Outer-space sensitivities in geoelectrical tomography

Geophysics

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2006, Pages

  Maurer, Hansruedi ^a   Friedel, Sven ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Terrestrial electricity

Indexed keywords

GEOELECTRIC FIELD; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 33745081243     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.2194891     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Barker, R. D., 1997, Electrical imaging and its application in engineering investigations in D. M. McCann, M. Eddleston, P. J. Fenning, and G. M. Reeves, eds., Modern geophysics in engineering geology: Geological Society, 37-43.
2. Friedel, S., 2003, Resolution, stability and efficiency of resistivity tomography estimated from a generalized inverse approach: Geophysical Journal International, 153, 305-316. gji GJINEA 0956-540X 10.1046/ j.1365-246X.2003.01890.x
3. Griffiths, D. H., and J. Turnbull, 1985, A multi-electrode array for resistivity surveying: First Break, 3, no. 7, 16-20.
4. Loke, M. H., and R. D. Barker, 1996, Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method: Geophysical Prospecting, 44, 131-152. 8uc GPPRAR 0016-8025
5. Loke, M. H., 1999, Electrical imaging surveys for environmental and engineering studies: A practical guide to 2-D and 3-D surveys (http://www.abem.se/).
6. Maurer, H., K. Holliger, and D. E. Boerner, 1998, Stochastic regularization: Smoothness or similarity? Geophysical Research Letters, 25, 2889-2892. gpr GPRLAJ 0094-8276 10.1029/98GL02183
7. Menke, W., 1984, Geophysical data analysis: Discrete inverse theory: Academic Press Inc.
8. Rubin, Y., and S. S. Hubbard, 2005, Hydrogeophysics: Springer Verlag.
9. Sasaki, Y., 1992, Resolution of resistivity tomography inferred from numerical simulation: Geophysical Prospecting, 40, 453-464. 8uc GPPRAR 0016-8025
10. Stummer, P., H. Maurer, H. Horstmeyer, and A. G. Green, 2002, Optimization of DC resistivity data acquisition: Real-time experimental design and a new multielectrode system: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40, no. 12, 2727-2736. igr IGRSD2 0196-2892
11. Stummer, P., H. R. Maurer, and A. G. Green, 2004, Experimental design: Electrical resistivity data sets that provide optimum subsurface information: Geophysics, 69, 120-139. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/ 1.1649381
12. White, R. M. S., S. Collins, and M. H. Loke, 2003, Resistivity and IP arrays, optimized for data collection and inversion: Exploration Geophysics, 34, 229-232. 5ht EXGEEF 0812-3985
13. Xu, B., and M. Noel, 1993, On the completeness of data sets with multielectrode systems for electrical resistivity surveys: Geophysical Prospecting, 41, 791-801. 8uc GPPRAR 0016-8025