The impact of commuters' travel pattern on urban structure: A case study in some typical communities in Guangzhou

Dili Xuebao/Acta Geographica Sinica

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 179-189

  Zhou, Suhong ^a   Yan, Xiaopei ^a  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

City; Guangzhou; Model; Spacial analysis; Travel pattern

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; URBAN AREA;

ASIA; CHINA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; GUANGDONG; GUANGZHOU;

EID: 33744958203     PISSN: 03755444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Mackett R L. Comparative analysis of modelling land-use transport interaction at the micro and macro levels. Environment and Planning A, 1990, 22: 459-475.
2. Anas A. NYSIM (The New York Simulation Model): A Model of Cost-Benefit Analysis of Transportation Projects. New York: New York Regional Planning Association, 1992.
3. Mackett R L. MASTER Model. (Micro-Analytical Simulation of Transport, Employment and Residence). In: Frank Southworth. A Technical Review of Urban Land Use-Transportation Models as Tools for Evaluating Vehicle Travel Reduction Strategies. http://ntl.bts.gov/DOCS/ornl.html, 2002-10-15.
4. K Lynch. Translated by Fang Yiping, He Xiaojun. The Image of the City. Beijing: Hua Xia Press, 2001.
5. Chai Yanwei. Methodological problems in behavioral geography study. Areal Research and Development, 2005, 24(2): 1-5.
6. Chai Yanwei. Time geography: its origin, key concepts and applications. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 1998, 18(1): 65-72.
7. Wang Xingzhong. Urban Social Structure in China. Beijing: Science Press, 2000.
8. Kain J F, Apgar W C Jr. Housing and Neighborhood Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.
9. Jan Veldhuisen, Harry Timmermans, Loek Kapoen. RAMBLS: a regional model based on the micro simulation of daily activity travel patterns. Environment and Planning A, 2000, (3).
10. Berechman J, Small K A. Research policy and review: 25. modeling land use and transportation: an interpretive review for growth areas. Environment and Planning A, 1988, 20: 1285-1309.
11. Badoe D A, Miller E J. Transportation Research Part D5, 2000: 235-263.
12. Pushkarev B, Zupan J. Public Transportation and Land Use Policy. Indiana University Press, 1977.
13. Levinson David. Accessibility and the journey to work. Journal/ Publisher: J. of Transport Geography, 1992, 6(1): 11-21.
14. Cevero R. America's Suburban Centers: The Land-use-Transportation Link. Unwin Hyman Inc., 1989.
15. Ewing R. Beyond density, mode-choice, and single-purpose trips. Presented at the 74th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, January 1995.
16. Jobs-housing balance revisited Cervero, Robert. American Planning Association. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1996, 62(4): 492..
17. Zhou Suhong, Yang Lijun. Study on the spatial characteristic of commuting in Guangzhou. Urban Transport of China. 2005, (1): 62-67.
18. Laurence J C Ma. Human ism, the rise of postmodernism and the development of new regional geography in the West. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1999, 54(4): 365-372.
19. Zhou Suhong, Yan Xiaopei. The relationship between uban structure and traffic demand in Guangzhou. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(1): 130-141.
20. Zhang Wenkui. An Introduction to Human Geography (3rd edn.). Changchun: Northeast Normal University Press, 1997. 27-30, 98.