The value of endorectal MRI in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer

European Urology

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 201-208

  Comet Batlle, J ^a   Vilanova Busquets, J C ^a   Saladie Roig J M ^b   Gelabert Mas, A ^c   Barcelo Vidal C ^d   Spencer, J A ^e  

^a HOSPITAL JOSEP TRUETA   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARI GERMANS TRIAS I PUJOL   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL DEL MAR   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GIRONA   (Spain)

^e Campus Montilivi ^*

Author keywords

Early diagnosis; Endorectal MRI; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; ENDORECTAL NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; ROC CURVE; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 0042769317     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00248-3     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. M. Jensen J. Steve H. Moller H. Renard Cancer in the European Community and its member states Eur. J. Cancer 26 1990 1167 1256
2. W.J. Catalona J.P. Richie F.R. Ahmann M.A. Hudson P.T. Scardino R.C. Flanigan Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6.630 men J. Urol. 151 1994 1283 1290
3. T.H. Phillips I.M. Thompson Digital rectal examination and carcinoma of the prostate Urol. Clin. N. Amer. 18 1991 459 465
4. C. Obek P. Louis F. Civantos M. Soloway Comparación de los resultados de la exploración rectal digital y de la biopsia con la muestra de prostatectomia radical J. Urol. Ed. Esp. 6 1999 159 164
5. J.W. Colberg D.S. Smith W.J. Catalona Prevalence and pathological extent of prostate cancer in men with prostate specific antigen levels of 2.9 to 4.0 ng/ml J. Urol. 149 1993 507 509
6. T.J. Polascik J.E. Oesterling A.W. Partin Prostate specific antigen: a decade of discovery—what we have learned and where we are going J. Urol. 162 1999 293 306
7. P.L. Choyke Imaging prostate cancer Abdm. Imaging 20 1995 505 515
8. T. Stamey Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsies Urology 45 1995 2 12
9. R. Simak R. Eisenmenger A. Hainz C. Kratzik M. Marberger Is transrectal ultrasonography needed to rule out prostatic cancer with normal findings at digital rectal examination and normal serum prostate specific antigen? Eur. Urol. 24 1993 474 478
10. L.E. Quint J.S. Van Erp P.H. Bland S.H. Mandell E.A. Del Buono H.B. Grossman Carcinoma of the prostate: MR images obtained with body coils do not accurately reflect tumor volume Am. J. Roentgenol. 156 1991 511 516
11. F.G. Sommers H.V. Nghiem R. Herfkens J. McNeal R.N. Low Determining the volume of prostatic carcinoma: value of MR imaging with an external-array coil Am. J. Roentgenol. 161 1993 81 86
12. M.J. Chelsky M.D. Schnall Fast spin-echo MR images of the pelvis obtained with a phased-array coil: value in localising and staging prostatic carcinoma Am. J. Roentgenol. 161 1993 601 606
13. J.C. Presti Jr. H. Hricak P.A. Narayan K. Shinohara S. White P.R. Carroll Local staging of prostatic carcinoma: comparison of transrectal sonography and endorectal MR imaging Am. J. Roentgenol. 166 1996 103 108
14. M.L. Schiebler B.C. Yankaskas C. Tempany C.E. Spritzer M.D. Rifkin H.M. Pollack MR imaging in adenocarcinoma of the prostate: interobserver variation and efficacy for determining stage C disease Am. J. Roentgenol. 158 1992 559 562
15. M.L. Schiebler M.D. Schnall H.M. Pollack R.E. Lenkinski J.E. Tomaszewski A.J. Wein Current role of MR imaging in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the prostate Radiology 189 1993 339 352
16. H. Hricak S. White D. Vigneron J. Kurhanewicz A. Kosco D. Levin Carcinoma of the prostate gland: MR imaging with pelvic phased-array coils versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils Radiology 193 1994 703 709
17. M.J. Chelsky M.D. Schnall E.J. Siedmon H.M. Pollack Use of endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer J. Urol. 150 1993 391 395
18. H. Boni J.A. Boner J.F. Debatin F. Trinkler H. Knonagel A. Von Hochstetter Optimisation of prostate carcinoma staging: comparison of imaging and clinical methods Clin. Radiol. 50 1995 593 600
19. B. Djavan V. Ravery A. Zlotta P. Dobronski M. Dobrovits M. Fakhari Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected in biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop? J. Urol. 166 2001 1679 1683
20. J.C. Vilanova Busquets J. Comet Batlle A. Capdevila J. Barceló J.L. Dolz M. Huguet The value of endorectal MR imaging to predict positive biopsies in clinically intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients European Radiology 11 2001 229 235
21. H.B. Carter R. Brem C. Tempany A. Yang J.L. Epstein P.C. Walsh Non palpable prostate cancer: detection with MR imaging Radiology 178 1991 523 525
22. Kedar RP, Bridgeport MD, Kier R, Viner N, Patel KI, Choy OG. MR imaging as a screening examination for prostate cancer in high risk patients. Congress of the American Radiology Society. Chicago. 1998; p. 515.
23. M. Perrotti K.R. Han R.E. Epstein E.C. Kennedy F. Rabbani K. Badani Prospective evaluation of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging to detect tumor foci in men with prior negative prostatic biopsy: a pilot study J. Urol. 162 1999 1314 1317
24. M. Schnall Y. Imai J.J. Tomaszewski H.M. Pollack R.E. Lemkinski H.Y. Kressel Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging Radiology 178 1991 797 802
25. C.M. Tempany X. Zhou E.A. Zerhouni Staging of prostate cancer: results of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group project comparison of three MR imaging techniques Radiology 192 1994 47 54
26. J.E. Husband J.E. Padhani A.D. MacVicar P. Revell Magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: comparison of image quality using endorectal and pelvic phased array coils Clinical Radiology 53 1998 673 681