Contrasting approaches to the validation of helicopter HUMS - A military user's perspective

IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings

Volumn 6, Issue , 2004, Pages 3748-3755

  Cook, Jonathan ^a   Gourlay, Commander James ^b   Boardman, Squadron Leader Lawrie ^c  

^a Aircraft Health Monitoring Group   (United Kingdom)

^b HUMS Integrated Project Team   (United Kingdom)

^c Merlin Support Systems 2   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLIGHT CONTROL; HEALTH AND USAGE MONITORING SYSTEMS (HUMS); MERLIN SYSTEMS; PILOT INTERFACES;

AIRCRAFT; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CONTROL SYSTEMS; FLIGHT DYNAMICS; MONITORING; PERSONNEL; SENSORS;

HELICOPTERS;

EID: 11244290153     PISSN: 1095323X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/AERO.2004.1368193     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Civil Aviation Authority "Air Navigation Order", Schedule 4, 1989
2. CAP 693 "Acceptable means of compliance helicopter health monitoring CAA AAD 001-05-99", 01 May 1999 http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP693.pdf
3. UK MOD Joint Air Publication (JAP(D) 100A-01) Issue 5, Chapter 11.2, "Health and Usage Monitoring", April 2003
4. UK MOD Defence Standard 00-55 "Requirements for Safety Related Software in Defence Equipment", 01 August 1997 http://www.dstan.mod.uk/data/00/055/01000200.pdf
5. RTCA/DO-178B, "Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification", RTCA Inc., December 1, 1992.
6. RTCA/DO-248B, "Final Report for Clarification of DO-178B Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification", RTCA, Inc., October 12, 2001.
7. Stewart Hughes Ltd "1137 UK MOD Chinook HUMS Project Definition Study Summary Report", 1994