Biased tomography schemes: An objective approach

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 96, Issue 23, 2006, Pages

  Hradil, Z ^a   Mogilevtsev, D ^b,c   Cehacek J ^a  

^a PALACKÝ UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b B I STEPANOV INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS   (Belarus)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF ALAGOAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DETECTORS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; QUANTUM EFFICIENCY; TRANSFER FUNCTIONS;

AD HOC TRUNCATIONS; BINARY DETECTORS; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD QUANTUM-STATE ESTIMATION; OPTICAL SIGNAL;

SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY;

EID: 33745031307     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.230401     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. K. Vogel and H. Risken, Phys. Rev. A 40, 2847 (1989). PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.2847
2. M. Raymer and M. Beck, in Quantum States Estimation, edited by, M.G.A. Paris, and, J. Rehacek, Lect. Not. Phys. Vol. 649 (Springer, Heidelberg, 2004).
3. Quantum States Estimation, edited by, M.G.A. Paris, and, J. Čeháček, Lect. Not. Phys. Vol. 649 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2004).
4. D. Mogilevtsev, Z. Hradil, and J. Perina, Quantum Semiclass. Opt. QUSOEC 1355-5111 10, 345 (1998). 10.1088/1355-5111/10/2/008
5. A.I. Lvovsky, J. Opt. B JOBOFD 1464-4266 6, S556 (2004). 10.1088/1464-4266/6/6/014
6. This form, suggested by Fermi, is sometimes called "extended maximum likelihood;" see R. Barlow, Statistics (Wiley, New York, 1989), p.90
7. It corresponds to the Poissonian model with unknown mean numbers.
8. A.P. Dempster, N.M. Laird, and D.B. Rubin, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. JSTBAJ 0035-9246 39, 1 (1977);
9. Y. Vardi and D. Lee, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. JSTBAJ 0035-9246 55, 569 (1993).
10. D. Mogilevtsev, Opt. Commun. OPCOB8 0030-4018 156, 307 (1998); 10.1016/S0030-4018(98)00435-0
11. D. Mogilevtsev, Acta Phys. Slovaca 49, 743 (1999). APSVCO 0323-0465
12. G. Zambra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 063602 (2005). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.063602
13. J. Čeháček, Z. Hradil, O. Haderka, J. Perina, Jr., and M. Hamar, Phys. Rev. A 67, 061801(R) (2003). PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.061801
14. S. Wallentowitz and W. Vogel, Phys. Rev. A 53, 4528 (1996). PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.53.4528
15. K. Banaszek and K. Wódkiewicz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4344 (1996). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4344
16. K. Banaszek, C. Radzewicz, K. Wódkiewicz, and J.S. Krasiński, Phys. Rev. A 60, 674 (1999). PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.674
17. L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1995).
18. H. Cramer, Mathematical Methods of Statistics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1946).
19. A. Royer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2745 (1985); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2745
20. H. Moya-Cessa and P.L. Knight, Phys. Rev. A 48, 2479 (1993). PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.48.2479
21. K. Banaszek, Phys. Rev. A 59, 4797 (1999). PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.4797
22. K.E. Cahill and R.J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. 177, 1857 (1969); PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.177.1857
23. K.E. Cahill R.J. Glauber Phys. Rev. 177, 1882 (1969). PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.177.1882