CURRENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXCITATORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; HYPERALGESIA; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INFLAMMATION; LASER MICROSCOPY; LONG TERM DEPRESSION; LONG TERM POTENTIATION; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NERVE FIBER; NERVE FIBER C; NERVE STIMULATION; NEUROMODULATION; NOCICEPTION; NONHUMAN; PAIN; PARABRACHIAL NUCLEUS; PERIAQUEDUCTAL GRAY MATTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SENSORY NERVE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPINAL CORD DORSAL HORN; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION;

ANIMALS; CALCIUM; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EXCITATORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIALS; HYPERALGESIA; INFLAMMATION; LONG-TERM POTENTIATION; NERVE FIBERS, UNMYELINATED; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; NITRIC OXIDE; PAIN; PATCH-CLAMP TECHNIQUES; PERIAQUEDUCTAL GRAY; POSTERIOR HORN CELLS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPINAL CORD; SYNAPSES; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION;

EID: 33745143553     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1127233     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. C. J. Woolf, Nature 306, 686 (1983).
2. J. L. K. Hylden, R. L. Nahin, R. J. Traub, R. Dubner, Pain 37, 229 (1989).
3. D. A. Simone et al., J. Neurophysiol. 66, 228 (1991).
4. S. G. Khasabov et al., J. Neurosci. 22, 9086 (2002).
5. A. J. Todd et al., J. Neurosci. 22, 4103 (2002).
6. A. D. Craig, J. Comp. Neurol. 361, 225 (1995).
7. W. D. Willis, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 933, 142 (2001).
8. S. P. Hunt, P. W. Mantyh, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 83 (2001).
9. M. Cavazzini, T. Bliss, N. Emptage, Cell Calcium 38, 355 (2005).
10. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
11. A. J. Todd, M. M. McGill, S. A. S. Shehab, Eur. J. Neurosci. 12, 689 (2000).
12. H. Ikeda, B. Heinke, R. Ruscheweyh, J. Sandkühler, Science 299, 1237 (2003).
13. S. Puig, L. S. Sorkin, Pain 64, 345 (1996).
14. W. D. Willis Jr., R. E. Coggeshall, Sensory Mechanisms of the Spinal Cord. Primary Afferent Neurons and the Spinal Dorsal Horn (Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, ed. 3, 2004), pp. 1-S60.
15. T. L. Yaksh, X. Y. Hua, I. Kalcheva, N. Nozaki-Taguchi, M. Marsala, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 7680 (1999).
16. S. T. Meller, G. F. Gebhart, Pain 52, 127 (1993).
17. R. Ruscheweyh, A. Goralczyk, G. Wunderbaldinger, A. Schober, J. Sandkühler, Neuroscience, in press.
18. I. Ismailov, D. Kalikulov, T. Inoue, M. J. Friedlander, J. Neurosci. 24, 9847 (2004).
19. R. C. Malenka, B. Lancaster, R. S. Zucker, Neuron 9, 121 (1992).
20. S. N. Yang, Y. G. Tang, R. S. Zucker, J. Neurophysiol. 81, 781 (1999).
21. J. Lisman, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 358, 829 (2003).
22. E. R. Perl, in Handbook of Physiology, Section 1, The Nervous System, vol. 3, I. Darian-Smith, Ed. (American Physiological Society, Bethesda, MD, 1984), pp. 915-975.
23. H. E. Torebjörk, L. E. Lundberg, R. H. LaMotte, J. Physiol. 448, 765 (1992).
24. R. C. Spike, Z. Puskár, D. Andrew, A. J. Todd, Eur. J. Neurosci. 18, 2433 (2003).
25. R. Ruscheweyh, H. Ikeda, B. Heinke, J. Sandkühler, J. Physiol. 555, 527 (2004).
26. Because most lamina I spino-PAG neurons have collaterals to the parabrachial area, they constitute a subgroup of about one-third of the spino-PB population. Nevertheless, they have been shown to differ from other spino-PB neurons, e.g., with respect to NK1R expression and active and passive membrane properties. See (24, 25) for further discussion.
27. T. Klein, W. Magert, H. C. Hopf, J. Sandkühler, R.-D. Treede, J. Neurosci. 24, 964 (2004).
28. P. W. Mantyh et al., Science 278, 275 (1997).
29. M. L. Nichols et al., Science 286, 1558 (1999).
30. F. Cervero, R. Gilbert, R. G. Hammond, J. Tanner, Pain 54, 181 (1993).
31. W. Koppert et al., Anesthesiology 95, 395 (2001).
32. Supported by grant P18129 from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) to J.S. The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science partially supported H.I. We thank R.-D. Treede and A. H. Dickenson for reading an earlier version of the manuscript.