Grounding, subjectivity and definite descriptions

Grounding: The Epistemic Footing of Deixis and Reference

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 41-82

  Epstein, Richard ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84969686297     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Abbott, Barbara 1999 Support for a unique theory of definiteness. In: Tanya Matthews and Devon Strolovitch (eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory IX, 1-15. Ithaca: Cornell University
2. Ariel, Mira 1988 Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 24: 65-87
3. Ariel, Mira 1990 Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge
4. Barwise, Jon and Robin Cooper 1981 Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy A: 159-219
5. Barwise, Jon and John Perry 1983 Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
6. Birner, Betty and Gregory Ward 1994 Uniqueness, familiarity, and the definite article in English. In: Susanne Gahl, Andy Dolbey and Christopher Johnson (eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 93-102. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society
7. Brisard, Frank this vol. The English present
8. Chafe, Wallace L. 1976 Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In: Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, 25-55. New York: Academic
9. Chafe, Wallace L 1994 Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
10. Chesterman, Andrew 1991 On Definiteness: A Study with Special Reference to English and Finnish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
11. Christophersen, Paul 1939 The Articles: A Study of Their Theory and Use in English. Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard
12. Clark, Herbert H. and Catherine R. Marshall 1981 Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In: Aravind K. Joshi, Bonnie L. Webber and Ivan A. Sag (eds.), Elements of Discourse Understanding, 10-63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
13. Declerck, Renaat 1986 Two notes on the theory of definiteness. Journal of Linguistics 22: 25-39
14. De Mulder, Walter 2000 Accessibility vs. presence: Demonstrative determiners, definite articles, and grounding. Paper presented at the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, Budapest
15. Du Bois, John W. 1980 Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse. In: Wallace L. Chafe (ed.), The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production, 203-274. Norwood: Ablex
16. Epstein, Richard 1993 The definite article: Early stages of development. In: Jaap van Marie (ed.), Historical Linguistics 1991: Papers from the 10th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 111-134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
17. Epstein, Richard 1995 L'article dEpstein, Richard éfini en ancien français: L'expression de la subjectivité. Langue française 107: 58-71
18. Epstein, Richard 1996 Viewpoint and the definite article. In: Adele E. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, 99-112. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information
19. Epstein, Richard 1998 Reference and definite referring expressions. Pragmatics and Cognition 6: 189-207
20. Epstein, Richard 2000 A definite article in Kumeyaay. Unpublished manuscript. forthcom. The definite article, accessibility, and the construction of discourse referents. Cognitive Linguistics
21. Fauconnier, Gilles 1994 Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
22. Fauconnier, Gilles 1997 Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
23. Givón, Talmy 1983 Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In: Talmy Givón (ed.), Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study, 5-41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
24. Fauconnier, Gilles 1984 Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, Volume 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
25. Fauconnier, Gilles 1992 The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions. Linguistics 30: 5-55
26. Gundel, Jeanette K, Nancy Hedberg and Ron Zacharski 1993 Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69: 274-307
27. Halliday, M.A.K, and Ruqaiya Hasan 1976 Cohesion in English. London: Longman
28. Hanks, William F. 1992 The indexical ground of deictic reference. In: Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context, 43-76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
29. Hawkins, John A. 1978 Definiteness and Indefiniteness: A Study in Reference and Grammaticality Prediction. London: Croom Helm
30. Hawkins, John A 1991 On (in)definite articles: Implicatures and (un)grammaticality prediction. Journal of Linguistics 27: 405-442
31. Heim, Irene R. 1982 The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
32. Hintikka, Jaakko and Jack Kulas 1985 Anaphora and Definite Descriptions: Two Applications of Game-Theoretical Semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel
33. Kadmon, Nirit 1990 Uniqueness. Linguistics and Philosophy 13: 273-324
34. Kempson, Ruth 1986 Definite NPs and context dependence: A unified theory of anaphora. In: Terry Myers, Keith Brown and Brendan McGonigle (eds.), Reasoning and Discourse Processes, 209-239. London: Academic
35. Kleiber, Georges 1992 Article défini, unicité et pertinence. Revue Romane 27: 61-89
36. Lambrecht, Knud 1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
37. Langacker, Ronald W. 1985 Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In: John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax, 109-150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
38. Langacker, Ronald W 1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press
39. Langacker, Ronald W this vol. a Deixis and subjectivity
40. Langacker, Ronald W this vol. b Remarks on the English grounding systems
41. Laury, Ritva this vol. Interaction, grounding and third-person referential forms
42. Löbner, Sebastian 1985 Definites. Journal of Semantics 4: 279-326
43. Lyons, Christopher 1999 Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
44. Nuyts, Jan this vol. Grounding and the system of epistemic expressions in Dutch: A cognitive-functional view
45. Ojeda, Almerindo E. 1991 Definite descriptions and definite generics. Linguistics and Philosophy 14: 367-397
46. Prince, Ellen F. 1981 Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In: Peter Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, 223-255. New York: Academic
47. Russell, Bertrand 1905 On denoting. Mind 14: 479-93
48. Schnedecker, Catherine, Michel Charolles, Georges Kleiber and Jean David (eds.) 1994 L'anaphore associative: Aspects linguistiques, psycholinguistiques et automatiques. Paris: Klincksieck
49. Searle, John R. 1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
50. Silverstein, Michael 1976 Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In: Keith H. Basso and Henry A. Selby (eds.), Meaning in Anthropology, 11-55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press
51. Silverstein, Michael 1977 Cultural prerequisites to grammatical analysis. In: Muriel Saville-Troika (ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics
52. Silverstein, Michael 1977: Linguistics and Anthropology, 139-151. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press
53. Silverstein, Michael 1979 Language structure and linguistic ideology. In: Paul R. Clyne, William F. Hanks and Carol L. Hofbauer (eds.), The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels, 193-247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society
54. Silverstein, Michael 1981 The limits of awareness. (Sociolinguistic working paper 84.) Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory
55. Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson 1986 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
56. Stanzel, Franz K. 1981 Teller-characters and reflector-characters in narrative theory. Poetics Today 2: 5-15