Consumer willingness to pay for environmentally friendly produced vegetables in Thailand

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 655, Issue , 2004, Pages 107-113

  Vanit Anunchai, C ^a   Schmidt, E ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Censored data; Contingent valuation; Double bounded; Lognormal distribution; Pesticide free vegetable

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745066161     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.655.13     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Belzer, R.B. and Theroux, R.P. 1997. Criteria for evaluating results obtained from contingent valuation methods. Food Marketing Policy Center, University of Connecticut.
2. Boccaletti, S. and Nardella, M. 2000. Consumer willingness to pay for pesticide-free fresh fruit and vegetables in Italy. Intl. Food Agr. Mgt. Rev. 3:297-310.
3. Boyle, K.J., Johnson, F.R., McCollum, D.W., Desvouges, W.H., Dunford, R.W., and Hudson, S.P. 1996. Valuing public goods: discrete versus continuous contingent-valuation responses. Land Econ. 72:381-396.
4. Buzby, J.C., Skees J.R. and Ready, R.C. 1997. Using contingent valuation to value food safety: a case study of grapefruit and pesticide residues. Food Marketing Policy Center, University of Connecticut.
5. Calia, Pinuccia and E. Strazzera. 1999. Bias and Efficiency of Single vs Double Bound Models for Contingent Valuation Studies: a Monte Carlo Analysis. Working Paper No.1999.10, University of Cagliari.
6. Cameron, T.A. 1988. A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regression. J. Env. Econ. Mgt. 15:355-379.
7. Fu, T., Liu, J. and Hammitt, J.K. 1999. Consumer willingness to pay for low-pesticide fresh produce in Taiwan. J. Agr. Econ. 50:220-233.
8. th Edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc.
9. Halbrendt, C., Sterling, L., Snider, S. and Santoro, G. 1997. Contingent valuation of consumers' willingness to purchase pork with lower saturated fat. Food Marketing Policy Center, University of Connecticut.
10. Hanemann, M.W. and Kanninen, B.J. 1996. The Statistical Analysis of Discrete-response CV Data. Working Paper No. 798, Department of Agriculture and Resource Economics, University of California at Berkeley.
11. Hanemann, M.W., Loomis, J. and Kanninen, B.J. 1991. Statistical efficiency of double bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 6:332-341.
12. Kanninen, B.J. 1993. Optimal experimental design for double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Land Econ. 69:138-146.
13. Nayga, R.M., Poghosyan, A. and Nichols, J.P. 2004. Will consumers accept irradiated food products? Intl. J. Consumer Studies, 28:178-185.
14. Scarpa, R. and Bateman, I. 2000. Efficiency gains afforded by improved bid design versus follow-up valuation questions in Discrete-choice CV studies. Land Econ. 76:299-311.