Altitudinal genetic variation among Pinus oocarpa populations in Michoacán, Mexico. Implications for seed zoning, conservation, tree breeding and global warming

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 229, Issue 1-3, 2006, Pages 340-350

  Sáenz Romero, Cuauhtémoc ^a   Guzmán Reyna, R Ricardo ^a   Rehfeldt, Gerald E ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD MICHOACANA DE SAN NICOLÁS DE HIDALGO   (Mexico)

^b ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Altitudinal genetic variation; Conservation; Global warming; Mexico; Pinus oocarpa; Provenances; Seed zoning; Tree breeding

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; ECOLOGY; GLOBAL WARMING; SEED;

ALTITUDINAL GENETIC VARIATION; MEXICO; PINUS OOCARPA; PROVENANCES; SEED ZONING; TREE BREEDING;

FORESTRY;

ALTITUDINAL ZONATION; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; GENETIC VARIATION; GLOBAL WARMING; PLANT BREEDING;

CONSERVATION; ECOLOGY; FORESTRY; METEOROLOGY; SEEDS;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; MICHOACAN; NORTH AMERICA;

PERSEA; PERSEA AMERICANA; PINUS OOCARPA;

EID: 33744742668     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.04.014     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Asociación Agrícola Local de Productores de Aguacate de Uruapan Michoacán (AALPAUM), 2005. Producción del aguacate. http://www.aproam.com/CULTIVO/produccion.htm.
2. Campbell R.K. Genecology of Douglas-fir in a watershed in the Oregon Cascades. Ecology 60 (1979) 1036-1050
3. Comisión Forestal del Estado de Michoacán (COFOM). Atlas Forestal del Estado de Michoacán (2001), COFOM, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico
4. Comisión Forestal del Estado de Michoacán (COFOM). Informe Técnico de Ejecución para la Instrumentación en el Estado de Michoacán del Programa Nacional de Reforestación PRONARE (2002), COFOM, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico
5. Comisión Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR), 2005. Metas del Programa Nacional de Reforestación. http://www.conafor.gob.mx/programas_nacionales_forestales/pronare/index. html.
6. Dvorak W.S., Gutiérrez E.A., Osorio L.F., Hodge G.R., and Brawner J.T. Pinus oocarpa. In: Central America México Coniferous Resource Cooperative (CAMCORE) (Ed). Conservation and Testing of Tropical and Subtropical Forest Tree Species by the CAMCORE Cooperative (2000), College of Natural Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 129-147
7. Farjon A., and Styles B.T. Pinus (Pinaceae). Flora Neotropica Monograph 75 (1997), New York Botanical Garden, New York
8. Flato G.M., and Boer G.J. Warming asymmetry in climate change simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28 (2001) 195-198
9. Gordon C., Cooper C., Senior C.A., Banks H., Gregory J.M., Johns T.C., Mitchell J.F.B., and Wood R.A. The simulation of SST, sea-ice extents and ocean heat transport in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments. Climate Dyn. 16 (2000) 147-168
10. Greaves A. Pinus oocarpa. Forestry Abstracts 43 (1982) 503-532
11. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. In: Houghton J.T., Ding Y., Griggs D.J., Noguer M., van der Linden P.J., Dai X., Maskell K., and Johnson C.A. (Eds). Contributions of Working Group 1 to the Second Assessment Report of IPCC (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
12. Isik F., Keskin S., and McKeand S.E. Provenance variation and provenance-site interaction in Pinus brutia Ten.: consequences of defining breeding zones. Silvae Genetica 49 (2000) 213-223
13. Ledig F.T. The conservation of diversity in forest trees. Bioscience 38 (1988) 471-478
14. Ledig F.T. A comprehensive strategy for the conservation of forest genetic resources. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on the Development of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection (1992), Institute of Natural Resources and Environment, Korea University, Seoul, Korea, October 13-18 325-344
15. Mátyás C., and Yeatman C.W. Effect of geographical transfer on growth and survival of jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) populations. Silvae Genetica 41 (1992) 370-376
16. Mendizábal-Hernández L., Alba-Landa J., and Rebolledo-Camacho V. Pruebas de procedencia/progenie de Pinus oocarpa Schiede en el estado de Veracruz, México. Foresta Veracruzana 1 (1999) 9-12
17. Millar C.I., and Libby W.J. Strategies for conserving clinal, ecotypic, and disjunct population diversity in widespread species. In: Falk D.A., and Holsinger K.E. (Eds). Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants (1991), Oxford University Press, New York 149-172
18. Perry J.P. The Pines of Mexico and Central America (1991), Timber Press, Portland, OR
19. Rehfeldt G.E. Ecological genetics of Pinus contorta from the Rocky Mountains (USA): a synthesis. Silvae Genetica 37 (1988) 131-135
20. Rehfeldt G.E. Ecological adaptations in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca): a synthesis. For. Ecol. Manage. 28 (1989) 203-215
21. Rehfeldt G.E. A model of genetic variation for Pinus ponderosa in the Inland Northwest (USA): applications in gene resource management. Can. J. For. Res. 21 (1991) 1491-1500
22. Rehfeldt G.E. Genetic variation in the Ponderosae of the southwest. Am. J. Bot. 80 (1993) 330-343
23. Rehfeldt G.E. Adaptation of Picea engelmannii populations to the heterogeneous environments of the Intermountain West. Can. J. Bot. 72 (1994) 1197-1208
24. Rehfeldt, G.E., 2006. A spline climate model for western United States. General Technical Report 165, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO, 21 p.
25. Rehfeldt G.E., Tchebakova N.M., and Barnhardt L.K. Efficacy of climate transfer functions: introduction of Eurasian populations of Larix into Alberta. Can. J. For. Res. 29 (1999) 1660-1668
26. Rehfeldt G.E., Ying C.C., Spittlehouse D.L., and Hamilton Jr. D.A. Genetic responses to climate in Pinus contorta: niche breath, climate change, and reforestation. Ecol. Monogr. 69 (1999) 375-407
27. Rehfeldt G.E., Tchebakova N.M., Milyutin L.I., Parfenova E.I., Wykoff W.R., and Kouzmina N.A. Assessing population responses to climate in Pinus sylvestris and Larix spp. of Eurasia with climate-transfer models. Eurasian J. Forestry 6 (2003) 83-98
28. Rehfeldt G.E., Tchebakova N.M., and Parfenova E. Genetic responses to climate and climate change in conifers of the temperate and boreal forests. Recent Res. Dev. Genet. Breeding 1 (2004) 113-130
29. Rice K.J., and Emery N.C. Managing microevolution: restoration in the face of global change. Ecol. Environ. 1 (2003) 469-478
30. Sáenz-Romero C., Snively A., and Lindig-Cisneros R. Conservation and restoration of pine forest genetic resources in Mexico. Silvae Genetica 52 (2003) 233-237
31. Sáenz-Romero C., and Tapia-Olivares B.L. Pinus oocarpa isoenzymatic variation along an altitudinal gradient in Michoacán, Mexico. Silvae Genetica 52 (2003) 237-240
32. Sáenz-Romero C., and Lindig-Cisneros R. Evaluación y propuestas para el programa de reforestación en Michoacán, Mexico. Ciencia Nicolaíta 37 (2004) 107-122
33. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT User's Guide; Release 6.03 Edition (1988), SAS Institute, Cary, NC
34. Secretaria del Medio Ambiente Recursos Naturales y Pesca (SEMARNAP), 2000. Informe Final Michoacán (Report on evaluation of year 1999's reforestations in Michoacán State). SEMARNAP, Mexico DF.
35. Sheinbaum C., and Masera O. Mitigating carbon emissions while advancing national development priorities: the case of Mexico. Climatic Change 47 (2000) 259-282
36. Tchebakova N.M., Rehfeldt G.E., and Parfenova A.I. Redistribution of vegetation zones and populations of Larix sibirica Ledeb. and Pinus sylvestris L. in Central Siberia in a warming climate. Siberian Ecol. J. 10 (2003) 677-686 (in Russian)
37. Tuhkanen S. Climatic parameters and indices in plant geography. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 67 (1980) 1-105
38. Zamora-Serrano C. Algunos aspectos sobre Pinus oocarpa Schiede en el estado de Chiapas. Ciencia Forestal 32 (1981) 25-53