Agriculture and endangered species: An analysis of trade-offs in the Klamath Basin, Oregon

Water Resources Research

Volumn 34, Issue 10, 1998, Pages 2741-2749

  Adams, Richard M ^a   Cho, Seong Hoon ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS; AGROECOLOGY; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FISH; IRRIGATION; LAKE WATER; NATURE CONSERVATION; TRADE-OFF;

KLAMATH BASIN; OREGON; UNITED STATES;

AGRICULTURE; COMMERCE; CONSERVATION; COSTS; DROUGHT; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; FISH; IRRIGATION; PROFITABILITY; WATER; WATER LEVELS; WATER SUPPLY;

ECONOMIC BURDEN; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT; FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICES; FISH PROTECTION; IRRIGATION WATER SUPPLY; IRRIGATION WATERS; MARGINAL COST CURVES;

LAKES;

EID: 3543061589     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/98WR01925     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Brooke, A., D. Kendrick, and A. Meeraus, GAMS, A User's Guide, Scientific, Cambridge, Mass., 1994.
2. Connor, J. D., Market water transfers as a water quality policy: A case study of the Malheur River Basin, Oregon, doctoral dissertation, Oreg. State Univ., Corvallis, 1995.
3. El-Nazer, T., and B. A. McCarl, The choice of crop rotation: A modeling approach and case study, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 68(1), 127-136, 1986.
4. Hewlett, J., T. Cross, and R. Hart, Enterprise budget: Native hay, Lakeview area, EM 8336, Oreg. State Univ. Ext. Serv., Corvallis, June 1987.
5. Klamath Water Users Associations, Drought plan, Upper Klamath Lake watershed, draft report, Drought Conserv. Adv. Comm., Klamath Falls, Oreg., Feb. 1992.
6. Locke, K., and B. Turner, Enterprise budget: Potatoes, south central region, EM 8589, Oreg. State Univ. Ext. Serv., Corvallis, April 1995.
7. Oregon State University Extension Service, Onion data sheet, Corvallis, May 1992.
8. Seginer, I., A note on the economic significance of uniform water application, Irrig. Sci., 1, 19-25, 1978.
9. Taylor, L., A. Michael, S. Markham, and G. J. Pireli, Enterprise budget: Pasture, Willamette Valley region, EM 8492, Oreg. State Univ. Ext. Serv., Corvallis, Jan. 1992.
10. Turner, B., A farm-level economic analysis of water-conserving irrigation systems and commercial agricultural water transfers to instream flows in central Oregon, Master's thesis, Oreg. State Univ., Corvallis, Sept. 1995.
11. Turner, B., and M. Bohle, Enterprise budgets: Various crops and regions, EM 8591, EM 8594, EM 8604, Oreg. State Univ. Ext. Serv., Corvallis, 1995.
12. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, General information, Klamath Project, Klamath Water Rights, Klamath Falls, Oreg., Aug. 1993.
13. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Draft technical memorandum on agriculture and refuge water use, Klamath Project Operation Plan, Klamath Falls, Oreg., Nov. 1995a.
14. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Klamath Project 1995 Operations Plan, Klamath Basin Area Off., Klamath Falls, Oreg., April 1995b.
15. U.S. Department of Agriculture, (USDA) Soil Conservation Service, Soil survey of Klamath County, Oregon, Klamath Falls, Oreg., April 1985.
16. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Soil survey of Butte Valley-Tulelake area, California, Parts of Siskiyou and Modoc Counties, Klamath Falls, Oreg., February 1994.
17. Warrick, A. W., and W. R. Gardner, Crop yield as affected by spatial variations of soil and irrigation, Water Resour. Res., 19, 181-186, 1983.
18. Warrick, A. W., and S. R. Yates, Crop yield as influenced by irrigation uniformity, in Advances in Irrigation, vol. 4, edited by D. Hillel, pp. 169-180, Academic, San Diego, Calif., 1987.