Effect of delivery timing interaction and disasters on co-supplier evaluation

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 44, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1845-1862

  Smith, N R ^a   Garza, D ^a   Hasenbein, J J ^b  

^a SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCES   (Mexico)

^b The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

Delivery; Disruption; Order splitting; Quality; Selection; Supplier

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PUBLIC POLICY; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOM PROCESSES;

DELIVERY; DISRUPTION; ORDER SPLITTING; QUALITY; SUPPLIER;

DISASTERS;

EID: 33744996290     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207540500456203     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alonso-Ayuso, A., Escudero, L.F., Garin, A., Ortuño, M.T. and Perez, G., An approach for strategic supply chain planning under uncertainty based on stochastic 0-1 programming. J. Glob. Optimizat., 2003, 26, 97-124.
2. Cakravastia, A. and Nakamura, N., Model for negotiating the price and due date for a single order with multiple suppliers in a make-to-order environment. Int. J. Prod. Res., 2002, 40, 3425-3440.
3. Cakravastia, A., Toha, I.S. and Nakamura, N., A two-stage model for the design of supply chain networks. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 2002, 80, 231-248.
4. Carreyrou, J., Peugeot has reason to watch GM strike - French concern also depends on single supplier. Wall Street Journal, 1998, 22 June.
5. Coleman, J.B. and Jennings, K.M., The UPS strike: lessons for just-in-timers. Prod. Inv. Manag. J., 1998, 39, 63-67.
6. D'Amours, S., Montreuil, B., Lefrancois, P. and Soumis, F., Networked manufacturing: the impact of information sharing. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 1999, 58, 63-79.
7. D'Amours, S., Montreuil, B. and Soumis, F., Price-based planning and scheduling of multiproduct orders in symbiotic manufacturing networks. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 1996, 96, 148-166.
8. Griffiths, J., To hold the line against chaos: carmakers dread production stoppages that rattle the entire supply chain. Financial Times (London), 1999, 14 January.
9. Hong, J.D. and Hayya, J.C., Just-in-time purchasing: single or multiple sourcing?. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 1992, 27, 175-181.
10. Iman, R.L., A Data-based Approach to Statistics. 1995 (New York, NY: Duxbury).
11. Kalman, V.R. and Tan, A.C., Supplier selection and assessment: their impact on business performance. J. Suppl. Chain Manag., 2002, 38, 11-21.
12. Kasilingam, R.G. and Lee, C.P., Selection of vendors - a mixed-integer programming approach. Comput. Ind. Eng., 1996, 31, 347-350.
13. Kelle, P. and Miller, P.A., Stockout risk and order splitting. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 2001, 71, 407-415.
14. Kelle, P. and Silver, E.A., Decreasing expected shortages through order splitting. Eng. Costs Prod. Econ., 1990, 19, 351-357.
15. Lau, H.S. and Zhao, L.G., Optimal ordering policies with two suppliers lead times and demands are all stochastic. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 1993, 68, 120-133.
16. Levy, D.L., International sourcing and supply chain stability. J. Int. Bus. Stud., 1995, 26, 343-360.
17. Li, D. and O'Brien, C., Integrated decision modelling of supply chain efficiency. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 1999, 59, 147-157.
18. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), IV. Economic consequences of terrorism. OECD Econ. Outlook, 2002, 71, 117-140.
19. Papadakis, I.S., On the sensitivity of configure-to-order supply chains for personal computers after component market disruptions. Int. J. Physic. Distr. Log. Manag., 2003, 33, 934-950.
20. Porter, A.M., Single sourcing - some love it, most fear it. Purchasing, 1999, 126, 22-24.
21. Russell, S.H., Logistics crime - knowing and managing the risks. Air Force J. Logist., 2000, 24, 16.
22. Ryu, S.W. and Lee, K.K., A stochastic inventory model of dual sourced supply chain with lead time reduction. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 2003, 81, 513-524.
23. Sculli, D. and Wu, S.Y., Stock control with two suppliers and normal lead times. J. Oper. Res. Soc., 1981, 32, 1003-1009.
24. Sedarage, D., Fujiwara, O. and Luong, H.T., Determining optimal order splitting and reorder level for n-supplier inventory systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 1999, 116, 389-404.
25. Talluri, S. and Narasimhan, R., Vendor evaluation with performance variability: a max-min approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2003, 146, 543-552.
26. Weber, C.A. and Current, J.R., A multiobjective approach to vendor selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 1993, 68, 173-184.
27. Weber, C.A., Current, J.R. and Benton, W.C., Vendor selection criteria and methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 1991, 50, 2-18.
28. Weber, C.A., Current, J.R. and Desai, A., An optimization approach to determining the number of vendors to employ. Suppl. Chain Manag., 2000, 5, 90-98.
29. Zeng, A.Z., Single or multiple sourcing: an integrated optimization framework for sustaining time-based competitiveness. J. Market. Theory Prac., 1998, 6, 10-25.
30. Zhao, L.G. and Lau, H.S., Reducing inventory costs and choosing suppliers with order splitting. J. Oper. Res. Soc., 1992, 43, 1003-1008.