Valuation of aircraft noise by time of day: A comparison of two approaches

Transport Reviews

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 417-433

  Bristow, Abigail L ^a   Wardman, Mark ^b  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR TRANSPORTATION; AIRCRAFT; AIRPORT; TRANSPORTATION POLICY;

EID: 33744807779     PISSN: 01441647     EISSN: 14645327     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01441640600602096     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Arentze, T. and Borgers, A. and Timmermans, H. and DelMistro, R. (2003) Transport stated choice responses: Effects of task complexity, presentation format and literacy, Transportation Research E, 39, pp. 229-244.
2. Arsenio, E. and Bristow, A. L. and Wardman, M.(2000). Proceedings of Seminar F (Behavioural Modeling), European Transport Conference. 2000. In An innovative stated preference computer survey model for valuing noise impacts from road traffic [pp.].
3. Barreiro, J. and Sanchez, M. and Viladrich-Grau, M.(2000). Internoise 2000, the 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering. NiceFranceAugust, 27-30 2000. In How much people are willing to pay for silence? A one and one half bound DC CV estimate [pp.].
4. Bristow, A. L. and Wardman, M.(2003). Attitudes to Aircraft Annoyance Around Airports (5A) Survey Report, EEC/SEE/2003/002.. In Attitudes towards and values of aircraft annoyance and noise nuisance [pp.]. Available at:
5. Bristow, A. L. and Wardman, M.(2004). paper presented at envecon 2004 Applied Environmental Economics Conference. March 26 2004. In Using stated preference to value annoyance from aircraft: A comparison of approaches [pp.]. Available at:
6. Brown, N.(1996) Quality of life issues within an integrated transport strategy framework. In. Leeds: University of Leeds. PhD thesis
7. Carlsson, F. and Lampi, E. and Martinson, P. (2004) The marginal values of noise disturbance from air traffic: Does the time of day matter? Transportation Research D, 9, pp. 373-385.
8. Chapman, R. G. and Staelin, R. (1982) Exploiting rank-ordered choice set data within the stochastic utility model, Journal of Marketing Research, 19, pp. 288-301.
9. Department for Transport.(2003) The Future of Air Transport. London: TSO. Cm6046
10. European Parliament and Council.(2002a) Relating to the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise. Brussels: European Commission. Directive 2002/49/EC
11. European Parliament and Council.(2002b) On the Establishment of Rules and Procedures with Regard to the Introduction of Noise-related Operating Restrictions at Community Airports. Brussels: European Commission. Directive 2002/30/EC
12. Faburel, G. and Luchini, S.(2000). Internoise 2000, 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering. Nice France August 27-30 2000. In The social cost of aircraft noise: The contingent valuation methods applied to Paris-Orly Airport [pp.]..
13. Fietelson, E. I. and Hurd, R. E. and Mudge, R. R. (1996) The impact of airport noise on willingness to pay for residences, Transportation Research D, 1, pp. 1-14.
14. Hague Consulting Group.(2000) ALOGIT 4.0EC. The Hague: HCG.
15. Heaver, C.(2002) Attitudes to Aircraft Annoyance around Airports. (5A) Focus Group Report, EEC/ENV/2002/09. Available at:
16. Hoinville, G. (1971) Evaluating community preferences, Environment and Planning, 3, pp. 33-50.
17. Johnson, E. J. and Meyer, R. J. (1984) Compensatory choice models of noncompensatory processes: The effect of varying context, Journal of Consumer Research, 11, pp. 45-57.
18. Jones, P.(1997). Proceedings of Seminar D, PTRC European Transport Forum. LondonUK. In Addressing the 'packaging' problem in stated preference studies [pp.].
19. Malhotra, N. K. (1982) Structural reliability and stability of nonmetric conjoint analysis, Journal of Marketing Research, 19, pp. 199-207.
20. Miedema, H. M. E and Oudshoorn, C. G. M. (2001) Annoyance from transportation noise: Relationships with noise exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals, Environmental Health Perspectives, 109((4)), pp. 409-416.
21. MVA.(1985) Station Modernisation Priorities and Payoffs. Prepared for British Railways Board (London).
22. MVA.(1986) Evaluation of InterCity Rolling Stock Improvements. Prepared for British Railways Board (London).
23. MVA.(1993) Passenger Priorities Research Stage 1. Prepared for London Underground Ltd (London).
24. Navrud, S.(2000). Internoise 2000, 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering. Nice France August 27-30 2000. In Economic benefits of a programme to reduce transportation and community noise - a contingent valuation study [pp.].
25. Pommerehne, W. W.(1988) Measuring the environmental benefits: A comparison of hedonic technique and contingent valuation. In Welfare and Efficiency in Public Economics. (pp. 363-400). Berlin: Springer.
26. Thune-Larsen, H.(1995) Flystøyavgifter basert på betalingsvillighet. (English language summary report: Charges on Air Traffic Noise by Means of Conjoint Analysis). Report No. 289/1995 (TOI).
27. Timmermans, H. (1993) The impact of task complexity on information in multi-attribute decision making, Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 6, pp. 95-111.
28. Wardman, M. and Bristow, A. L. (2004) Noise and air quality valuations: evidence from stated preference residential choice models, Transportation Research D, 9((1)), pp. 1-27.
29. Widlert, S.(1998) Stated preference studies: The design affects the results. In Travel Behavior Research: Updating the State of Play. (pp. 105-123). Oxford: Pergamon.