Auditory steady-state responses and clinical applications

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Volumn 263, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 499-503

  Canale, Andrea ^a   Lacilla, Michelangelo ^a   Cavalot, Andrea Luigi ^a   Albera, Roberto ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Auditory steady state responses; Objective frequency specific audiometry; Sensory neural hearing loss

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDIOGRAPHY; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY RESPONSE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STEADY STATE;

ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, EVOKED RESPONSE; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HEARING TESTS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 33745073267     PISSN: 09374477     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-006-0017-y     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Albera R, Canale G, Magnano M, Lacilla M, Morra, Rugiu MG, Cortesina G (1991) Relationship between pure-tone-audiometry and slow vertex responses. Acta Otorhinol Ital 11:551-562
2. Albera R, Roberto C, Magnano M, Lacilla M, Morra B, Cortesina G (1991) Evaluations on slow vertex response waveform identification. Acta Otorhinol Ital 11:543-549
3. Cohen LT, Rickards FW, Clark GM (1991) A comparison of steady-state potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. J Acoust Soc Am 90:2467-2479
4. Dimitrijevic A, John M, Picton W (2004) Auditory steady-state responses and word recognition scores in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults. Ear Hear 25:68-84
5. Herdman AT, Stapells D (2003) Auditory steady state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments. Int J Audiol 42:237-248
6. Hood LJ (1998) Clinical applications of the ABR in neurological testing. In: Clinical applications of the auditory brainstem response, Singular Publishing Group Inc., San Diego-London, pp 67-91
7. John MS, Brown DK, Muir PJ, Picton TW (2004) Recording auditory steady-state responses in young infants. Ear Hear 25:539-553
8. Lins OG, Picton TW, Boucher BL, Darieux-Smith A, Champagne SC (1996) Frequency-specific audiometry using steady state responses. Ear Hear 17:81-96
9. Luts H, Wouters J (2004) Hearing assessment by recording multiple auditory steady state responses: the influence of test duration. Int J Audiol 43:471-478
10. Perez-Abalo MC, Savio G, Torres A, Martin V, Rodriguez E, Galan L (2001) Steady state responses to multiple amplitude modulated tones: an otimized method to test frequency-specific threshold in hearing-impaired children and normal hearing subjects. Ear Hear 22:200-211
11. Picton TW (1978) The strategy of evoked potentials audiometry. In: Gerber SE, Mencher GT (eds) Early diagnosis of hearing loss. Grune & Strutton, New York, pp 279-308
12. Picton TW, Darieux-Smith A, Champagne SC, Whittingham J, Moran LM (1998) Objective evaluation of aided threshold using auditory steady state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 9:315-331
13. Rance G, Rickards FW, Cohen LT, De Vidi S, Clark GM (1995) Automated prediction of hearing threshold in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear Hear 16:499-507
14. Stapells DR (2002) The tone-evoked ABR: why it's the measure of choise for young infants. Hear J 55:14-18
15. Stapells DR, Picton TW, Perez-Abalo MC, Read D, Smith A (1985) Frequency specificity in evoked potential audiometry. In: Jacobson JT (ed) The auditory brainstem response. College Hill Press, San Diego, pp 147-177