Socially strategic ecological restoration: A game-theoretic analysis shortened: Socially strategic restoration

Environmental Management

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 48-61

  Buckley, Mark ^a   Haddad, Brent M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Agriculture; Conflict; Cooperation; Game theory; Landowners; Restoration; Sacramento River

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; FARMS; GAME THEORY; GEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS; LANDSLIDES; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; RESTORATION;

CONFLICT; COOPERATION; LANDOWNERS; SACRAMENTO RIVER;

ECOSYSTEMS;

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION; GAME THEORY; LAND USE CONFLICT;

AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; GEOGRAPHY; LANDSCAPE; RIPARIAN ECOSYSTEM; RIVER; SOCIAL ASPECT; UNITED STATES;

AGRICULTURE; CALIFORNIA; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; GAME THEORY; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SOCIAL PLANNING;

AGRICULTURE; ECOSYSTEMS; RESTORATION;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; SACRAMENTO RIVER; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33744753803     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: 14321009     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-005-0165-7     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bergmann, S., and J. Bliss. 2004. Foundations of cross-boundary cooperation: resource management at the public-private interface. Society and Natural Resources 17:377-393.
2. Campbell, K. 2002. Sacramento River conservation area is scaled back. Accessed 5/2003. 〈http://www.cfbf.com/agalert/2002/aa-030602b.htm〉. Last updated 3/6/2002.
3. Conover, M. R. 1998. Perceptions of American agricultural producers about wildlife on their farms and ranches. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26:597-604.
4. Costanza, R., R. d'Arge, R. De Groot, S. Farberk, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R. V. O'Neill, J. Paruelo, R. G. Raskin, P. Sutton, and M. Van den Belt. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253-260.
5. Crawford, V., and J. Sobel. 1982. Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50:1431-1451.
6. Dailey, G. 1997. Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Covelo, California.
7. Family Water Alliance. 2002. 〈www.familywateralliance.com〉. Updated 3/2002. Accessed 9/2002.
8. Goodwin, C. N., C. P. Hawkins, and J. L. Kershner. 1997. Riparian restoration in the western United States: overview and perspective. Restoration Ecology 5:4-14.
9. Harsanyi, J. 1968. Part II: Bayesian equilibrium points. Management Science 14:320-334.
10. Howarth, R. B., and S. Farber. 2002. Accounting for the value of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 41:421-429.
11. Hughes, F., W. Adams, E. Muller, C. Nilsson, K. Richards, N. Barsoum, H. Decamps, R. Foussadier, J. Girel, H. Guiolloy, A. Hayes, M. Johansson, L. Lams, G. Pautou, J. Peiry, M. Perrow, F. Vautier, and M. Winfield. 2001. The importance of different scale processes for the restoration of floodplain woodlands. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 17:325-345.
12. Hyman, J., and S. Leibowitz. 2000. A general framework for prioritizing land units for ecological protection and restoration. Environmental Management 25:23-35.
13. Janofsky, M. 2000. U.S. takes blame in Los Alamos fire, which still burns. New York Times; 5/19/2000.
14. Kirk, D. A., M. L. Evenden, and P. Mineau. 1996. Past and current attempts to evaluate the role of birds as predators of insect pests in temperate agriculture. Current Ornithology 13:175-269.
15. Kremen, C., N. M. Williams, and R. W. Thorp. 2002. Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99:16812-16816.
16. Lauter, D., and L. Sahagun. 1993. Clinton asks flood aid of $2.5 billion disaster. Los Angeles Times; 7/15/1993.
17. Leach, W., and N. Pelkey. 2001. Making watershed partnerships work: a review of the empirical literature. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 127: 378-385.
18. Leach, W., N. Pelkey, and P. Sabatier. 2002. Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21:645-670.
19. Mciver, J., and L. Starr. 2001. Restoration of degraded lands in the interior Columbia River basin: passive vs. active approaches. Forest Ecology and Management 153:15-28.
20. Naiman, R., K. Fetherston, S. Mckay, and J. Chen. 2001. Riparian forests. Pages 289-323 in R. Naiman and R. Bilby (eds.), River ecology and management. Springer, New York.
21. Nash, J. 1950. The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18:155-162.
22. Nash, J. 1951. Noncooperative games. Annals of Mathematics 54:286-295.
23. National Research Council. 1992. Restoration of aquatic ecosystems. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
24. Olsson, P., C. Folke, and F. Berkes. 2004. Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management 34:75-90.
25. Palmer, M. A., E. S. Bernhardt, J. D. Allan, P. S. Lake, G. Alexander, S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C. N. Dahm, J. Follstad Shah, D. L. Galat, S. G. Loss, P. Goodwin, D. D. Hart, B. Hassett, R. Jenkinson, G. M. Kondolf, R. Lave, J. L. Meyer, T. K. O'Donnell, L. Pagano, and E. Sudduth. 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:208-217.
26. Rickenbach, M., and A. Reed. 2002. Cross-boundary cooperation in a watershed context: the sentiments of private forest landowners. Environmental Management 30:584-594.
27. Sacramento River Advisory Council (SRAC). 1998. Sacramento River Conservation Area handbook. Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, California.
28. Sacramento River Conservation Area Forum (SRCAF). 2002. Meeting notes. 〈www.sacramentoriver.ca.gov〉. Last updated 8/2002. Accessed 10/2002.
29. Selten, R. 1965. Spieltheoretische behandlung eines oligopolmodells mitnachfragetragheit. Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Dtaatrwissenschaft 121:301-324.
30. Society for Ecological Restoration. 2002. The SER primer on ecological restoration. 〈http://ser.org/reading.php?Pg=primer2〉. Accessed 7/2003.
31. The Nature Conservancy (TNC). 2002. 〈www.sacrivermt.org〉 Updated 1/2002, Accessed 8/2002.
32. Ward, J., K. Tockner, U. Uehlinger, and F. Malard. 2001. Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restoration. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 17:311-323.
33. Webler, T., S. Tuler, and R. Krueger. 2001. What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environmental Management 27:435-450.
34. Wolf, K. 2002. Advancing wildlife restoration and compatible farming along the Sacramento River - Final report. The Nature Conservancy (May 21 2002 draft), Chico, California.
35. Woolley, J., and M. Mcginnis. 2000. The conflicting discourses of restoration. Society and Natural Resources 13:339-357.