Combined effect of hydrodynamic and interfacial flow parameters on lysozyme deactivation in a stirred tank bioreactor

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 660-672

  Ghadge, Rajaram S ^a   Patwardhan, Ashwin W ^a   Joshi, Jyeshtharaj B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; ENERGY DISSIPATION; ENZYMES; HYDRODYNAMICS; PURIFICATION;

ENZYME DEACTIVATION; FLOW PARAMETERS; HYDRODYNAMIC FLOW; LYSOZYME;

BIOREACTORS;

LYSOZYME;

ARTICLE; BIOREACTOR; CHEMISTRY; ENZYME ACTIVATION; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FLOW KINETICS; INSTRUMENTATION; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

BIOREACTORS; ENZYME ACTIVATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; MURAMIDASE; RHEOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 33745014777     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/bp050269s     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Elias, C. B.; Joshi, J. B. Role of hydrodynamic shear on activity and structure of proteins. Adv. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1997, 59, 47-71.
2. Caussette, M.; Gaunand, A.; Planche, H.; Sophie, C.; Monsan, P.; Lindet, B. Lysozyme inactivation by inert gas bubbling: Kinetics in a bubble column reactor. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1999, 24, 412-418.
3. Colombia, S.; Gaunand, A.; Rinaudo, M.; Lindet, B. Irreversible lysozyme inactivation and aggregation induced by stirring: Kinetic study and aggregates characterization. Biotechnol. Lett. 2000, 22, 277-283.
4. Reese, E. T.; Robbins, F. M. Denaturation of β-lactoglobulin by shaking and its subsequent reactivation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1981, 83, 393-400.
5. Shiragami, N.; Unno, H. Effect of shear stress on activity of cellular enzyme in animal cell. Bioprocess Eng. 1994, 10, 43-45.
6. Reese, E. T.; Ryu, D. Y. Shear inactivation of cellulase of Trichoderma reesei. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1980, 2, 239-240.
7. Thomas, C. R.; Nienow, A. W.; Dunnill, P. Action of shear on enzymes: Studies with alcohol dehydrogenase. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1979, 21, 2263-2278.
8. Thomas, C. R.; Dunnill, P. Action of shear on enzymes: Studies with catalase and ureases. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1979, 21, 2279-2302.
9. Maa, Y. F.; Hsu, C. C. Effect of high shear on proteins. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1997, 51, 458-465.
10. Virkar, P. D.; Narendranathan, T. J.; Hoare, M.; Dunnill, P. Studies of the effects of shear on globular proteins: Extension to higher shear fields and to pumps. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1981, 23, 425-429.
11. Lencki, R. W.; Tecante, A.; Choplin, L. Effect of shear on the inactivation kinetics of the enzyme dextransucrase. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1993, 42, 1061-1067.
12. Narendranathan, T. J.; Dunnill, P. The effect of shear on globular proteins during ultrafiltration: Studies of alcohol dehydrogenase. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1982, 24, 2101-2107.
13. Mohanty, M.; Ghadge, R. S.; Patil, N. S.; Sawant, S. B.; Joshi, J. B.; Deshpande, A. V. Deactivation of lipase at gas-liquid interface in stirred vessel. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2001, 56, 3401-3408.
14. Ghadge, R. S.; Sawant, S. B.; Joshi, J. B. Enzyme deactivation in a bubble column, a stirred vessel and an inclined plane. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2003, 58, 5125-5134.
15. Joshi, J. B.; Sawant, S. B.; Patwardhan, A. W.; Patil, D. J.; Kshatriya, S. S.; Nere, N. K. Relation between flow pattern and deactivation of enzymes in stirred reactors. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2001, 56, 443-452.
16. Wang, N. S.; Yang, J. D.; Calabrese, R. V.; Chang, K. C. Unified modeling framework of cell death due to bubble in agitated and sparged bioreactors. J. Biotechnol. 1994, 33, 107-122.
17. Kim, M. H.; Lee, S. B.; Ryu, D. Y.; Reese, E. T. Surface deactivation of cellulase and its prevention. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1982, 4, 99-103.
18. Lee, Y. K.; Choo, C. L. The kinetic and mechanism of shear inactivation of lipase from Candida cylindracea. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1989, 33, 183-190.
19. Gordillo, M. A.; Obradors, N.; Montesinos, J. L.; Valero, F.; Lafuente, J.; Sola, C. Stability studies and effect of the initial oleic acid concentration on lipase product by Candida rugosa. Appl. Microbiol. Technol. 1995, 43, 38-41.
20. Charm, S. E.; Wong, B. L. Shear effect on enzymes. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1981, 3, 111-118.
21. Tirrell, M.; Middleman, S. Shear modification of enzyme kinetics. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1975, 17, 299-303.
22. Tirrell, M.; Middleman, S. Shear deformation effects on enzyme catalysis: Preliminary experimental results on lactic dehydrogenase. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1978, 20, 605-610.
23. Patwardhan, A. W.; Joshi, J. B. Relation between flow pattern and blending in stirred tanks. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1999, 61, 615-621.
24. Jolles, P. Lysozyme from rabbit spleen and dog spleen. In Methods in Enzymology; Colowik, S. P.; Kaplan, N. O., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 1965; pp 137-140.
25. Tatterson, G. B. Fluid Mixing and Gas Dispersion in Agitated Tanks; McGraw-Hill, Inc.: New York, 1991.
26. Calderbank, P. H. Physical rate processes in industrial fermentation, Part 1: The interfacial area in gas-liquid contacting with mechanical agitation. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 1958, 36, 443-459.
27. Chiesa, M.; Mathiesen, V.; Melheim, J. A.; Halvorsen, B. Numerical simulation of particulate flow by the Eulerian-Lagrangian and the Eulerian Eulerian approach with application to a fluidized bed. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2005, 29, 291-304.
28. Morsi, S. A.; Alexander, A. J. An investigation of particle trajectories in two phase flow system. J. Fluid Mech. 1972, 55 (2), 193-208.
29. Bakker, A.; Myers, K. J.; Ward, R. W.; Lee, C. K. Sliding mesh simulation of laminar flow in stirred tank. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 1997, 75, 42-44.
30. Harvey, A. D., III; Wood, S. P.; Leng, D. E. Experimental and computational study of multiple impeller flows. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1997, 52, 1479-1491.
31. Kresta, S. M.; Wood, P. E. Prediction of the three-dimensional flow in stirred tanks. AIChE J. 1991, 37, 448-460.
32. Thatte, A. R.; Ghadge, R. S.; Patwardhan, A. W.; Joshi, J. B. Local gas hold-up measurement in sparged and aerated tanks by gamma ray attenuation technique. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43, 5389-5399.
33. FLUENT 6.0; Fluent Inc.: Lebnon, NH, 2001.
34. Launder, B. E.; Spalding, D. B. Lectures in Mathematical Model of Turbulence; Academic Press: London, 1972.
35. Cutter, L. A. Flow and turbulence in stirred tank. AIChE J. 1966, 12, 35-45.
36. Wu, H.; Patterson, G. K. Laser-doppler measurements of turbulent flow parameters in a stirred mixer. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1989, 44, 2207-2221.
37. Zhou, G.; Kresta, S. M. Impact of tank geometry on the maximum turbulence energy dissipation rate for the impeller. AIChE J. 1996, 42 (9), 2476-2490.
38. Zhou, G.; Kresta, S. M. Distribution of energy between convective and turbulent flow for three frequently used impellers. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 1996, 74 (A), 379-389.
39. Ng, K.; Yianneskis, M. Observations on the distribution of energy dissipation in stirred vessels. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 2000, 78 (A), 334-341.
40. Bird, R. B.; Stewart, W. E.; Lightfoot, E. N. Transport Phenomena; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1982.
41. Deen, N. G.; Solberg, T.; Hjertager, B. H. Flow generated by an aerated ruston impeller: Two-phase PIV experiments and numerical simulation. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2002, 80 (4), 1-15.
42. Aubin, J.; Sauze, A. L.; Bertrand, J.; Fletcher, D. F.; Xuereb, C. PIV measurements of flow in aerated tank stirred by a down and up pumping axial flow impellers. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2004, 28, 447-456.
43. Morud, K. E.; Hjertager, B. H. LDA measurements and CFD modeling of gas-liquid flow in a stirred vessel. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1996, 51, 233-249.
44. Cherry, R. S.; Hulle, C. T. Cell death in thin films of bursting bubbles. Biotechnol. Prog. 1992, 8, 11-18.
45. Chisti, Y. Animal cell damage in sparged bioreactor. Trends Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 420-432.
46. Charm, S. E.; Wong, B. L. Enzyme inactivation with shearing. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1970, 12, 1103-1109.
47. Handa-Corrigan, A.; Emery, A. N.; Spier, R. E. Effect of gas-liquid interfaces on the growth suspended mammalian cells: Mechanism of cell damage by bubbles. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1989, 11, 230-235.
48. Justin, P.; Paul, G. C.; Nienow, A. W.; Thomas, C. R. Dependence of mycelial morphology on impeller type and agitation intensity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1996, 52, 672-682.
49. Gogate, P. R.; Beenackers, A. C. M.; Pandit, A. B. Multiple impeller system with special emphasis on bioreactors: A critical review. Biochem. Eng. J. 2000, 6, 109-144.
50. Smith, J. J.; Lilly, M. D.; Fox, R. I. The effect of agitation on the morphology and penicillin production of penicillium chrysogenum fermentation broth. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1989, 35, 1011-1021.
51. Aloi, L. E.; Cherry, R. S. Cellular response to agitation characterized by energy dissipation at the impeller plane. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1996, 51, 1523-1529.
52. Henzler, H.-J. Particle stress in bioreactors. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2000, 67, 35-47.
53. Prokop, A.; Rosenberg, M. Z. Bioreactor for mammalian cell culture, Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 1989, 39, 29-68.
54. Stoots, C. M.; Calabrese, R. V. Mean velocity field relative to a Rushton turbine. AIChE J. 1995, 41 (1), 1-11.
55. Yu, Z.; Rasmuson, A. Characterization of rotation symmetry of the impeller region in baffled agitated suspensions. In 10th European Conference on Mixing, Delft, The Netherlands, 2000; pp 423-430.
56. Ghadge, R. S.; Patwardhan, A. W., Sawant, S. B.; Joshi, J. B. Effect of flow pattern on cellulase deactivation in stirred tank bioreactors. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 1067-1083.