Benefits of the combined use of stochastic multi-criteria evaluation with principal components analysis

Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 319-334

  Marinoni, Oswald ^a  

^a DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Decision support; Land use; Multi criteria analysis; Principal components analysis; Stochastic simulation

Indexed keywords

MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL METHOD; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; STOCHASTICITY;

EID: 33745068018     PISSN: 14363240     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-005-0024-3     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Blanco Morón A, Calvo-Flores M, Martin RJ, Polo AM (2001) Fuzzy methods of multicriteria decision. The methods FPROMETHEE I and II. In: Proceedings of the world multiconference on systemics, cybernetics and informatics (SCI-2001), Orlando, Florida, pp 93-98
2. Bowden AR, Lane MR, Martin JH (2001) Triple bottom line risk management - enhancing profit, environmental performance and community benefits. Wiley, New York
3. Brans JP, Mareschal B (1992) PROMETHEE V: MCDM problems with segmentation constraints. INFOR 30:85-96
4. Brans JP, Mareschal B, Vincke P (1984) PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis. Operational Research 477-490
5. Chu TC (2002) Selecting plant location via a fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 20:859-864
6. Drechsler M (1999) Verfahren zur multikriteriellen Entscheidungsanalyse bei Unsicherheit. Ufz-Bericht 16:187-214
7. Esri Inc. (2004) ArcGIS 9. ESRI Inc, Redlands, California
8. Geldermann J, Rentz O (2001) Integrated technique assessment with imprecise information as a support for the identification of the best available techniques (BAT). OR Spectrum 23:137-157
9. Guitouni A, Martel JM (1998) Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. Eur J Oper Res 109:501-521
10. Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making - methods and applications. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
11. Joerin F, Thériault M, Musy A (2001) Using GIS and outranking multicriteria analysis for land-use suitability assessment. Int J Geogr Inform Sci 15:153-174
12. Mareschal B, Brans JP (1988) Geometrical representations for MCDM (GAIA). Eur J Oper Res 34:69-77
13. Marinoni O (2005) A stochastic spatial decision support system based on PROMETHEE. Int J Geogr Inform Sci 19:51-68
14. Marinoni O (2006) A discussion on the computational limitations of outranking methods for land use suitability assessment. Int J Geogr Inform Sci (in press)
15. Palisade Corporation (2002) Risk 4.5.2. advanced risk analysis for spreadsheets. Newfield, New York
16. Pereira JMC, Duckstein L (1993) A multiple criteria decision-making approach to GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Int J Geogr Inform Syst 7:407-424
17. Roy B (1985) Méthodologie multicritàre d'aide à la décision. Economica, Paris
18. Simon TW (1999) Two-dimensional Monte Carlo Simulation and beyond: A comparison of several probabilistic risk assessment methods applied to a superfund site. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 5:823-843
19. StatSoft Inc. (2001) STATISTICA for Windows, Tulsa, OK 74104. http://www.statsoft.com.