Co-evolution in an organization population of which knowledge-intensive service organizations form a part

2005 International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management, Proceedings of ICSSSM'05

Volumn 2, Issue , 2005, Pages 880-885

  Peltoniemi, Mirva J ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Co evolution; Knowledge intensive service organization; Organization population

Indexed keywords

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; FEEDBACK; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

CO-EVOLUTION; INTERCONNECTEDNESS; KNOWLEDGE-INTENSIVE SERVICE (KIS) ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION POPULATION;

KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION;

EID: 33744823708     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICSSSM.2005.1500118     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. M. Peltoniemi, Business Ecosystem: A Conceptual Model of an Organisation Population from the Perspectives of Complexity and Evolution. Tampere, Finland: e-BRC Research Reports 18, 2005. Available: www.ebrc.fi
2. J. Liedtka, "Ethics and the new economy," Business and Society Review, vol. 107, pp. 1-19, Jan. 2002.
3. K. Kelly, New Rules for the New Economy. New York: Penguin Books, 1998.
4. P. Cooke, Knowledge Economies: Clusters, Learning and Cooperative Advantage. London: Routledge, 2002.
5. J. Kuusisto and M. Meyer, Insights into Services and Innovation in the Knowledge Intensive Economy. Helsinki, Finland: Tekes Technology Review 134, 2003. Available: www.tekes.fi
6. S. Kemppilä, and P. Mettänen, "Innovations in knowledge-intensive services," in Proc. 5th Int. CINet Conf., Sydney, 2004, pp. 326-335.
7. M. Maula. "The senses and memory of a firm - implications of autopoiesis theory for knowledge management," Journal of Knowledge Management., vol. 4, pp. 157-161, 2000.
8. T. A. Bryant and R. A. Reenstra-Bryant, "Technology brokers in the North American software industry," Int. Journal of Technology Management, vol. 16, pp. 281-290, 1998.
9. A. Hardagon, and R. I. Sutton, "Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm," Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 42, pp. 716-749, 1997.
10. J. P. Murmann, Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institutions. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003.
11. U. Merry, "Organizational strategy on different landscapes: A new science approach," Systemic Practice and Action Research, vol. 12, pp. 257-278, 1999.
12. L. W. P. Pagie, "Information Integration in Evolutionary Processes," Dissertation thesis, Faculteit Biologie, Universiteit Utrecht, 1999.
13. F. W. Geels, "Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study," Research Policy, vol. 31, pp. 1257-1274, 2002.
14. R. R. Nelson, "The coevolution of technology and institutions as the driver of economic growth," in Frontiers of Evolutionary Economics: Competition, Self-Organization and Innovation Policy, J. Foster and J. S. Metcalfe, Ed. Cheltenham, UK: Edvard Elgar, 2001, pp. 19-30.
15. B. L. Bechtold, "Chaos theory as a model for strategy development," Empowerment in Organizations, vol. 5, pp. 193-201, 1997.