The implications of variable or constant expansion rates in invasive weed infestations

Weed Science

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 62-66

  Smith, H Arlen ^a   Johnson, Wayne S ^b   Shonkwiler, J Scott ^b   Swanson, Sherm R ^b  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

Eradication and revegetation costs; Infestation expansion paths; Invasive weeds; Present value

Indexed keywords

THEORETICAL STUDY; WEED CONTROL;

EID: 0032973161     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0043174500090664     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Asher, J. 1985. Northwest Area Noxious Weed Control Program: Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix C1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Oregon State Office, p. 152.
2. Callihan, R. and J. Evans. 1991. Weed dynamics on rangeland. Pages 55-61 in L. F. James, J. O. Evans, M. E. Ralphs, and R. D. Childs, eds. Noxious Range Weeds. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
3. Cousens, R. and M. Mortimer. 1995. Dynamics of Weed Populations. Cambridge, Great Britain: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21-54.
4. Forcella, F. 1985. Final distribution is related to rate of spread in alien weeds. Weed Res. 25:181-191.
5. Roche, B., J. Lacey, T. Bedell, and K. Sanders. 1994. Knapweed. Pages 1-4 in Washington Interagency Knapweed Committee Newsletter. Volume 8, No. 1. Pullman, WA: Washington State Cooperative Extension Service.
6. Sheley, R., T. Svejcar, B. Maxwell, and J. Jacobs. 1996. Successional rangeland weed management. Rangelands 18:155-159.