Psychometric properties of an emotional adjustment computerized adaptive test;Propiedades psicométricas de un test adaptativo informatizado para la medición del ajuste emocional

Psicothema

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 484-491

  Aguado, David ^a,b   Rubio, Víctor J ^a   Hontangas, Pedro M ^c   Hernández, José Manuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b Inst de Ing del Conocimiento   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744795707     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aguado, D., Santa Cruz, C., Dorronsoro, J.R.D. y Rubio, V. J. (2000). Algoritmo mixto mínima entropía-máxima verosimilitud para la selección de ítems en un test adaptative informatizado. Psicothema, 12(2), pp. 12-14.
2. Avia, M.D. y Sánchez Bernardos, M.L. (1995). Personalidad: aspectos cognitivos y sociales. Madrid: Pirámide.
3. Baker, F.B. (1985). The basics of item response theory. Portsmouth, NH: Heinneman.
4. Baker, J.G., Rounds, J.B. y Zevon, M.A. (2000). A comparison of graded and Rasch partial credit models with subjetive well-being. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 253-270.
5. Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring a examinee's ability. En P.M. Lord y M. Novick (eds.): Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading Mass, Addison-Wesley.
6. Buss, A.H. y Plomin, R. (1975). A temperament theory of personality development. John Wiley and Sons. Traducción al castellano, Madrid: Marova 1980.
7. Caprara, G.V., Barbaranelli, L. y Borgogni, L. (1993). BFQ. Organizzazioni Specialle. Florencia (versión española, Madrid: TEA Ediciones, 1995).
8. Carmines, E.G. y Zeller, R.A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
9. Cattell, R.B. y Scheier, I.H. (1961). The meaning and measurement of neuroticism and anxiety. New York: Ronald Press.
10. Cattell, R.B. (1972). Sixteen Personality Factor. 16 Pf. Illinois: ITPA (versión española, Madrid: TEA Ediciones, 1975).
11. Chernyshenko, O.S., Stark, S., Chan, K.Y., Drasgow, F. y Williams, B. (2001). Fitting item response theory models to two personality inventories: issues and insights. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 523562.
12. Cooke, D.J. y Michie, C. (1997). An item response theory analysis of the Hare Psychopath Checklist-revised. Psychological Assessment 9, 3-14.
13. Costa, P.T. y McCrae, R.R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL.: Psychological Assessment Resources.
14. Costa, P.T. y McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, F.L.: Psychological Assessment Resources.
15. Digman, J.M. (1990). Personality structure: emergence of the five factor model. Annual Review of Psychology 41, 417-440.
16. Dodd, B.C., De Ayala, R.J. y Koch, W.R. (1995). Computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement 14, 59-71.
17. Eysenck, H.J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
18. Eysenck, H.J. y Eysenck, S.B.G. (1978). EPQ Cuestionario Je Personalidud. Formas Ay J. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
19. Ferrando, P.J. (1994). Fitting item response models to the EP1-A Impulsivity scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 118-127.
20. Ferrando, P.J. (2001). The measurement of neuroticism using MMQ, MPI, EPI and EPQ items: a psychometric analysis based on item response theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 641-656.
21. Flannery, W.P., Reise, S.P. y Widaman, K.F. (1995). An item response theory of the general and academic scales of the Self-Description Questionnaire II. Journal of Research in Personality 29, 168-188.
22. Goldberg, L.R. (1990). An alternative «description of personality»: the Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1.216-1.229.
23. Gray-Little, B., Williams, V.S.L. y Hancock, T.D. (1997). A item response theory analysis of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 443-451.
24. Guilford, J.P. (1959). Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25. Hambleton, R.K. (1990). Item response theroy: introduction and bibliography. Psicothema, 1, 97-107.
26. Hambleton, R.K. y Swaminathan, J. (1985). Item response theory: principles and aplications. Boston, M.A: Kluwer.
27. Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, J. y Rogers, H.J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
28. Horn, J.L. (1965). A rationale and technique for estimating the number of factor in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
29. King, D.W., King, L.A., Fairbank, J.A., Schiengar, E. y Surface, C.R. (1993). Enhancing the precision of the Mississippi scale for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder: an application of item response theory. Psychological Assessment, 5, 457-471.
30. Lord, F.M. (1952). A theory of tests scores. Psychometric Monographs, 7.
31. Lord, F.M. (1953). The relation of test score to the trait underlying the test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 13, 517-549.
32. Lord, F.M. (1970). Some test theory for tailored testing. En W.H. Holtzman (ed.): Computer asisisted instruction, testing and guidance (pp. 139-183). New York: Harper and Row.
33. Lord, F.M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, New Jersey: LEA.
34. Lord, F.M. y Novick, M.R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental tests scores. Reading, MA., Addison Wesley.
35. Martínez Arias, R. (1995). Teoría de los tests psicológicos y educativos. Madrid: Síntesis.
36. Masters, G.N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 49, 529-544.
37. Muraki, E. y Bock, R.D. (1996). Parscale 3.0. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
38. Muñiz, J. (1990). Teoría de la Respuesta a los ítems. Madrid: Pirámide.
39. Olea, J. y Ponsoda, V. (1996). Tests adaptatives informatizados. En J. Muñiz (coord.): Psicometría. (pp. 729-783). Madrid: Universitas.
40. Owen, R.J. (1975). A bayesian sequential procedure for quantal response in the context of adaptive mental testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 351-356.
41. Reckase, M.D. (1979). Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: results and implications. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4, 207-230.
42. Reise, S.P. y Henson, J.M. (2000). Computerization and adaptive administration of the NEO PI-R. Assessment, 7, 347-364.
43. Reise, S.P. y Henson, J.M. (2003). A discusion of modern versus traditional psychotnetrics as applied to personality assessment scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 93-104.
44. Reise, S.P. y Waller, N.G. (1990). Fitting the two-parameter model to personality data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 45-58.
45. Robie, C., Zickar, M.J. y Schmit, M.J. (2001). Measurement equivalence between applicant and incumbent groups: an IRT analysis of personality scales. Human Performance, 14, 187-207.
46. Rojas, A.J. (2001). Pasado, presente y future de los tests adaptativos informatizados: entrevista con Isaac I. Bejar. Psicothema, 13, 685-690.
47. Rouse, S.V., Finger, M.S. y Butcher, J.N. (1999). Advances in clinical personality measurement: an item response theory analysis of the MMPI-2 PSY-5 scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 72, 282-307.
48. Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scored. Psychometrika Monograph, 17.
49. Samejima, F. (1997). Graded response model. En W.J. Van der Linden y R.K. Hambleton (eds.): Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
50. Van der Linden, W.J. y Hambleton, R.K. (eds.) (1997). Handbook of modem item response theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
51. Zumbo, B., Pope, G.A., Watson, J.E. y Hubley, A.M. (1997). An empirical test of Roskam's conjecture about the interpretation of an ICC parameter in personality inventories. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 963-969.