Input-output modeling, outdoor recreation, and the economic impacts of weeds

Weed Science

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 130-137

  Eiswerth, Mark E ^a   Darden, Tim D ^b   Johnson, Wayne S ^c   Agapoff, Jeanmarie ^d   Harris, Thomas R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN WHITEWATER   (United States)

^b NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^d United States of America   (United States)

Author keywords

Economic impacts; Input output analysis; Invasive weeds; Nonindigenous species; Recreation

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC IMPACT; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; INVASIVE SPECIES; OUTDOOR RECREATION; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; WEED;

NEVADA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33744904534     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WS-04-022R     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bangsund, D. A., F. L. Leistritz, and J. A. Leiten. 1999. Assessing economic impacts of biological control of weeds: the case of leafy spurge in the northern Great Plains of the United States. J. Environ. Manag. 56: 35-43.
2. Bell, C. E. 1996. Saltcedar: A Non-native Invasive Plant in the Western U.S. Berkeley, California: University of California Cooperative Extension Service. Pp. 1-4.
3. Callihan, R. and J. Evans. 1991. Weed dynamics on rangeland. Pages 55-61 in L. F. James, J. O. Evans, M. E. Ralphs, and R. D. Childs, eds. Noxious Range Weeds. Boulder, CO: Westview.
4. D'Antonio, C. M. and P. M. Vitousek. 1992. Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3:63-87.
5. Eiswerth, M. E., S. Donaldson, and W. S. Johnson. 2000. Potential environmental impacts and economic damages of Eurasian watermilfoil in western Nevada and northeastern California. Weed Technol. 14:511-518.
6. Eiswerth, M. E. and W. S. Johnson. 2002. Managing nonindigenous invasive species: insights from dynamic analysis. Environ. Resour. Econ. 23:319-342.
7. Eiswerth, M. E. and G. C. van Kooten. 2002. Uncertainty, economics, and the spread of an invasive plant species. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 84:1317-1322.
8. Jones, R. E. and R. W. Medd. 2000. Economic thresholds and the case for longer term approaches to population management of weeds. Weed Technol. 14:337-350.
9. Larson, L. L. and R. L. Sheley. 1994. Ecological relationships between yellow starthistle and cheatgrass. Pages 92-94 in S. B. Monsen and S. G. Kitchen, eds. Proceedings of Ecology and Management of Annual Rangelands. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service General Technical Report. INT-GTR-313.
10. Leistritz, F. L., F. Thompson, and J. A. Leitch. 1992. Economic impact of leafy spurge in North Dakota. Weed Sci. 40:275-280.
11. Leitch, J. A., F. L. Leistritz, and D. A. Bangsund. 1996. Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: methods, models, and results. Impact Assessment 14:419-433.
12. Mack, R. N. 1981. Invasion of Bromus tectorum L. into Western North America: an ecological chronicle. Agro-Ecosystems 7:145-165.
13. Madsen, J. D. 1997. Methods for management of nonindigenous aquatic plants. Pages 145-171 in J. O. Luken and J. W. Thieret, eds. Assessment and Management of Plant Invasions. New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. Madsen, J. D., J. W. Sutherland, J. A. Bloomfield, L. W. Eichler, and C. W. Boylen. 1991. The decline of native vegetation under dense Eurasian watermilfoil canopies. J. Aquat. Plant Manag. 29:94-99.
15. McKell, C. M., J. P. Robison, and J. Major. 1962. Ecotypic variation in medusahead, an introduced annual grass. Ecology 43:686-698.
16. Miller, R. and P. Blair. 1985. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Pp. 6-39.
17. Minnesota IMPLAN Group Inc. 2000. IMPLAN Professionals™, Version 2.0, Social Accounting & Impact Analysis Software. Stillwater, MN: Minnesota IMPLAN Group. Pp. 1-48.
18. Newroth, P. R. 1985. A review of Eurasian water milfoil impacts and management in British Columbia. Pages 139-153 in Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) and Related Haloragaceae Species, July 23-24, 1985, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Vicksburg, MS: Aquatic Plant Management Society.
19. Olson, B. E. 1999. Impacts of noxious weeds on ecologic and economic systems. Pages 4-18 in R. L. Sheley and J. K. Petroff, eds. Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
20. Roche, B. F., Jr. and C. T. Roche. 1991. Identification, introduction, distribution, ecology, and economics of Centaurea species. Pages 274-291 in L. F. James, J. O. Evans, M. E. Ralphs, and R. D. Childs, eds. Noxious Range Weeds. Boulder, CO: Westview.
21. Roche, B. F., Jr. and C. T. Roche. 1999. Diffuse knapweed. Pages 217-230 in R. L. Sheley and J. K. Petroff, eds. Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
22. Roche, C. T. and D. C. Thill. 2001. Biology of common crupina and yellow starthistle, two Mediterranean winter annual invaders in western North America. Weed Sci. 49:439-447.
23. Rosentrater, R. 1994. Displacement of rare plants by exotic grasses. Pages 170-175 in S. B. Monsen and S. G. Kitchen, eds. Proceedings of Ecology and Management of Annual Rangelands. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service General Technical Report. INT-GTR-313.
24. Sala, A., S. D. Smith, and D. A. Devitt. 1996. Water use by Tamarix ramosissima and associated phreatophtyes in a Mojave Desert flood-plain. Ecol. Appl. 6:888-898.
25. Sheley, R. L., J. M. Hudak, and R. T. Grubb. 1999a. Rush skeletonweed. Pages 308-314 in R. L. Sheley and J. K. Petroff, eds. Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
26. Sheley, R. L., J. S. Jacobs, and M. L. Carpinelli. 1999b. Spotted knapweed. Pages 350-361 in R. L. Sheley and J. K. Petroff, eds. Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
27. Sheley, R. L., M. E. Manoukian, and G. Marks. 1996. Preventing noxious weed invasion. Rangelands 18:100-101.
28. Smith, H. A., W. S. Johnson, J. S. Shonkwiler, and S. R. Swanson. 1999. The implications of variable or constant expansion rates in invasive weed infestations. Weed Sci. 47:62-66.
29. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2000. Annual Benchmark Report for Retail Trade, January 1990 to December 1999, Current Business Reports Series, BR/99-A. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 34 p.
30. U.S. Department of Commerce. 2001. 2000 Personal Income, Industry Earnings, and Industry Employment for Nevada Counties. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Economic Information System. Table SA25.
31. [USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1996. 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Pp. 105-115.
32. Whitson, T. D. 1999. Russian knapweed. Pages 315-322 in R. L. Sheley and J. K. Petroff, eds. Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
33. Young, J. A. and W. S. Longland. 1996. Impact of alien plants on Great Basin rangelands. Weed Technol. 10:384-391.
34. Young, J. A., E. Martens, and N. E. West. 1992. Germination of bur buttercup seeds. J. Range Manag. 45:358-362.