Detecting glaucoma with RADAAR: The Bridlington Eye Assessment Project

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 90, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 744-748

  Hawker, M J ^a   Vernon, Stephen A ^a   Tattersall, C L ^a   Dua, H S ^a  

^a QUEEN S MEDICAL CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MALE; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIM DISC AREA ASYMMETRY RATIO; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX DIFFERENCE;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MALE; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; OPTIC DISK; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY; VISION SCREENING; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33744799686     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2005.082115     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Wolfs RC, Borger PH, Ramrattan RS, et al. Changing views on open-angle glaucoma: definitions and prevalences-the Rotterdam Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:3309-21.
2. Yablonski ME, Zimmerman TJ, Kass MA, et al. Prognostic significance of optic disk cupping in ocular hypertensive patients. Am J Ophthalmol 1980;89:585-92.
3. Harasymowycz P, Davis B, Xu G, et al. The use of RADAAR (ratio of rim area to disc area asymmetry) in detecting glaucoma and its severity. Can J Ophthalmol 2004;39:240-4.
4. Hawker MJ, Vernon SA, Ainsworth G, et al. Asymmetry in optic disc morphometry as measured by Heidelberg retina tomography in a normal elderly population: the Bridlington Eye Assessment Project. Invest Ophthalmol VisSc/2005;46:4153-8.
5. Hermann MM, Theofylaktopoulos I, Bangard N, et al. Optic nerve head morphometry in healthy adults using confocal laser scanning tomography. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:761-5.
6. Durukan AH, Yucel I, Akar Y, et al. Assessment of optic nerve head topographic parameters with a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2004;32:259-64.
7. Nakamuro H, Maeda T, Suzuki Y, et al. Scanning laser tomography to evaluate optic discs of normal eyes. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1999;43:410-4.
8. Vernon SA, Hawker MJ, Ainsworth G, et al. Laser scanning tomography of the optic nerve head in a normal elderly population: The Bridlington Eye Assessment Project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:2823-8.
9. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1557-63.
10. Miglior S, Albe E, Guareschi M, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of optic disc stereometric parameters by Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1072-7.
11. Garway-Heath DF, Poinoosawmy D, Wollstein G, et al. Inter- and intraobserver variation in the analysis of optic disc images: comparison of the Heidelberg retina tomograph and computer assisted planimetry, Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:664-9.
12. Saruhan A, Orgul S, Kocak I, et al. Descriptive information of topographic parameters computed at the optic nerve head with the Heidelberg retina tomograph. J Glaucoma 1998;7:420-9.
13. Ong LS, Mitchell P, Healey PR, et al. Asymmetry in optic disc parameters: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:849-57.
14. Budde WM, Jonas JB, Martus P, et al. Influence of optic disc size on neuroretinal rim shape in healthy eyes. J Glaucoma 2000;9:357-62.
15. Varma R, Steinmann WC, Scott IU. Expert agreement in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1992;99:215-21.
16. Azuara-Blanco A, Katz LJ, Spaem GL, et al. Clinical agreement among glaucoma experts in the detection of glaucomatous changes of the optic disk using simultaneous stereoscopic photographs. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:949-50.
17. Quigley HA, Enger C, Katz J, et al. Risk factors for the development of glaucomatous visual field loss in ocular hypertension. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:644-9.
18. Graham SL, Klistorner AI, Grigg JR, et al. Objective VEP perimetry in glaucoma: asymmetry analysis to identify early deficits. J Glaucoma 2000;9:10-9.
19. Zangwill L, Irak I, Berry CC, et al. Effect of cataract and pupil size on image quality with confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:983-90.
20. Sihota R, Gulati V, Agarwal HC, et al. Variables affecting test-retest variability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Il stereometric parameters. J Glaucoma 2002;11:321-8.
21. Guzowski M, Fraser-Bell S, Rochtchina E, et al. Asymmetric refraction in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:551-3.