Utility of nuclear allele networks for the analysis of closely related species in the genus Carabus, subgenus Ohomopterus

Systematic Biology

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 329-344

  Sota, Teiji ^a   Sasabe, Masataka ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Gene genealogy; Introgression; Mitochondrial DNA; Nuclear DNA; Phylogeny; Recombination; Species relationship

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEETLE; CLASSIFICATION; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MALE; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; BEETLES; DNA; GENETIC SPECIATION; MALE; PHYLOGENY; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 33744971884     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150500541607     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Antunes, A., A. R. Templeton, R. Guyomard, and P. Alexandrino. 2002. The role of nuclear genes in intraspecific evolutionary inference: Genealogy of the transferrin gene in the brown trout. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:1272-1287.
2. Arnold, M. L. 1997. Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.
3. Ballard, J. W. O., and M. C. Whitlock. 2004. The incomplete natural history of mitochondria. Mol. Ecol. 13:729-744. (Pubitemid 38390584)
4. Broughton, R. E., and R. G. Harrison. 2003. Nuclear gene genealogies reveal historical, demographic and selective factors associated with speciation in field crickets. Genetics 163:1389-1401. (Pubitemid 36523390)
5. Brower, A. V. Z. 1999. Delimitation of phylogenetic species with DNA sequences: A critique of Davis and Nixon's population aggregation analyis. Syst. Biol. 48:199-213. (Pubitemid 129481133)
6. Brower, A. V. Z., R. DeSalle, and A. Vogler. 1996. Gene trees, species trees, and systematics: A cladistic perspective. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27:423-450. (Pubitemid 27079291)
7. Cassens, I., P. Mardulyn, and M. C. Milinkovitch. 2005. Evaluating intraspecific "network" construction methods using simulated sequence data: Do existing algorithms outperform the global maximum parsimony approach? Syst. Biol. 54:363-372. (Pubitemid 41040437)
8. Clement, M., D. Posada, and K. A. Crandall. 2000. TCS: A computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 9:1657-1660.
9. Crandall, K. A., and A. R. Templeton. 1999. Statistical approaches to detecting recombination. Pages 153-176 in The evolution of HIV (K. A. Crandall, ed.). The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
10. Danforth, B. N., and S. Ji. 1998. Elongation factor-1α occurs at least two copies in bees: Implications for phylogenetic analysis of EF-1aα sequences in insects. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:222-235.
11. Doyle, J. J. 1995. The irrelevance of allele tree topologies for species delimitation, and a non-topological alternative. Syst. Bot. 20:574-588.
12. Doyle, J. J. 1997. Trees within trees: Genes and species, molecules and morphology. Syst. Biol. 46:537-553. (Pubitemid 127386650)
13. Felsenstein, J. 2004. PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package), version 3.6. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
14. Funk, D. J., and K. E. Omland. 2003. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: Frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34:397-423. (Pubitemid 38171425)
15. Harrison, R. G. 1990. Hybrid zones: Windows on evolutionary process. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 7:69-128.
16. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
17. Ishikawa, R. 1985. The subfamily Carabinae. Pages 14-54 in The Coleoptera of japan in color, volume II (S. Ueno, Y. Kurosawa, and M. Sato, eds.). Hoikusha, Osaka.
18. Ishikawa, R. 1991. The evolution of Carabus. Divergence and isolating mechanisms. (In Japanese.) Yasaka-shobo, Tokyo.
19. Kanagawa, T. 2003. Bias and artifacts in multitemplate polymerase chain reactions (PCR). J. Biosci. Bioeng. 96:317-323. (Pubitemid 37500201)
20. Kubota, K. 1988. Natural hybridization between Carabus (Ohomopterus) maiyasanus and C. (O.) iwawakianus (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Kontyu, Tokyo 56:370-378.
21. Kubota, K., and T. Sota. 1998. Hybridization and speciation in the carabid beetles of the subgenus Ohomopterus (Coleoptera, Carabidae, genus Carabus). Res. Popul. Ecol. 40:213-222. (Pubitemid 128448753)
22. Lutzoni, F., P. Wagner, V. Reeb, and S. Zoller. 2000. Integrating ambiguously aligned regions of DNA sequences in phylogenetic analysis without violating positional homology. Syst. Biol. 49:628-651. (Pubitemid 33213082)
23. Machado, C. A., and J. Hey. 2003. The causes of phylgenetic conflict in a classic Drosophila species group. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 270:1193-1202. (Pubitemid 36683465)
24. Maddison, W. P. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46:523-536.
25. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
26. Okuyama, Y, N. Fujii, M. Wakabayashi, A. Kawakita, M. Ito, M. Watanabe, N. Murakami, and M. Kato. 2005. Nonuniform concerted evolution and chloroplast capture: Heterogeneity of observed introgression patterns in three molecular data partition phylogenies of Asian Mitella (Saxifragaceae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:285-296. (Pubitemid 40130196)
27. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818. (Pubitemid 28552116)
28. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 2001a. Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNA sequences: Computer simulations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 98:13757-13762. (Pubitemid 33115971)
29. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 2001b. Intraspecific gene genealogies: Trees grafting into networks. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:37-45. (Pubitemid 32102347)
30. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 2002. The effect of recombination on the accuracy of phylogeny estimation. J. Mol. Evol. 54:396-402. (Pubitemid 34165424)
31. Posada, D., K. A. Crandall, and A. R. Templeton. 2000. GeoDis: A program for the cladistic nested analysis of the geographical distribution of genetic haplotypes. Mol. Ecol. 9:487-488. (Pubitemid 30213314)
32. Reynolds, J., B. S. Weir, and C. C. Cockerham. 1983. Estimation for the coancestry coefficient: Basis for a short-term genetic distance. Genetics 105:767-779. (Pubitemid 14246280)
33. Rozas, J., M. Gullaud, G. Blandin, and M. Aguade". 2001. DNA variation at the rp49 gene region of Drosophila simulans: Evolutionary inferences from an unusual haplotype structure. Genetics 158:1147-1155. (Pubitemid 32667100)
34. Saitou, N., and M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406-425.
35. Schierup, M. H., and J. Hein. 2000. Consequences of recombination on traditional phylogenetic analysis. Genetics 156:879-891.
36. Schneider, S., D. Roesseli, and L. Excoffier. 2000. Arlequin version 2.000. A software for population genetics data analysis. University of Geneva, Geneva.
37. Sites, J. W. Jr., and J. C. Marshall. 2004. Operational criteria for delimiting species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35:199-227.
38. Sorenson, M. D. 1999. TreeRot, version 2. Boston University, Boston.
39. Sota, T. 1985. Life history patterns of carabid beetles belonging to the subtribe Carabina (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in the Kinki District, western Japan. Kontyu, Tokyo 53:370-378.
40. Sota, T. 2002. Radiation and reticulation: Extensive introgressive hybridization in the carabid beetles Ohomopterus inferred from mitochondrial gene genealogy. Popul. Ecol. 44:145-156. (Pubitemid 36198851)
41. Sota, T, R. Ishikawa, M. Ujiie, F. Kusumoto, and A. P. Vogler. 2001. Extensive trans-species mitochondrial polymorphisms in the carabid beetles Carabus subgenus Ohomopterus caused by repeated introgressive hybridization. Mol. Ecol. 10:2833-2847. (Pubitemid 34115520)
42. Sota, T, and K. Kubota. 1998. Genital lock-and-key as a selective agent against hybridization. Evolution 52:1507-1513. (Pubitemid 28539806)
43. Sota, T, and A. P. Vogler. 2001. Incongruence between mitochondrial and nuclear gene trees in the carabid beetles Ohomopterus. Syst. Biol. 50:39-59.
44. Sota, T, and A. P. Vogler. 2003. Reconstructing species phylogeny of the carabid beetles Ohomopterus using multiple nuclear DNA sequences: Heterogeneous information content and the performance of simultaneous analysis. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 26:139-154. (Pubitemid 36029260)
45. Sota, T, Y. Takami, K. Kubota, M. Ujiie, and R. Ishikawa. 2000. Interspecific body size differentiation in species assemblages of the carabid subgenus Ohomopterus in Japan. Popul. Ecol. 42:279-291. (Pubitemid 32143304)
46. Su, Z. H., O. Tominaga, T. Ohama, E. Kajiwara, R. Ishikawa, T. S. Okada, K. Nakamura, and S. Osawa. 1996. Parallel evolution in radiation of Ohomopterus ground beetles inferred from mitochondrial ND5 gene sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 43:662-671. (Pubitemid 27024021)
47. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*, Phylogenetic analysis using parisimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
48. Takami, Y. 2000. Phylogeny of the subgenus Ohomopterus (Coleoptera, Carabidae, genus Carabus): A morphological aspect. Tokyo Metropolitan Univ. Bull. Nat. Hist. 4:1-32.
49. Takami, Y, and H. Suzuki. 2005. Morphological, genetic and behavioural analyses of a hybrid zone between the ground beetles Carabus leiuisianus and C. albrechti (Coleoptera, Carabidae): Asymmetrical introgression caused by movement of the zone? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 86:79-94. (Pubitemid 41312487)
50. Templeton, A. R. 1994. The role of molecular genetics in speciation studies. Pages 455-457 in Molecular ecology and evolution: Approaches and applications (B. Schierwater, B. Streit, G. P. Wagner, and R. DeSalle, eds.) Birkhauser-Verlag, Basel.
51. Templeton, A. R. 1998. Nested clade analyses of phylogeographic data: Testing hypotheses about gene flow and population history. Mol. Ecol. 7:381-397. (Pubitemid 28226687)
52. Templeton, A. R. 2001a. Using phylogeographic analysis of gene trees to test species status and process. Mol. Ecol. 10:779-791. (Pubitemid 32406360)
53. Templeton, A. R. 2001b. The meaning of species and speciation: A genetic perspective. Pages 3-27 in Speciation and its consequences (D. Otte, and J. A. Endler, eds.) Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
54. Templeton, A. R., E. Boerwinkle, and C. F. Sing. 1987. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping. I. Basic theory and an analysis of alchol dehydrogenase activity in Drosophila. Genetics 117:343-351.
55. Templeton, A. R., K. A. Crandall, and C. F. Sing. 1992. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132:619-633.
56. Templeton, A. R., and C. F. Sing. 1993. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping. IV. Nested analysis with cladogram uncertainty and recombination. Genetics 134:659-669. (Pubitemid 23156958)
57. Worobey, M. 2001. A novel approach to detecting and measuring recombination: New insights into evolution in viruses, bacteria, and mitochondria. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1425-1434. (Pubitemid 32735090)
58. Wu, C. I. 2001. The genie view of the process of speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 14:851-865.
59. Zhang, A. B., K. Kubota, Y. Takami, J. L. Kim, J. K. Kim, and T. Sota. 2005. Species status and phylogeography of two closely related Coptolabrus species (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in South Korea inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences. Mol. Ecol. 14:3823-3841.