A stochastic spatial decision support system based on PROMETHEE

International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 51-68

  Marinoni, Oswald ^a  

^a DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Decision support system; GIS; Land use; Monte Carlo simulation; Multicriteria analysis; PROMETHEE; Stochastic simulation

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; GIS; LAND USE; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; STOCHASTICITY;

EID: 12444312992     PISSN: 13658816     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13658810412331280176     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. As/Nzs 4360:1999, 1999, Risk management. Standards Association of Australia. 12.04.1999, Strathfield NSW.
2. Bowden, A.R., Lane, M.R. and Martin, J.H., 2001, Triple Bottom Line Risk Management - Enhancing Profit, Environmental Performance and Community Benefits (New York: John Wiley & Sons).
3. Brans, J.P., Mareschal, B. and Vincke, Ph., 1984, PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis. Operational Research, pp. 477-490.
4. Brans, J.P. and Mareschal, B., 1992, PROMETHEE V : MCDM problems with additional segmentation constraints, INFOR, 30, pp. 85-96.
5. Can/Csa-Q850-97, 1997, Risk management: Guideline for decision makers. - A national standard of Canada. Canadian Standards Association. Etobicoke, Ontario.
6. Carver, S., 1991, Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5, pp. 321-339.
7. Dai, F.C., Lee, C.F. and Zhang, X.H., 2001, GIS-based geo-environmental evaluation for urban land-use planning: a case study. Engineering Geology, 61, pp. 257-271.
8. Esri Inc., 2002, ArcGIS 8.2. ESRI Inc., Redlands, California.
9. Feick, R.D. and Hall, G.B., 1999, Consensus-building in a Multi-Participant Spatial Decision Support System. URISA Journal, 11, pp. 17-23.
10. Geldermann, J. and Rentz, O., 2001, Integrated technique assessment with imprecise information as a support for the identification of the best available techniques (BAT). OR Spektrum, 23, pp. 137-157.
11. Guitouni, A. and Martel, J.-M., 1998, Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. European Journal Of Operational Research, 109, pp. 501-521.
12. Joerin, F., Thériault, M. and Musy, A., 2001, Using GIS and outranking multicriteria analysis for land-use suitability assessment. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15 pp. 153-174.
13. Malczewski, J., 1999, Spatial multicriteria decision analysis. In Spatial Multicriteria Decision Making And Analysis - A geographic information sciences approach, J.C. Thill (Ed), (New York, N.Y: Ashgate), pp. 11-48.
14. Mareschal, B., 1993, PROMETHEE VI: using interval weighting to assess hard and soft MCDM problems. 37th Meeting of the European Working Group on Multicriteria Decision Aid, Liège, Belgium, 11-12/03/1993.
15. Martin, N., St-Onge, B. and Waaub, J.-P., 1999, Geographic tools for decision making in watershed management. In Spatial Multicriteria Decision Making And Analysis - A geographic information sciences approach, J.C. Thill (Ed), (New York, N.Y: Ashgate), pp. 309-334.
16. Palisade Corporations, 2002, Risk 4.5.2. Advanced risk analysis for spreadsheets (New York: Newfield).
17. Pereira, A.G., 2001, Evolutionary modelling of routes. In Spatial evolutionary modeling, R. Krzanowski and J. Raper (Eds), (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 180-202.
18. Pereira, J.M.C. and Duckstein, L., 1993, A multiple criteria decision-making approach to GIS-based land suitability evaluation. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 7, pp. 407-424.
19. Roy, B., 1985, Méthodologie multicritère d'aide à la décision, Economica, Paris.
20. Simon, T.W., 1999, Two-dimensional Monte Carlo Simulation and beyond: A comparison of several probabilistic risk assessment methods applied to a superfund site. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 5, pp. 823-843.
21. Saaty, T.L., 1977, A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, pp. 231-281.
22. Tkach, R.J. and Simonovic, S.P., 1997, A New Approach to Multi-criteria Decision Making in Water Resources. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, 1, pp. 25-44.
23. USEPA, 1997, Guiding Principles for Monte Carlo Analysis, EPA/630/R-97/001 (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), Washington D.C.
24. Vincke, P., 1986, Analysis of multicriteria decision aid in Europe. European Journal of Operational Research, 25, pp. 160-168.