The spatial model and the Senate trial of President Clinton

American Politics Research

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 535-559

  Bertelli, Anthony M ^a   Grose, Christian R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Executive legislative relations; Impeachment; President Clinton; Spatial voting model; U.S. presidency; U.S. Senate

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744920358     PISSN: 1532673X     EISSN: 15523373     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X05282848     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Abramowitz, A. I. (2001). Its Monica, stupid: The impeachment controversy and the 1998 mid-term election. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 26, 211-226.
2. Ackerman, B. (1999). The case against lameduck impeachment. New York: Seven Stories Press.
3. Adler, D., & Kassop, N. (2002). The impeachment of Bill Clinton. In D. Adler & M. Genovese (Eds.), The presidency and the law: The Clinton legacy (pp. 155-174). Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
4. Amar, A. R. (1999). Reflections on the process, the results, and the future: On impeaching presidents. Hofstra Law Review, 28, 291-341.
5. Blumenthal, S. (2003). The Clinton wars. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
6. Busby, R. (2001). Defending the American presidency: Clinton and the Lewinsky scandal. London: Palgrave.
7. Caldeira, G. A., & Zorn, C. (2004). Strategic timing, position-taking, and impeachment in the House of Representatives. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 517-527.
8. Cameron, C. M. (2002). Studying the polarized presidency. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 32, 647-663.
9. Campbell, M. (1999, February 14). Clinton's attack dogs go out looking for a bloody revenge. Sunday Times (London). Retrieved from Lexis-Nexis database.
10. Clinton, J., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The statistical analysis of roll call data. American Political Science Review, 98, 355-370.
11. Cohn, M. (2000). Open-and-shut: Senate impeachment deliberations must be public. Hastings Law Journal, 51, 365-409.
12. Cooper, C. J. (1999). A perjurer in the White House? The constitutional case for perjury and obstruction of justice as high crimes and misdemeanors. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 22, 619-645.
13. Cooper, J. M. (2001). Impeachment: A (civil) religious perspective. In L. Kaplan & B. Moran (Eds.), Aftermath: The Clinton impeachment and the presidency in the age of political spectacle (pp. 150-161). New York: New York University Press.
14. Davidson, R. H., & Campbell, C. C. (2000). The Senate and the executive. In B. A. Loomis (Ed.), Esteemed colleagues: Civility and deliberation in the U.S. Senate (pp. 194-222). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
15. Drinan, R. F. (1999). Reflections on lawyers, legal ethics, and the Clinton impeachment. Fordham Law Review, 68, 559-565.
16. Enelow, J., & Hinich, M. J. (1984). The spatial theory of voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Gerhardt, M. J. (1999). Putting the law of impeachment in perspective. Saint Louis University Law Journal, 43, 905-930.
18. Gerhardt, M. J. (2000a). The federal impeachment process: A constitutional and historical analysis (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Gerhardt, M. J. (2000b). The impeachment and acquittal of William Jefferson Clinton. In M. Rozell & C. Wilcox (Eds.), The Clinton scandal and the future of American government (pp. 142-170). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
20. Jackman, S. (2003). IDEAL: Ideal point estimation and roll call analysis via Bayesian simulation. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
21. Jacobson, G. C. (2001). A House and Senate divided: The Clinton legacy and the congressional elections of 2000. Political Science Quarterly, 116, 5-27.
22. Jenkins, J. A., & Nokken, T. P. (2000). The institutional origins of the Republican party: Spatial voting and the House speakership election of 1855-56. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25, 101-130.
23. Jenkins, J. A., & Sala, B. R. (1998). The spatial theory of voting and the presidential election of 1824. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 1157-1179.
24. Kassop, N. (2000). The law: The Clinton impeachment: Untangling the web of conflicting considerations. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 30, 359-373.
25. Klarman, M. J. (1999). Constitutional fetishism and the Clinton impeachment debate. Virginia Law Review, 85, 631-659.
26. Krehbiel, K. (1998). Pivotal politics: A theory of U.S. lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Kreps, D. M., & Porteus, E. L. (1979). Temporal Von Neumann-Morgenstern and induced preferences. Journal of Economic Theory, 20, 81-109.
28. Lanoue, D. J., & Emmert, C. F. (1999). Voting in the glare of the spotlight: Representatives' votes on the impeachment of President Clinton. Polity, 32, 253-269.
29. Laver, M., & Benoit, K. (2002). Locating TDs in policy spaces: Wordscoring Dáil speeches. Irish Political Studies, 17, 59-73.
30. Laver, M., Benoit, K., & Garry, J. (2003). Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review, 97, 311-331.
31. Lumby, C. (2001). The president's penis: Entertaining sex and power. In L. Berlant & L. Duggan (Eds.), Our Monica, ourselves (pp. 225-236). New York: New York University Press.
32. Martin, A. D., & Quinn, K. M. (2002). Dynamic ideal point estimation via Markov chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953-1999. Political Analysis, 10, 134-153.
33. Mayhew, D. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34. Mayhew, D. (2001). Observations on Congress: The electoral connection a quarter century after writing it. PS: Political Science and Politics, 34, 251-252.
35. Moraski, B. J., & Shipan, C. R. (1999). The politics of Supreme Court nominations: A theory of institutional constraints and choices. American Journal of Political Science, 43, 1069-1095.
36. Morris, I. L. (2002). Votes, money, and the Clinton impeachment. Boulder, CO: Westview.
37. Ornstein, N. J. (2000). Civility, deliberation, and impeachment. In B. A. Loomis (Ed.), Esteemed colleagues: Civility and deliberation in the U.S. Senate (pp. 223-240). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
38. Pitney, J. J., Jr. (2000). Clinton and the Republican Party. In S. E. Schier (Ed.), The postmodern presidency: Bill Clinton's legacy in U.S. politics (pp. 167-182). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
39. Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1997). Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Posner, R. (1999). An affair of state: The investigation, impeachment, and trial of President Clinton. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Posner, R. (2000). Dworkin, polemics, and the Clinton impeachment controversy. Northwestern University Law Review, 94, 1023-1047.
42. Rae, N. C., & Campbell, C. C. (2004). Impeaching Clinton: Partisan strife on Capitol Hill. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
43. Rhode, D. L. (2000). Conflicts of commitment: Legal ethics in the impeachment context. Stanford Law Review, 52, 269-351.
44. Rockman, B. A. (1996). Leadership style and the Clinton presidency. In C. Campbell & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), The Clinton presidency: First appraisals (pp. 325-363). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
45. Rothenberg, L. S., & Sanders, M. S. (2000). Lame-duck politics: Impending departure and the votes on impeachment. Political Research Quarterly, 53, 523-536.
46. Schier, S. E. (2000). A unique presidency. In S. E. Schier (Ed.), The postmodern presidency: Bill Clinton's legacy in U.S. politics (pp. 1-16). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
47. Schippers, D., & Henry, A. P. (2000). Sellout. Washington, DC: Regnery.
48. Simon, W. H. (2001). Moral pluck: Legal ethics in popular culture. Columbia Law Review, 101, 421-447.
49. Skowronek, S. (1997). The politics presidents make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
50. Sullivan, T. (1998). Impeachment practice in the era of lethal conflict. Congress and the Presidency, 25, 117-128.
51. Thompson, J. (1999, January 6). Plan for short trial splits four senators. Omaha World Herald, p. 2-2.
52. Tushnet, M. (2001). The constitutional politics of the Clinton impeachment. In L. Kaplan & B. Moran (Eds.), Aftermath: The Clinton impeachment and the presidency in the age of political spectacle (pp. 162-178). New York: New York University Press.