Remarks on nominal grounding

Functions of Language

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 77-113

  Langacker, Ronald W ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UCSD Linguistics   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744790787     PISSN: 0929998X     EISSN: 15699765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/fol.11.1.05lan     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ariel, Mira. 1988. Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 24: 65-87.
2. Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 577-660.
3. Brisard, Frank (ed.) 2002. Grounding: The Epistemic Footing of Deixis and Reference. (Cognitive Linguistics Research, 21). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
4. Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, Function, and Grammaticalization. (Typological Studies in Language, 42). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
5. Dixon, R. M. W. 2003. Demonstratives: A cross-linguistic typology. Studies in Language 27: 61-112.
6. Epstein, Richard. 2001. The definite article, accessibility, and the construction of discourse referents. Cognitive Linguistics 12: 333-378.
7. Epstein, Richard. 2002. Grounding, subjectivity and definite descriptions. In Brisard, 41-82.
8. Fauconnier, Gilles. 1985. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Fauconnier, Gilles. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Fauconnier, Gilles, and Eve Sweetser (eds.) 1996. Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
12. Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg, and Ron Zacharski. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69: 274-307.
13. Hankamer, Jorge, and Ivan Sag. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 391-428.
14. Hawkins, John. 1978. Definiteness and Indefiniteness: A Study in Reference and Grammatically Prediction. London: Croom Helm.
15. Hudson, Richard A. 1987. Zwicky on heads. Journal of Linguistics 23: 109-132.
16. Hudson, Richard A. 1992. Review of Ronald W. Langacker, Concept, Image, and Symbol. Journal of Linguistics 28: 506-509.
17. Janssen, Theo A. J. M. 1995. Deixis from a cognitive point of view. In Ellen Contini-Morava and Barbara Sussman Goldberg (eds.), Meaning as Explanation: Advances in Linguistic Sign Theory. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 245-270.
18. Kirsner, Robert S. 1993. From meaning to message in two theories: Cognitive and Saussurean views of the Modern Dutch demonstratives. In Richard A. Geiger and Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds.), Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language. (Cognitive Linguistics Research, 3). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 81-114.
19. Langacker, Ronald W. 1987a. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
20. Langacker, Ronald W. 1987b. Nouns and verbs. Language 63: 53-94.
21. Langacker, Ronald W. 1988. Autonomy, agreement, and cognitive grammar. In Diane Brentari, Gary Larson, and Lynn MacLeod (eds.), Agreement in Grammatical Theory. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 147-180.
22. Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2, Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
23. Langacker, Ronald W. 1993. Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 4: 1-38.
24. Langacker, Ronald W. 1995. Possession and possessive constructions. In John R. Taylor and Robert E. MacLaury (eds.), Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World (Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs, 82). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 51-79.
25. Langacker, Ronald W. 1997a. A dynamic account of grammatical function. In Joan Bybee, John Haiman, and Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Type Dedicated to T. Givón. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 249-273.
26. Langacker, Ronald W. 1997b. Generics and habituals. In Angeliki Athanasiadou and René Dirven (eds.), On Conditionals Again. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 143). 191-222. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
27. Langacker, Ronald W. 1998. Indeterminacy in semantics and grammar. In José Luis Cifuentes Honrubia (ed.), Estudios de Lingüística Cognitiva II. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante, Departamento de Filología Española, Lingüística General y Teoría de la Literatura. 649-672.
28. Langacker, Ronald W. 1999a. Virtual reality. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 29. 2: 77-103.
29. Langacker, Ronald W. 1999b. Losing control: Grammaticization, subjectification, and transparency. In Andreas Blank and Peter Koch (eds.), Historical Semantics and Cognition. (Cognitive Linguistics Research, 13). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 147-175.
30. Langacker, Ronald W. 2000. A dynamic usage-based model. In Michael Barlow and Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-Based Models of Language. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 1-63.
31. Langacker, Ronald W. 2001a. Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12: 143-188.
32. Langacker, Ronald W. 2001b. Dynamicity in grammar. Axiomathes 12: 7-33.
33. Langacker, Ronald W. 2001c. The English present tense. English Language and Linguistics 5: 251-271.
34. Langacker, Ronald W. 2001d. Viewing and experiential reporting in cognitive grammar. In Augusto Soares da Silva (ed.), Linguagem e Cognição: A Perspectiva da Linguística Cognitiva. Braga: Associação Portuguesa de Linguística and Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculdade de Filosofia de Braga. 19-49.
35. Langacker, Ronald W. 2002a. Deixis and subjectivity. In Brisard, 1-28.
36. Langacker, Ronald W. 2003a. Dynamicity, fictivity, and scanning: The imaginative basis of logic and linguistic meaning. Korean Linguistics 18: 1-64.
37. Langacker, Ronald W. 2003c. Context, cognition, and semantics: A unified dynamic approach. In Ellen van Wolde (ed.), Job 28: Cognition in Context. (Biblical Interpretation Series, 64). Leiden: Brill. 179-230.
38. Langacker, Ronald W. To appear. Aspects of the grammar of finite clauses.
39. Matsumoto, Yo. 1996a. How abstract is subjective motion? A comparison of coverage path expressions and access path expressions. In Adele E. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 359-373.
40. Matsumoto, Yo. 1996b. Subjective-change expressions in Japanese and their cognitive and linguistic bases. In Fauconnier and Sweetser, 124-156.
41. Mortelmans, Tanja. 2002."Wieso sollte ich dich küssen, du hässlicher Mensch!" A study of the German modals sollen and müssen as "grounding predications" in interrogatives.' In Brisard, 391-432.
42. Nuyts, Jan. 2002. Grounding and the system of epistemic expressions in Dutch: A cognitive-functional view. In Brisard, 433-466.
43. Pelyvás, Péter. 1996. Subjectivity in English: Generative Grammar Versus the Cognitive Theory of Epistemic Grounding. (MetaLinguistica, 3). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
44. Talmy, Leonard. 1996. Fictive motion in language and "ception". In Paul Bloom et al. (eds.), Language and Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 211-276.
45. van Hoek, Karen. 1995. Conceptual reference points: A cognitive grammar account of pronominal anaphora constraints. Language 71: 310-340.
46. van Hoek, Karen. 1997a. Anaphora and Conceptual Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
47. van Hoek, Karen. 1997b. Backwards anaphora as a constructional category. Functions of Language 4: 47-82.
48. Van Langendonck, Willy. 1993. Towards a cognitive dependency grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 4: 311-329.
49. Van Langendonck, Willy. 1994. Determiners as heads? Cognitive Linguistics 5: 243-259.
50. Verhagen, Arie. 1986. Linguistic Theory and the Function of Word Order in Dutch: A Study on Interpretive Aspects of the Order of Adverbials and Noun Phrases. Dordrecht: Foris.
51. Wierzbicka, Anna. 1985. Oats and wheat: The fallacy of arbitrariness. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 311-342.
52. Zwicky Arnold M. 1985. Heads. Journal of Linguistics 21: 1-29.