Past, present and future of Computerized Adaptive Testing: Interview with Isaac I. Bejar;Pasado, presente y futuro de los Tests Adaptativos Informatizados: Entrevista con Isaac I. Bejar

Psicothema

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 685-690

  Tejada, Antonio J Rojas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALMERÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346490507     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Aguado, D., Santa Cruz, C., Dorronsoro, J.R. y Rubio, V.J. (2000). Algoritmo mixto mínima entropía-máxima información para la selección de ítems en un test adaptativo informatizado. Psicothema, vol. 12(Supl. no2), 12-14.
2. Almond, R.G. y Mislevy, R.J. (1999). Graphical models and computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23(3), 223-237.
3. Bennett, R.E. (1998). Reinventing Assessment: speculations on the Future of Large-Scale Educational Assessment. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
4. Bennett, R. (1999). ETS Scientist Awards Announced. News Alert, Vol.1, N0.7.
5. Bejar, I.I. (1983). Achievement testing: recent advances. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6. Bejar, I.I. (1991). A methodology for scoring open-ended architectural design problems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 522-532.
7. Bejar, I.I. (1993). A generative approach to psychological and educational measurement. En N. Frederiksen, R.J. Mislevy e I.I. Bejar (Eds.). Test theory for a new generation of tests. pp. 323-358. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
8. Bejar, I.I. (1995). From adaptive testing to automated scoring of architectural simulations. En E.L. Mancall y P.G. Bashook (Eds.). Assessing clinical reasoning: the oral examination and alternative methods. Evanston, IL: American Board of Medical Specialties.
9. Bejar, I.I. y Bennett, R. E. (1999). La puntuación de las respuestas como un parámetro del diseño de exámenes: implicaciones en la validez. En J. Olea, V. Ponsoda y G. Prieto, (Eds.). Tests informatizados. Madrid: Pirámide.
10. Bejar, I.I. y Yocom, P. (1991). A generative aprproach to the modeling of isomorphic hidden figure items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15(2), 129-137.
11. College Board (2000). ACCUPLACER™. [On Line]. Obtenido 10/02/2000 en URL: http://www.collegeboard.org/accuplacer/html/accupla1.html
12. LaDuca, A., Templeton, B., Holzman, G. B., Staples, W. I. (1986). ítemmodelling procedure for constructing content-equivalent multiple choice questions. Medical education, 20, 53-56.
13. Linn, R. L. (1990). Has ítem response theory increased the validity of achievement test scores? Applied Measurement in Education, 3(2), 115-141.
14. Lord, F.M. (1971a). The self-scoring flexible test. Journal of Educational Measurement, Vol. 8(3), 147-151.
15. Lord, F.M. (1971b). Robbins-Monro procedures for Tailored Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol.31, 3-31.
16. Lord, F.M. (1971c). The Theoretical Study of the Measurement Effectiveness of Flexilevel Tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol.31, 805-813.
17. Olea, J., Ponsoda, V. y Prieto, G. (Eds.). (1999). Tests informatizados. Madrid: Pirámide.
18. Reckase, M.D. (1989). Adaptative Testing: The evolution of a good idea. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 8, 11-15.
19. Revuelta, J. (2000). Estimación de habilidad mediante isomorfos. Efectos en la fiabilidad de las puntuaciones. Psicothema, vol. 12(2), 303-307.
20. Revuelta, J. y Ponsoda, V. (1998). Un test adaptativo informatizado de análisis lógico basado en la generación automática de ítems. Psicothema, vol. 10(3), 753-760.
21. Simon, H. A., & Hayes, J. R. (1976). The understanding process: Problem isomorphs. Cognitive Psychology, 8(2), 165-190.
22. Ward, W.C. (1984). Using microcomputers to administer tests. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 3, 16-20.
23. Weiss, D.J. (1985). Adaptative Testing by Computer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 53, 774-789.