Condition monitoring in UK defence - The challenges ahead

International Journal of COMADEM

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 2-8

  Hawkins, Fergus ^a  

^a TES Reliability and Maintenance Group   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Availability; Condition Monitoring; Defence; HUMS; Mission Reliability; Prognostics

Indexed keywords

CONDITION MONITORING TECHNOLOGY; LOGISTIC PROCESSES;

AVAILABILITY; CONDITION MONITORING; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; LOGISTICS; MILITARY COMMUNICATIONS; MILITARY EQUIPMENT; PUBLIC POLICY;

MILITARY ENGINEERING;

EID: 33744789724     PISSN: 13637681     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Einstein, A. Quoted in Neely, A (2002) Business Performance Measurement: Theory and Practice. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.
2. Cook J, Gourlay J & Boardman L. Contrasting Approaches to the Validation of Helicopter HUMS A Military User's Perspective. (2004) IEEE Aerospace Conference 2004 Proceedings.
3. O'Connor P D T. (2002). Practical Reliability Engineering 4th Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England, p 336. ISBN 0-470-84463-9.
4. Bryan L W, Woodford Dr S. (2003). Impact of Alternative Assumptions on Operational Effectiveness and Whole Life Cost of Maintenance-Free Operating Periods. QinetiQ. pp vi-vii. (Restricted).
5. O'Connor P D T. (2001 ). Test Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England. pp44 148. ISBN 0-471-49882-3.
6. Reliability Analysis Center (1996). Reliability Toolkit: Commercial Practices Edition. Rome Laboratories. Rome, New York State. USA. Appendix H. P429.
7. Civil Aviation Authority "Air Navigation Order". Schedule 4, 1989.
8. Pecht M. (2004). Prognostics Applied to Electronic Systems. Proceedings 2004 IEEE Aerospace Conference.
9. McMillan J R (2002). Preliminary Review of Prognostics Potential for UK Military Aerosystems. QinetiQ. pp vi-vii. (Restricted)