Dynamic profiling and trace cache generation

International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization, CGO 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 276-285

  Berndl, M ^a   Hendren, L ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Computer science; Design optimization; Java; Magnetohydrodynamic power generation; Optimization methods; Optimizing compilers; Power generation; Runtime; Stability criteria; Virtual machining

Indexed keywords

CODES (SYMBOLS); COMPUTER SCIENCE; JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC POWER GENERATION; MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS; NETWORK COMPONENTS; POWER GENERATION;

DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; JAVA; OPTIMIZATION METHOD; OPTIMIZING COMPILERS; RUNTIMES; VIRTUAL MACHINING;

STABILITY CRITERIA;

EID: 33744946483     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CGO.2003.1191552     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. M. Arnold, M. Hind, and B. G. Ryder. Online instrumentation and feedback-directed optimization of java. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages and Applications (OOPSLA '02), pages 111-129, November 2002.
2. M. Arnold and B. G. Ryder. A framework for reducing the cost of instrumented code. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN'01 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation. ACM Press, 2001.
3. V. Bala, E. Duesterwald, and S. Banerjia. Dynamo: A transparent dynamic optimization system. In SIGPLAN '00 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pages 1-12, 2000.
4. T. Ball and J. R. Larus. Efficient path profiling. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pages 46-57. ACM Press, 1996.
5. W.-K. Chen, S. Lerner, R. Chaiken, and D. Gillies. Mojo: A dynamic optimization system. In Proceedings of the Third ACM Workshop on Feedback-Directed and Dynamic Optimization (FDDO-3), December 2000.
6. E. Duesterwald and D. Bruening. Exploring optimal compilations unit shapes for an embedded just-in-time compiler. In Proceedings of the Third ACM Workshop on Feedback-Directed and Dynamic Optimization (FDDO-3), December 2000.
7. E. Gagnon. A Portable Research Framework for the Execution of Java Bytecode. PhD thesis, McGill University, December 2002.
8. B. Grant, M. Mock, M. Philipose, C. Chambers, and S. J. Eggers. DyC: an expressive annotation-directed dynamic compiler for C. Theoretical Computer Science, 248(1-2):147-199, October 2000.
9. S. J. Patel and S. S. Lumetta. rePLay: A hardware framework for dynamic program optimization. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 50(6):590-608, June 2001.
10. I. Piumarta and F. Riccardi. Optimizing direct threaded code by selective inlining. In SIGPLAN '98 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pages 291-300. ACM Press, June 1998.
11. R. Radhakrishnan, N. Vijaykrishnan, L. K. John, A. Sivasubramaniam, J. Rubio, and J. Sabaqrinathan. Java runtime systems: Characterization and architectural implications. In IEEE Transactions on Computers, pages 131-146. 502, February 2001.
12. O. Traub, S. Schecter, and M. D. Smith. Ephemeral instrumentation for lightweight program profiling. Technical report, Harvard, June 2000. Unpublished technical report, available at: http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/hube/publications/muck.pdf.
13. J. Whaley. Partial method compilation using dynamic profile information. In Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages & Applications (OOPSLA '01), pages 166-179, 2001.
14. R. C. Young. Path Based Compilation. PhD thesis, Harvard University, January 1998.