Concept formation as knowledge accumulation: A computational linguistics study

Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 35-53

  Dong, Andy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Concept Formation; Design Language; Latent Semantic analysis; Lexical Chain Analysis

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT FORMATION; DESIGN LANGUAGE; LATENT SEMANTIC ANALYSIS; LEXICAL CHAIN ANALYSIS;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DATA PROCESSING; DATA STRUCTURES; LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS;

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

EID: 33744478409     PISSN: 08900604     EISSN: 14691760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0890060406060033     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Benami, O., & Jin, Y. (2002). Creative stimulation in conceptual design. Proc. ASME 14th Int. Conf. Design Theory and Methodology, Paper No. DTM-34023, Montreal.
2. Brereton, M.F., Cannon, D.M., Mabogunje, A., & Leifer, L.J. (1996). Collaboration in design teams: mediating design progress through social interaction. In Analysing Design Activity (Cross, N., Christiaans, H., & Dorst, K., Eds.), pp. 319-341. Chichester: Wiley.
3. Buchanan, R. (1989). Declaration by design: rhetoric, argument, and demonstration in design practice. In Design Discourse: History, Theory, Criticism (Margolin, V., Ed.), pp. 91-109. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Coyne, R.D., Newton, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1993). A connectionist view of creative design reasoning. In Modeling Creativity and KnowledgeBased Creative Design (Gero, J.S., & Maher, M.L., Eds.), pp. 177209. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Cutkosky, M., Engelmore, R., Fikes, R., Genesereth, M., Gruber, T., Mark, W., Tenenbaum, J., & Weber, J. (1993). PACT: an experiment in integrating concurrent engineering systems. Computer 26(1), 28-37.
6. de Vries, B., Jessurun, J., Segers, N., & Achten, H. (2004). Word graphs in architectural design. In Design Computing and Cognition '04 (Gero, J.S., Ed.), pp. 541-556. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
7. Dong, A. (2005). The latent semantic approach to studying design team communication. Design Studies 26(5), 445-461.
8. Fellbaum, C. (1998). WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Foltz, P.W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T.K. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 25(2-3), 285-307.
10. Garcia, A.C.B., & Howard, H.C. (1992). Acquiring design knowledge through design decision justification. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 6(1), 59-71.
11. Gero, J.S. (1990). Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine 11(4), 26-36.
12. Goldschmidt, G. (1996). The designer as a team of one. In Analysing Design Activity (Cross, N., Christiaans, H., & Dorst, K., Eds.), pp. 65-91. Chichester: Wiley.
13. Jacobsen, K., Sigurjónsson, J., & Jakobsen, Ø. (1991). Formalized specification of functional requirements. Design Studies 12(4), 221-224.
14. Landauer, T.K. (1999). Latent semantic analysis: a theory of the psychology of language and mind. Discourse Processes 27(3), 303-310.
15. Lloyd, P., Lawson, B., & Scott, P. (1995). Can concurrent verbalization reveal design cognition? Design Studies 16(2), 237-259.
16. Mabogunje, A., & Leifer, L. (1997). Noun phrases as surrogates for measuring early phases of the mechanical design process. Proc. ASME 9th Int. Conf. Design Theory and Methodology, New York.
17. Oxman, R. (2002). The thinking eye: visual re-cognition in design emergence. Design Studies 23(2), 135-164.
18. Poole, M.S. (1999). Group communication theory. In The Handbook of Group Communication Theory and Research (Frey, L.R., Gouran, D., & Poole, M.S., Eds.), pp. 88-165. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Regli, W.C., Hu, X., Atwood, M., & Sun, W. (2000). A survey of design rationale systems: Approaches, representation, capture and retrieval. Engineering with Computers 16(3-4), 209-235.
20. Schön, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
21. Shannon, C.E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 27, 379-423 and 623-656.
22. Silber, H.G., & McCoy, K.F. (2002). Efficiently computed lexical chains as an intermediate representation for automatic text summarization. Computational Linguistics 28(4), 487-496.
23. Sonnenwald, D.H. (1996). Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process. Design Studies 17(3), 277-301.
24. Stempfle, J. (2004). Personal communication to Andy Dong, Sydney [e-mail].
25. Stempfle, J., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2002). Thinking in design teams-an analysis of team communication. Design Studies 23(5), 437-496.
26. Valkenburg, R.C. (1998). Shared understanding as a condition for team design. Automation in Construction 7(2-3), 111-121.
27. van der Lugt, R. (2005). How sketching can affect the idea generation process in design group meetings. Design Studies 26(2), 101-122.
28. Wood, W.H., III, & Agogino, A.M. (1996). Case-based conceptual design information server for concurrent engineering. Computer-Aided Design 28(5), 361-369.
29. Zeitz, C.M. ( 1997). Some concrete advantages of abstraction: how experts' representations facilitate reasoning. In Expertise in Context (Feltovich, P.J., Ford, K.M., & Hoffman, R.R., Eds.), pp. 43-65. Menlo Park, CA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence.