Interactive lesion segmentation on dynamic contrast enhanced breast MR using a Markov Model

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 6144 III, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Wu, Qiu ^a   Salganicoff, Marcos ^b   Krishnan, Arun ^b   Fussell, Donald S ^c   Markey, Mia K ^a  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^b SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

^c University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic Contrast Enhanced breast MRI; Kinetic curve; Lesion segmentation; MAP estimate; Markov Random Field; Morphological feature; Region of interest (ROI); Subtraction image

Indexed keywords

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; MARKOV PROCESSES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; MEDICAL IMAGING; TISSUE;

DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED BREAST MRI; KINETIC CURVE; LESION SEGMENTATION; MAP ESTIMATE; MARKOV RANDOM FIELD; MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURE; REGION OF INTEREST (ROI); SUBTRACTION IMAGE;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

EID: 33745117961     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.654308     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. K. Kerlikowske, P. A. Carney, B. Geller, M. T. Mandelson, S. H. Taplin, K. Malvin, V. Ernster, N. Urban, G. Cutter, R. Rosenberg and R. Ballard-Barbash, "Performance of screening mammography among women with and without a first-degree relative with breast cancer", Annals of Internal Medicine, 133, 855-63, 2000.
2. T. M. Kolb, J. Lichy and J. H. Newhouse, "Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.[see comment]", Radiology, 225, 165-75, 2002.
3. R. E. Bird, T. W. Wallace and B. C. Yankaskas, "Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography", Radiology., 184, 613-7, 1992.
4. D. B. Kopans, "The positive predictive value of mammography", AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, 158, 521-6, 1992.
5. Q. Wu and M. K. Markey, "Computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer on MR imaging", Recent Advances in Breast Imaging, Mammography, and Computer-aided Diagnosis of Breast Cancer, J. S. Suri and R. M. Rangayyan, SPIE, 2006.
6. L. Arbach, A. Stolpen and J. M. Reinhardt, "Classification of breast MRI lesions using a backpropagation neural network (BNN)", 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Macro to Nano, 1, 253-6, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Year.
7. P. Hayton, "Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI", Department of Engineering Science, Oxford, D. Phil., 1998.
8. K. G. A. Gihuijs, M. L. Giger and U. Bick, "A method for computerized assessment of tumor extent in contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast", Computer-aided Diagnosis in Medical Imaging, K. Doi, H. MacMahon, M. L. Giger and K. R. Hoffmann, 305-310, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1999.
9. S. Petroudi, G. Ketsetzis and M. Brady, "Multi-vector segmentation of breast MR images via hidden Markov random fields", WSEAS Transactions on Biology and Biomedicine, 1, 344-9, Year.
10. A. Figueiredo and A. K. Jain, "Unsupervisied Learning of Finite Mixture Models", IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24, 381-396, 2002.
11. J. Verbeek, N. Vlassis and B. Krose, "Efficient Greedy Learning of Gaussian Mixture Models", Neural Computation, 2003.
12. C. K. Kuhl, P. Mielcareck, S. Klaschik, C. Leutner, E. Wardelmann, J. Gieseke and H. H. Schild, "Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?" Radiology., 211, 101-10, 1999.
13. S. Li, Markov Random Field Modeling in Computer Vision, Springer-Verlag, 2001.
14. J. K. Fwu and P. M. Djuric, "Unsupervised vector image segmentation by a tree-structure", IEEE transactions on medical Imaging, 15, 871-880, 1996.