Radial artery access: Should it be used more often?;Acceso por vía radial: ¿Debería ser más utilizado?

Revista Espanola de Cardiologia

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 124-127

  Elízaga Corrales, Jaime ^a  

^a HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO GREGORIO MARAÑÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA; BLEEDING; BRACHIAL ARTERY; CORONARY HEMODYNAMICS; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EDITORIAL; EXPERIENCE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEMATOMA; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NEUROPATHY; PATIENT CARE; RADIAL ARTERY; VASCULAR ACCESS;

EID: 0037293462     PISSN: 03008932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1157/13043217     Document Type: Editorial

References (11)

1. Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989;16:3-7.
2. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, De Melker E. Transradial artery coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 1995;129:1-7.
3. Louvard Y, Lefevre T, Allain A, Morice M. Coronary angiography through the radial or the femoral approach: The CARAFE study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;52:181-7.
4. Cooper CJ, El-Shiekh RA, Cohen DJ, Blaesing L, Burket MW, Basu A, et al. Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: A randomized comparison. Am Heart J 1999;138:430-6.
5. Mann T, Cubeddu G, Bowen J, Schneider JE, Arrowood M, Newman WN, et al. Stenting in acute coronary syndromes: a comparison of radial versus femoral access sites. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:572-6.
6. Salgado J, Calviño R, Vázquez Rodríguez JM, Vázquez González N, Vázquez Rey E, Pérez Fernández R, et al. Coronariografía y angioplastia coronaria por vía radial: experiencia inicial y curva de aprendizaje. Rev Esp Cardiol 2003;56:152-9.
7. Sanmartín M, Goicolea J, Meneses D, Ruiz-Salmerón R, Mantilla R, Claro R, et al. Angiografía coronaria con catéteres 4F por la vía radial: el «cateterismo mínimamente invasivo». Rev Esp Cardiol 2003;56:145-51.
8. Todd DM, Hubner PJ, Hudson N, Sarma J, McCance AJ, Caplin J. Multicentre, prospective, randomized trial of 4 vs. 6 French catheters in 410 patients undergoing coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;54:269-75.
9. Brinker JA. Radial is not radical, but is it practical? Confession of a nonuser. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;51:291-2.
10. Louvard Y, Lefevre T, Morice MC. Radial approach: what about the learning curve? Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997;42:467-8.
11. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, Van der Wieken R. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal. coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1269-75.