The role of affective orientation in the five factor personality structure

Communication Research Reports

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 301-313

  Booth Butterfield, Melanie ^a   Booth Butterfield, Steve ^b  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745055133     PISSN: 08824096     EISSN: 17464099     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08824090209384859     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bagby, M., and Taylor, G., 2000. “ Measurement and validation of the alexithymia construct ”. In Disorders of affect regulation: Alexithymia in medical and psychiatric illness, Edited by: Taylor, G.J., Bagby, R.M., and Parker, J.D.A., 56–76. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Berry, D., and Hansen, J., 2000. Personality, nonverbal behavior, and interaction quality in female dyads. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26: 278–292.
3. Block, J., 1995. A contrarian view of the Five‐Factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117: 187–215.
4. Booth‐Butterfield, M., and Booth‐Butterfield, S., 1990. Conceptualizing affect as information in communication production. Human Communication Research, 16: 451–476.
5. Booth‐Butterfield, M., and Booth‐Butterfield, S., 1994. The affective orientation to communication: Conceptual and empirical distinctions. Communication Quarterly, 42: 331–344.
6. Booth‐Butterfield, M., and Booth‐Butterfield, S., 1996. Using your emotions: Improving the measurement of affective orientation. Communication Research Reports, 13: 157–163.
7. Booth‐Butterfield, M., and Booth‐Butterfield, S., 1997. “ Emotionality and affective orientation ”. In Communication and Personality: Trait Perspectives, Edited by: McCroskey, J. C., Daly, J., and Martin, Matthew. 171–189. New York: Hampton Press.
8. Booth‐Butterfield, M., and Sidelinger, R., 1997. Affective orientation and open family communication. Communication Research Reports, 14: 408–415.
9. Budaev, S., 1999. Sex differences in the Big Five personality factors: Testing an evolutionary hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 26: 801–813.
10. Burgoon, J., and Dunbar, N., 2000. An Interactionist perspective on dominance‐submission: Interpersonal dominance as a dynamic, situationally contingent social skill. Communication Monographs, 67: 96–121.
11. Buss, D., and Shakelford, T., 1997. Susceptibility to infidelity in the first year of marriage. Journal of Research in Personality, 31: 193–221.
12. Christensen, A., and Smith, T., 1995. Personality and patient adherence: Correlates of the five‐factor model in renal analysis. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 18: 305–313.
13. Cohen, J., 1977. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd Ed., New York: Academic Press.
14. Costa, P., and McCrae, R., 1992. Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO‐PI‐R) and the NEO Five‐factor Inventory (NEO‐FFI) professional manual, Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
15. Costa, P., and McCrae, R., 1995. Solid ground in the wetlands of personality: A reply to Block. Psychological Bulletin, 117: 216–220.
16. Costa, P., and McCrae, R., 1998. Six approaches to the explication of facet‐level traits: Examples from conscientiousness. European Journal of Personality, 12: 117–134.
17. Costa, P., Terracciano, A., and McCrae, R., 2001. Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81: 322–331.
18. Cote, S., and Moskowitz, D., 1998. On the dynamic covariation between interpersonal behavior and affect: Prediction from neuroticism, extraversion, and agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75: 1032–1046.
19. Davies, M., Stankov, L., and Roberts, R., 1998. Emotional intelligence: In search of an elusive construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75: 989–1015.
20. Digman, J., 1990. Personality structure: Emergence of the five‐factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41: 417–440.
21. Dillard, J., Plotnick, C., Godbold, L., Friemuth, V., and Edgar, T., 1996. The multiple affective outcomes of AIDS PSAs: Fear appeals do more than scare people. Communication Research, 23: 44–72.
22. Dolin, D., and Booth‐Butterfield, M., 1993. Reach out and touch someone: Analysis of nonverbal comforting responses. Communication Quarterly, 41: 383–393.
23. Ellington, L., and Wiebe, D., 1999. Neuroticism, symptom presentation, and medical decision making. Health Psychology, 18: 634–643.
24. Feingold, A., 1994. Gender differences in personality: A meta‐analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116: 429–456.
25. Francis, L., 1999. Happiness is a thing called stable extraversion: A further examination of the relationship between the Oxford Happiness Inventory and Eysenck's dimensional model of personality and gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 26: 5–11.
26. Friedman, H., Tucker, J., Schwartz, J., Martin, L., Tomlinson‐Keasey, C., Wingard, D., and Criqui, M., 1995. Childhood conscientiousness and longevity: Health behaviors and cause of death. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68: 696–703.
27. Frijda, N., Ortony, A., Sonnemans, J., and Clore, G., 1992. “ The complexity of intensity: Issues concerning the structure of emotion intensity ”. In Review of personality and social psychology, Edited by: Clark, M. S., Vol. 13, 60–89. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
28. Gilbert, D., and Gilbert, B., 1995. Personality, psychopathology, and nicotine response as mediators of the genetics of smoking. Genetic, environmental, and situational factors mediating the effects of nicotine. Behavior Genetics, 25: 133–147.
29. Goldberg, L., Sweeney, D., Merenda, P., and Hughes, J., 1998. Demographic variables and personality: The effects of gender, age, education, and ethnic/racial status on self‐descriptions of personality attributes. Personality and Individual Differences, 24: 393–403.
30. Hall, J., 1998. “ How big are nonverbal sex differences? The case of smiling and sensitivity to nonverbal cues ”. In Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interaction, Edited by: Canary, D., and Dindia, K., 155–178. Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Hofstee, W., Raad, B., and Goldberg, L., 1992. Integration of the Big 5 and circumplex structures to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63: 146–164.
32. Isen, A., 1987. “ Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior ”. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Edited by: Berkowitz, L., Vol. 20, 203–253. New York: Academic Press.
33. Jang, K., McCrae, R., Angleitner, A., Riemann, R., and Livelsey, W., 1998. Heritability of facte‐level traits in a cross‐cultural twin sample: Support for a hierarchical model of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 1556–1565.
34. Kardum, I., 1999. Affect intensity and frequency: Their relation to mean level and variability of positive and negative affect and Eysenck's personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 26: 33–48.
35. Koole, S., Jager, W., van den Berg, A., Vlek, C., and Hofstee, W., 2001. On the social nature of personality: Effects of Extraversion, Agreeableness, and feedback about collective resource use on cooperation in a resource dilemma. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27: 289–301.
36. Kring, A., and Gordon, A., 1998. Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 686–703.
37. Lemos‐Giraldez, S., and Fidalgo‐Aliste, A., 1997. Personality dispositions and health‐related habits and attitudes: A cross‐sectional study. European Journal of Personality, 11: 197–209.
38. Matthews, G., and Gilliland, K., 1999. The personality theories of H.J. Eysenck and J.A. Gray: A comparative review. Personality and Individual Differences, 26: 583–626.
39. McCroskey, J., Daly, J., and Martin, M., 1997. Communication and ‐personality: Trait perspectives, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
40. Mount, M., Barrick, M., and Stewart, G., 1998. Five‐Factor Model of personality and performance in jobs involving interpersonal interactions. Human Performance, 11: 145–165.
41. Neuman, G., Wagner, S., and Christiansen, N., 1999. The relationship between work‐team personality composition and the job performance of teams. Group and Organizational Management, 24: 28–45.
42. Rusting, C., 1998. Personality, mood, and cognitive processing of emotional information: Three conceptual frameworks. Psychological Bulletin, 124: 165–196.
43. Rusting, C., and Larsen, R., 1998. Personality and cognitive processing of affective information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24: 200–213.
44. Rusting, C., and Nolen‐Hoeksma, S., 1998. Regulating responses to anger: Effects of rumination and distraction on angry mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 790–803.
45. Sadowski, C., and Cogburn, H., 1997. Need for Cognition in the Big‐Five factor structure. Journal of Psychology, 131: 307–312.
46. Stephenson, M., and Palmgreen, P., 2001. Sensation seeking, perceived message sensation value, personal involvement, and processing of anti‐marijuana PSAs. Communication Monographs, 68: 49–71.
47. Watson, D., and Clark, L., 1992. On traits and temperament: General and specific factors of emotional experience and their relation to the five‐factor model. Journal of Personality, 60: 441–176.
48. Yelsma, P., 1995. Couples’ affective orientations and their verbal abusiveness. Communication Quarterly, 43: 100–114.
49. Zuckerman, M., 1994. Behavioral expressions and biosotial bases of sensation‐seeking, NY: Cambridge University Press.
50. Zuckerman, M., Joireman, J., Kraft, M., and Kuhlman, D., 1999. Where do motivational and emotional traits fit within three factor models of personality?. Personality and Individual Differences, 26: 487–504.
51. Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D., Joireman, J., Teta, P., and Kraft, M., 1993. A comparison of three structural models for personality: The big‐three, the big‐five, and the alternative five. Journal, of Personality and Social Psychology, 65: 757–768.