Can prey behaviour induce spatially synchronic aggregation of solitary predators?

Oikos

Volumn 113, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 497-505

  Penteriani, Vincenzo ^a   A Fortuna, Miguel ^a   J Melián, Carlos ^b   Otalora, Fermín ^c   Ferrer, Miguel ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

^b NATIONAL CENTER FOR ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIRD; DISPERSAL; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; JUVENILE; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

EURASIA; EUROPE; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN;

ACCIPITRIDAE; AQUILA ADALBERTI; AQUILA HELIACA ADALBERTI;

EID: 33745053335     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14547.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Abrams P.. 1995. Implications of dynamically variable traits for identifying, classifying and measuring direct and indirect effects in ecological communities Am. Nat. 146: 112 134.
2. Abramsky Z. Strauss A. Subach A. et al. 1996. The effect of barn owls (Tyto alba) on the activity and microhabitat selection of Gerbillus allenbyi and G. pyramidum Oecologia 105: 313 319.
3. Ainley D. G. Ford R. G. Brown E. D. et al. 2003. Prey resources, competition, and geographic structure of kittiwake colonies in Prince William Sound Ecology 84: 709 723.
4. Bahr D. B. Bekoff M.. 1999. Predicting flock vigilance from simple passerine interactions: modelling with cellular automata Anim. Behav. 58: 831 839.
5. Bak P. Paczuski M.. 1995. Complexity, contingency, and criticality Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92: 6689 6696.
6. Bart J.. 1995. Acceptance criteria for using individual-based models to make management decisions Ecol. Appl. 5: 411 420.
7. Beauchamp G.. 1998. The effect of group size on mean food intake rate in birds Biol. Rev. 73: 449 472.
8. Beauchamp G. Bélisle M. Giraldeau L.-A.. 1997. Influence of conspecific attraction on the spatial distribution of learning foragers in a patchy habitat J. Anim. Ecol. 66: 671 682.
9. Bélisle M.. 1998. Foraging group size: models and a test with jaegers kleptoparasitizing terns Ecology 79: 1922 1938.
10. Bonabeau E. Dessalles J. L. Grumbach A.. 1995. Characterizing emergent phenomena (1): a critical review Rev. Int. Syst. 9: 227 246.
11. Bonabeau E. Dagorn L. Fréon P.. 1999. Scaling in animal group-size distributions Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96: 4472 4477.
12. Brown J. S. Kotler B. P.. 2004. Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation Ecol. Lett. 7: 999 1014.
13. Brown J. S. Kotler B. P. Bouskila A.. 2001. Ecology of fear: foraging games between predators and prey with pulsed resources Ann. Zool. Fenn. 38: 71 87.
14. Camazine S. Sneyd J. Jenkins M. J. et al. 1990. A mathematical model of self-organized pattern formation on the combs of honeybee colonies J. Theor. Biol. 147: 553 571.
15. Camazine S. Deneubourg J. L. Franks N. R. et al. 2001. Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton Univ. Press.
16. Coolen I.. 2002. Increasing foraging group size increases scrounger use and reduces searching efficiency in nutmeg manikins (Lonchura punctulata) Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 52: 232 238.
17. Cressman R. Krivan V. Garay J.. 2004. Ideal free distributions, evolutionary games, and population dynamics in multiple-species environments Am. Nat. 164: 473 489.
18. Deneubourg J. L. Goss S.. 1989. Collective patterns and decision-making Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 1: 295 311.
19. Deneubourg J. L. Aron S. Goss S. et al. 1986. Random behaviour, amplification processes and number of participants: how they contribute to the foraging properties of ants Physica 221: 176 186.
20. de Roos A. M. McCauley E. Wilson W. G.. 1998. Pattern formation and the spatial scale of interactions between predators and their prey Theor. Popul. Biol. 53: 108 130.
21. Dubois F. Giraldeau L. A.. 2003. The forager's dilemma: food sharing and food defense as risk-sensitive foraging options Am. Nat. 162: 768 779.
22. Ferrer M.. 1993a. Reduction in hunting success and settlement strategies in young Spanish imperial eagles Anim. Behav. 45: 406 408.
23. Ferrer M.. 1993b. Juvenile dispersal behaviour and natal philopatry of a long-lived raptor, the Spanish imperial eagle Aquila adalberti Ibis 135: 132 138.
24. Ferrer M.. 2001. The Spanish imperial eagle. Lynx Editions.
25. Ferrer M. Penteriani V.. 2003. A process of pair formation leading to assortative mating: passive age-assortative mating by habitat heterogeneity Anim. Behav. 66: 137 143.
26. Galef B. G. Giraldeau L. A.. 2001. Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: causal mechanisms and adaptive functions Anim. Behav. 61: 3 15.
27. Giraldeau L. A. Beauchamp G.. 1999. Food exploitation: searching for the optimal joining policy Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 102 106.
28. Giraldeau L. A. Caraco T.. 2000. Social foraging theory. Princeton Univ. Press.
29. Gurney W. S. C. Veitch A. R.. 2000. Self-organization, scale and stability in a spatial predator-prey interaction B. Math. Biol. 62: 61 86.
30. Gurney W. S. C. Veitch A. R. Cruickshank I. et al. 1998. Circles and spirals: population persistence in a spatially explicit predator-prey model Ecology 79: 2516 2530.
31. Hassel M. P. Comins H. N. May R. M.. 1991. Spatial structure and chaos in insect population-dynamics Nature 353: 255 258.
32. Jansen V. A. A.. 1995. Regulation of predator-prey systems through spatial interactions: a possible solution to the paradox of enrichment Oikos 74: 384 390.
33. Kareiva P.. 1989. Renewing the dialogue between theory and experiments Roughgarden J. Mat R. M. Levin S. A. Perspectives in ecological theory. Princeton Univ. Press 68 88.
34. Kelso J. A. S. Mandell A. J. Shlesinger M. F.. 1988. Dynamic patterns in complex systems. World Scientific Publishing.
35. Lagos V. O. Contreras L. C. Meserve P. L. et al. 1995. Predation effects on space use by small mammals: a field experiment with a Neotropical rodent, Octodon degus Oikos 74: 259 264.
36. Lett C. Auger P. Gaillard J. M.. 2003. Continuous cycling of grouped vs. solitary strategy frequencies in a predator-prey model Theor. Popul. Biol. 65: 263 270.
37. Lima S. L.. 2002. Putting predators back into behavioural predator-prey interactions Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 70 75.
38. Loggerwell E. A. Hargreaves N. B.. 1996. The distribution of seabirds relative to their fish prey off Vancouver Island: opposing results at large and small spatial scales Fish. Ocean. 5: 163 175.
39. Neill S. R. St. J. Cullen J. M.. 1974. Experiments on whether schooling by their prey affects hunting behaviour of cephalopod and fish predators J. Zool. (Lond.) 172: 549 569.
40. Nelson E. H. Matthews C. E. Rosenheim J. A.. 2004. Predators reduce prey population growth by inducing changes in prey behavior Ecology 85: 1853 1858.
41. Nicolis G. Prigogine I.. 1977. Self-organization in nonequilibrium systems. John Wiley & Sons.
42. Parrish J. K.. 1992. Do predators 'shape' fish schools: interactions between predators and their schooling prey Neth. J. Zool. 42: 358 370.
43. Parrish J. K. Hamner W. M.. 1997. Animal groups in three dimensions. Cambridge Univ. Press.
44. Parrish J. K. Edelstein-Keshet L.. 1999. Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary tradeoffs in animal aggregation Science 284: 99 101.
45. Penteriani V. Otalora F. Ferrer M.. 2005a. Floater survival affects population persistence. The role of prey availability and environmental stochasticity Oikos 108: 523 534.
46. Penteriani V. Otalora F. Sergio F. et al. 2005b. Environmental stochasticity in dispersal areas can explain the "mysterious" disappearance of breeding populations Proc. R. Soc. 272: 1265 1269.
47. Perry D. A.. 1995. Self-organizing systems across scales Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 241 244.
48. Perry G. Pianka E. R.. 1997. Animal foraging: past, present and future Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 360 364.
49. Petrovskii S. V. Malchow H.. 1999. A minimal model of pattern formation in a prey-predator system Math. Comput. Model. 29: 49 63.
50. Portha S. Deneubourg J. L. Detrain C.. 2002. Self-organized asymmetries in ant foraging: a functional response to food type and colony needs Behav. Ecol. 13: 776 781.
51. Reed J. M. Dobson A. P.. 1993. Behavioural constraints and conservation biology: conspecific attraction and recruitment Trends Ecol Evol. 8: 253 256.
52. Rita H. Ranta E.. 1999. An individual's gain in a foraging group Ann. Zool. Fenn. 36: 129 138.
53. Rivault C. Theraulaz G. Cloarec A. et al. 1999. Auto-organisation et reconnaissance coloniale: le modèle de l'agrégation de la blatte Actes Coll. Insectes Soc. 12: 11 18.
54. Rosenzweig M. L. Abramsky Z. Subach A.. 1997. Safety in numbers: sophisticated vigilance by Allenby's gerbil Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94: 5713 5715.
55. Sakaguchi H.. 2003. Self-organization of hierarchical structures in non-locally coupled replicator models Phys. Lett. A 313: 188 191.
56. Seeley T. D.. 1987. Foraging by honeybee colonies: a case study of decentralized control in insect societies Eder J. Rembold H. Chemistry and biology of social insects. Verlag J. Peperny 489 491.
57. Sergio F. Penteriani V.. 2005. Public information and territory establishment in a loosely colonial raptor Ecology 86: 340 346.
58. Sokal R. R. Rohlf F. J.. 1981. Biometry. W. H. Freeman.
59. Stamps J. A.. 1988. Conspecific attraction and aggregation in territorial species Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28: 29 36.
60. Valone T. J.. 1989. Group foraging, public information, and patch estimation Oikos 56: 357 363.
61. van de Koppel J. Rietkerk M. Dankers N. et al. 2005. Scale-dependent feedback and regular spatial patterns in young mussel beds Am. Nat. 165: E-Article.
62. Yunger J. A.. 2004. Movement and spatial organization of small mammals following vertebrate predator exclusion Oecologia 139: 647 654.